a Visiting Scholar, Program on Emerging Technologies , Massachusetts Institute of Technology , Cambridge , MA , USA.
b Center for International Security and Cooperation , Stanford University , Stanford , CA , USA.
Pathog Glob Health. 2018 Jun;112(4):162-181. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1478776. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Governance is a broader and more flexible concept than statute-driven regulations as it incorporates components outside the latter's remit. Considerations of governance are critical in the development of emerging biotechnologies such as gene drive organisms. These have been proposed or are being developed to address public and environmental health issues not addressed easily by conventional means. Here, we consider how the concept of governance differs from statute-driven regulation with reference to the role each may play in the development of gene drive organisms. First, we discuss existing statute-based regulatory systems. Second, we consider whether novel risks or different concerns derive from gene drive organisms, concentrating on characteristics that contribute to public health or environmental risk and uncertainties that may affect risk perceptions. Third, we consider public engagement, outlining how existing statute-driven regulatory systems and other governance mechanisms may provide opportunities for constructive interactions. Finally, we provide some observations that may help address science- and values-based concerns in a governance space larger than that of statute-driven regulatory systems.
治理是一个比法规驱动的监管更为广泛和灵活的概念,因为它包含了后者职权范围之外的组成部分。在新兴生物技术(如基因驱动生物)的发展中,治理的考虑因素至关重要。这些生物技术已经被提出或正在开发中,以解决传统手段难以解决的公共和环境健康问题。在这里,我们考虑治理的概念与法规驱动的监管之间的区别,以及它们在基因驱动生物发展中可能扮演的角色。首先,我们讨论了现有的基于法规的监管系统。其次,我们考虑了基因驱动生物是否会带来新的风险或不同的关注点,重点关注那些对公共健康或环境风险有贡献的特征,以及可能影响风险认知的不确定性。第三,我们考虑公众参与,概述了现有的基于法规的监管系统和其他治理机制如何为建设性互动提供机会。最后,我们提出了一些观察结果,这些结果可能有助于在一个比法规驱动的监管系统更大的治理空间中解决基于科学和价值观的问题。