Department of Psychology, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
Psychol Serv. 2018 Feb;15(1):65-77. doi: 10.1037/ser0000162. Epub 2017 May 18.
This study examined whether psychological treatment for youth with comorbid externalizing and internalizing disorders targets externalizing rather than internalizing pathology. Therapist-reported treatment targets for youth (N = 679) with (a) only internalizing diagnoses (n = 195); (b) only externalizing diagnoses (n = 314); (c) a primary internalizing diagnosis and at least 1 additional externalizing diagnosis (n = 75); and (d) a primary externalizing diagnosis and at least 1 additional internalizing diagnosis (n = 95) receiving treatment-as-usual in a public mental health system of care were examined. Treatment targets that appeared significantly more often in the externalizing-only and internalizing-only diagnostic groups were empirically determined, and a derived proportional measure of these targets was analyzed across all 4 diagnostic groups, controlling for effects of additional client and treatment characteristics. As required by the target selection method, the proportion of externalizing targets selected in treatment was greatest for youth with externalizing-only diagnoses and least for youth with internalizing-only diagnoses. Importantly, the co-occurrence of a secondary externalizing disorder with a primary internalizing disorder resulted in a large increase in the proportion of externalizing targets endorsed, whereas the co-occurrence of an internalizing disorder with a primary externalizing disorder resulted in a comparatively small decrease in the proportion of externalizing targets endorsed. Results persisted despite several covariates also predicting increased focus on externalizing targets, including male gender and younger age. These findings suggest that community therapists tend to prioritize externalizing over internalizing problems during treatment for such comorbid youth. Implications for practice, research and dissemination/implementation efforts are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究考察了针对共患外化和内化障碍的青少年的心理治疗是否以外化病理而不是内化病理为目标。(a)仅有内化诊断的青少年(n=195);(b)仅有外化诊断的青少年(n=314);(c)主要内化诊断和至少 1 种额外外化诊断的青少年(n=75);(d)主要外化诊断和至少 1 种额外内化诊断的青少年(n=95)在公共心理健康系统中接受常规治疗,对他们的治疗目标进行了评估。在外部化障碍和内部化障碍诊断组中,出现频率明显更高的治疗目标是通过实证确定的,并且在所有 4 个诊断组中,控制了额外的客户和治疗特征的影响,对这些目标进行了衍生的比例测量。按照目标选择方法的要求,在外部化障碍组中,选择外部化障碍目标的比例最高,而在仅内部化障碍组中选择的比例最低。重要的是,次要外化障碍与主要内化障碍的同时存在导致了更多外化障碍目标的支持,而内化障碍与主要外化障碍的同时存在则导致了外化障碍目标的支持比例相对较小的下降。尽管其他几个协变量也预测了对外化障碍目标的关注增加,包括男性性别和年轻年龄,但结果仍然存在。这些发现表明,社区治疗师在治疗共患青少年时往往更倾向于将重点放在外化问题上,而不是内化问题上。讨论了对实践、研究和推广/实施工作的影响。