• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者报告的影响老年女性非转移性乳腺癌治疗决策过程的因素:定性证据的系统评价。

Patient-reported factors influencing the treatment decision-making process of older women with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;171(3):545-564. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4865-0. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

DOI:10.1007/s10549-018-4865-0
PMID:29974359
Abstract

PURPOSE

Older women (≥ 70 years old) with breast cancer undergo different treatments than young women. Studies have examined factors that influence this disparity, but synthesized patient-reported data are lacking in the literature. This study aims to identify, appraise, and synthesize the existing qualitative evidence on patient-reported factors influencing older women's decision to accept or decline breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA) principles. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for qualitative studies describing patient-reported factors influencing the decision-making process of older women (≥ 70 years old) with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer. Quality was assessed using the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) criteria. Common ideas were coded, thematically organized, and synthesized within a theoretical framework.

RESULTS

Of 5998 studies identified, 10 met eligibility criteria. The median SRQR total score was 13.04 (IQR 12.84-13.81). The studies represented a range of cancer treatments; most of the studies focused on surgery and primary endocrine therapy. Our data show that the most common patient-reported factors in the decision-making process included treatment characteristics, personal goals/beliefs, patient characteristics, physician's recommendation, and personal/family experience. These factors led the patient to either accept or decline treatment, and were not consistent across all studies included. Studies used different interview guides, which may have affected these results.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review highlights the complexity of factors that influence an older woman's treatment decision-making process. Acknowledging and addressing these factors may improve discussions about treatment choices between older women and their health care providers, and encourage maximization of a patient-centered approach.

摘要

目的

患有乳腺癌的老年女性(≥70 岁)接受的治疗与年轻女性不同。已有研究探讨了影响这种差异的因素,但文献中缺乏患者报告的综合数据。本研究旨在确定、评估和综合现有关于影响老年女性接受或拒绝乳腺癌治疗决策的患者报告因素的定性证据。

方法

根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告规范(PRISMA)原则进行系统综述。检索 Medline、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO,以获取描述影响≥70 岁患有非转移性浸润性乳腺癌的老年女性决策过程的患者报告因素的定性研究。使用标准报告定性研究(SRQR)标准评估质量。对常见想法进行编码、主题组织,并在理论框架内进行综合。

结果

在 5998 项研究中,有 10 项符合入选标准。SRQR 总分中位数为 13.04(IQR 12.84-13.81)。这些研究代表了一系列癌症治疗方法;大多数研究集中在手术和原发性内分泌治疗上。我们的数据表明,决策过程中最常见的患者报告因素包括治疗特征、个人目标/信念、患者特征、医生建议和个人/家庭经验。这些因素导致患者接受或拒绝治疗,并且在所有纳入的研究中并不一致。研究使用了不同的访谈指南,这可能影响了这些结果。

结论

本系统综述强调了影响老年女性治疗决策过程的因素的复杂性。承认和解决这些因素可能会改善老年女性及其医疗保健提供者之间关于治疗选择的讨论,并鼓励最大限度地采用以患者为中心的方法。

相似文献

1
Patient-reported factors influencing the treatment decision-making process of older women with non-metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.患者报告的影响老年女性非转移性乳腺癌治疗决策过程的因素:定性证据的系统评价。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Oct;171(3):545-564. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4865-0. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
3
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
4
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
5
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术用于预防乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub2.
6
Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer.用于预防或治疗早期乳腺癌中芳香化酶抑制剂引起的肌肉骨骼症状的系统治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 10;1(1):CD013167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013167.pub2.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Context factors in clinical decision-making: a scoping review.临床决策中的背景因素:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02965-1.
2
Health Information Needs of Breast Cancer Survivors: An Umbrella Review.乳腺癌幸存者的健康信息需求:一项综合综述。
Breast J. 2024 Jul 15;2024:5889622. doi: 10.1155/2024/5889622. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and Validation of an Interpretable Machine Learning Prediction Model for Total Pathological Complete Response after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Multicenter Retrospective Analysis.
局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗后总病理完全缓解的可解释机器学习预测模型的开发与验证:多中心回顾性分析
J Cancer. 2024 Aug 1;15(15):5058-5071. doi: 10.7150/jca.97190. eCollection 2024.
4
Decision regret regarding treatments among women with early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review protocol.早期乳腺癌女性治疗决策后悔的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 17;12(3):e058425. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058425.
5
Association Between Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer and Survival in a Resource-Limited Setting.资源有限环境下,乳腺癌辅助治疗临床实践指南依从性与生存的相关性。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2022 Mar;8:e2100314. doi: 10.1200/GO.21.00314.
6
Low RUFY3 expression level is associated with lymph node metastasis in older women with invasive breast cancer.低 RUFY3 表达水平与老年浸润性乳腺癌女性的淋巴结转移相关。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Feb;192(1):19-32. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06482-3. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
7
The Impact of Dementia on Cancer Treatment Decision-Making, Cancer Treatment, and Mortality: A Mixed Studies Review.痴呆症对癌症治疗决策、癌症治疗和死亡率的影响:混合研究综述。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Jan 27;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab002. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Diversity of interpretations of the concept "patient-centered care for breast cancer patients"; a scoping review of current literature.对“以乳腺癌患者为中心的护理”概念的多样性解释;对当前文献的范围综述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2022 Oct;28(5):773-793. doi: 10.1111/jep.13584. Epub 2021 May 17.
9
Older women's experience with breast cancer treatment: A systematic review of qualitative literature.老年女性乳腺癌治疗体验:定性文献的系统评价。
Breast. 2020 Dec;54:293-302. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.11.009. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
10
Independent risk factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients with one or two positive sentinel lymph nodes.乳腺癌患者 1-2 枚前哨淋巴结阳性时腋窝淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。
BMC Womens Health. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01004-7.