Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Nov;62(10):1396-1402. doi: 10.1111/aas.13209. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
The use of cricoid pressure is controversial, and its ability to occlude the esophagus has been questioned. In this study, high-resolution solid-state manometry was used to analyze pressure changes in the upper esophagus from cricoid pressure during modified rapid sequence induction. This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study.
Seventeen healthy volunteers participated in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over study with primary aim to compare differences in the barrier pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter during rapid sequence induction with or without alfentanil. Standardized cricoid pressure of 30 N was applied 2 minutes after propolipid injection and held for 15 seconds and pressures in the esophagus were measured.
Cricoid pressure resulted in a pressure increase of 127 ± 98 mmHg (95% CI: 73-182) (placebo) and 123 ± 74 mmHg (95% CI: 84-162) (alfentanil) at the level of the upper esophageal sphincter (UES), compared to baseline. The pressure difference around the UES compared to the proximal esophagus during cricoid pressure application was 165 ± 100 mmHg (placebo) and 159 ± 87 mmHg (alfentanil) (mean ± 1 SD).
This study using high-resolution solid-state manometry under clinically relevant conditions shows that 30 N cricoid pressure generates high pressure in the area of the UES, far exceeding the levels previously considered necessary to prevent regurgitation. Additional studies are needed to clarify the effectiveness of cricoid pressure in preventing passive regurgitation before it is rejected as a part of rapid sequence induction.
环甲膜压迫的使用存在争议,其对食管的阻塞能力受到质疑。在这项研究中,使用高分辨率固态测压法分析了改良快速序贯诱导期间环甲膜压迫对上食管压力的变化。这是对先前研究数据的二次分析。
17 名健康志愿者参与了一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、交叉研究,主要目的是比较在快速序贯诱导期间使用或不使用阿芬太尼时,下食管括约肌的屏障压力差异。在丙泊酚注射后 2 分钟施加 30N 的标准化环甲膜压力,并持续 15 秒,同时测量食管内的压力。
与基线相比,环甲膜压迫在上食管括约肌水平产生了 127±98mmHg(95%CI:73-182)(安慰剂)和 123±74mmHg(95%CI:84-162)(阿芬太尼)的压力增加。与环甲膜压迫期间近端食管相比,UES 周围的压力差为 165±100mmHg(安慰剂)和 159±87mmHg(阿芬太尼)(均值±1SD)。
本研究在临床相关条件下使用高分辨率固态测压法显示,30N 的环甲膜压力在上食管括约肌区域产生的高压远远超过了先前认为预防反流所需的水平。需要进一步研究来阐明环甲膜压迫在预防被动反流方面的有效性,然后才能将其作为快速序贯诱导的一部分而被拒绝。