Suppr超能文献

印度喜马偕尔邦农业工人的农药接触性皮炎。

Pesticide contact dermatitis in agricultural workers of Himachal Pradesh (India).

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprosy, Dr R. P. Government Medical College, Kangra (Tanda), H.P. India.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2018 Oct;79(4):213-217. doi: 10.1111/cod.13049. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Common pesticides used in the region by agricultural workers may cause contact allergy.

METHODS

Thirty agricultural workers with a history of pesticide exposure and dermatitis involving the face, neck, trunk or extremities, and 20 controls comprising 2 groups of 10 subjects each, group 1 with dermatitis and no exposure to pesticides, and group 2 with neither exposure to pesticides nor dermatitis, were patch tested with 10 pesticides commonly used in the region by use of the Finn Chamber method.

RESULTS

The 30 patients, 20 of whom were male, aged 30-77 years, had dermatitis for 1 month to 18 years, with relapses and remissions. Seasonal exacerbation was present in 18 patients. Six patients attributed aggravation of their dermatitis to pesticide exposure, and 2 of these reacted positively to propiconazole. Positive patch test reactions to pesticides occurred in 10 patients, but not in controls. Thiuram was the commonest sensitizer (4 patients). Three patients were sensitized to propiconazole, and 2 patients reacted positively to metaldehyde. Formaldehyde, mercaptobenzothiazole, cypermethrin and isoproturon gave positive reactions in 1 patient each.

CONCLUSION

The sensitizing potential of pesticides remains a concern. Apparently, pesticide contact dermatitis is more common than expected, but remains under-reported, as the implicated pesticides vary across regions and according to the crop patterns.

摘要

背景

该地区农业工人常用的普通农药可能会引起接触过敏。

方法

共有 30 名有农药接触史且皮炎累及面部、颈部、躯干或四肢的农业工人和 20 名对照组人员参与了本次研究,对照组由两组各 10 名人员组成,其中第 1 组人员患有皮炎且未接触过农药,第 2 组人员既未接触过农药也没有皮炎。采用 Finn 室法对这 30 名患者(其中 20 名为男性)和 20 名对照组人员进行了 10 种常见地区农药的斑贴试验,这些患者的年龄为 30-77 岁,皮炎病史 1 个月至 18 年不等,且反复发作、时好时坏。18 名患者存在季节性加重。6 名患者将皮炎加重归因于农药接触,其中 2 名对丙环唑呈阳性反应。10 名患者的斑贴试验对农药呈阳性反应,但对照组人员无此反应。四硫代双戊噻唑(thiuram)是最常见的致敏剂(4 名患者)。3 名患者对丙环唑过敏,2 名患者对多聚甲醛呈阳性反应。1 名患者对甲醛、巯基苯并噻唑、氯菊酯和异丙隆呈阳性反应。

结论

农药的致敏潜力仍然令人担忧。显然,农药接触性皮炎比预期更为常见,但由于涉及的农药因地区和作物模式而异,因此报告的病例较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验