Endocr Pract. 2018 Oct 2;24(10):867-874. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0183. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
To explore a comprehensive approach for on-site gross visual assessments of liquid-based cytology (LBC) specimens of thyroid nodules and determine morphologic criteria that help predict nondiagnostic rates.
Two-hundred nodules from 165 patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) at our hospital were included in this prospectively designed, retrospective analysis. Specimens were visually assessed on-site for three morphologic categories (specimen color, specimen volume, and particle count) using a 5-point grading.
Twenty-two nodules (11%) showed nondiagnostic results. Regarding specimen color, nondiagnostic rates tended to be higher in grades 1 (75%) and 5 (100%) than in grades 2 (18%), 3 (8%), or 4 (17%), with a significant difference between grade 1 and grade 3 ( P = .003). For specimen volume, nondiagnostic results were significantly more common in grade 1 (33%) and 5 (33%) than in grades 3 (5%) or 4 (1%) ( P<.005). There was a significant negative correlation between the grading of the particle count and the nondiagnostic rate (Spearman ρ = -1.000; P<.001). The sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of nondiagnostic results were 77% and 76%, respectively, at the optimal cutoff value of 2 (grade 2 or lower).
Particle count was an important morphologic criterion that helped predict nondiagnostic rates in LBC specimens of thyroid nodules, and the specimen color and volume were also useful adjuncts. In routine practice, on-site gross visual assessment followed by resampling (if necessary) may potentially help reduce the rates of nondiagnostic results, repeat FNAs, and the number of unnecessary needle passes.
FNA = fine-needle aspiration; LBC = liquid-based cytology; ROC = receiver operating characteristic; US = ultrasonography.
探索一种综合方法对甲状腺结节液基细胞学(LBC)标本进行现场大体目测评估,并确定有助于预测非诊断率的形态学标准。
本前瞻性设计的回顾性分析纳入了 165 名在我院接受细针穿刺抽吸(FNA)的患者的 200 个结节。使用 5 分制对三个形态类别(标本颜色、标本体积和颗粒计数)进行现场目测评估。
22 个结节(11%)显示非诊断结果。就标本颜色而言,1 级(75%)和 5 级(100%)的非诊断率高于 2 级(18%)、3 级(8%)或 4 级(17%),且 1 级与 3 级之间差异具有统计学意义(P=0.003)。对于标本体积,1 级(33%)和 5 级(33%)的非诊断结果明显多于 3 级(5%)或 4 级(1%)(P<.005)。颗粒计数的分级与非诊断率呈显著负相关(Spearman ρ=-1.000;P<.001)。在最佳截断值为 2 级(或更低)时,预测非诊断结果的灵敏度和特异度分别为 77%和 76%。
颗粒计数是预测甲状腺结节 LBC 标本非诊断率的重要形态学标准,标本颜色和体积也是有用的辅助手段。在常规实践中,现场大体目测评估后(如有必要)进行重新取样,可能有助于降低非诊断率、重复 FNA 以及不必要的针数。
FNA=细针穿刺抽吸;LBC=液基细胞学;ROC=接受者操作特征;US=超声。