Qian Shi, Fang-Shu Ou, Jesse G. Dixon, and Thomas M. Habermann, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Norbert Schmitz, University of Muenster, Muenster; Michael Pfreundschuh, Universität des Saarlandes, Homburg; Marita Ziepert, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; David Cunningham, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom; John F. Seymour, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Ulrich Jaeger, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Corinne Haioun, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil; Hervé Tilly, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1245, Université de Rouen, Rouen; Hervé Ghesquieres and Bertrand Coiffier, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite; Raoul Herbrecht, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Strasbourg, France; Francesco Merli, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Jocelyne Flament, Celgene, Boudry, Switzerland; Tommy Fu, Celgene, Summit, NJ; and Christopher R. Flowers, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;36(25):2593-2602. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.77.9124. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Purpose Overall survival (OS) is the definitive and best-established primary efficacy end point to evaluate diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) therapies, but it requires prolonged follow-up. An earlier end point assessed post-treatment would expedite clinical trial conduct and accelerate patient access to effective new therapies. Our objective was to formally evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and PFS at 24 months (PFS24) as surrogate end points for OS in first-line DLBCL. Patients and Methods Individual patient data were analyzed from 7,507 patients from 13 multicenter randomized controlled trials of active treatment in previously untreated DLBCL, published after 2002, with sufficient PFS data to predict treatment effects on OS. Trial-level surrogacy examining the correlation of treatment effect estimates of PFS/PFS24 and OS was evaluated using both linear regression ( R) and Copula bivariable ( R) models. Prespecified criteria for surrogacy required either R or R ≥ 0.80 and neither < 0.7, with lower-bound 95% CI > 0.60. Results Trial-level surrogacy for PFS was strong ( R = 0.83; R = 0.85) and met the predefined criteria for surrogacy. At the patient level, PFS strongly correlated with OS. The surrogate threshold effect had a hazard ratio of 0.89. Surrogacy was consistent across comparisons with or without rituximab and with rituximab maintenance trials. Trial-level surrogacy for PFS24 was relatively strong ( R = 0.77; R = 0.78) but did not meet prespecified criteria. At the patient level, PFS24 significantly correlated with OS. The surrogate threshold effect had an odds ratio of 1.51. Conclusion This large pooled analysis of individual patient data supports PFS as a surrogate end point for OS in future randomized controlled trials evaluating chemoimmunotherapy in DLBCL. Use of this end point may expedite therapeutic development with the intent of bringing novel therapies to this patient population years before OS results are mature.
总生存期(OS)是评估弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)治疗的明确和最佳的主要疗效终点,但需要进行长期随访。评估治疗后更早的终点将加速临床试验的进行,并加速患者获得有效新疗法的机会。我们的目的是正式评估无进展生存期(PFS)和 24 个月时的 PFS(PFS24)作为一线 DLBCL 中 OS 的替代终点。
对 2002 年后发表的 13 项多中心、随机对照临床试验中,7507 例未经治疗的 DLBCL 患者的个体患者数据进行了分析,这些试验均使用了活性药物治疗,并且具有足够的 PFS 数据来预测对 OS 的治疗效果。使用线性回归(R)和 Copula 双变量(R)模型评估了检查 PFS/PFS24 和 OS 的治疗效果估计值相关性的试验水平替代物。替代物的预设标准要求 R 或 R≥0.80,且均不小于 0.7,下限 95%CI>0.60。
PFS 的试验水平替代物较强(R=0.83;R=0.85),符合替代物的预设标准。在患者水平上,PFS 与 OS 密切相关。替代物的阈值效应的风险比为 0.89。在有无利妥昔单抗的比较以及利妥昔单抗维持试验中,替代物均具有一致性。PFS24 的试验水平替代物相对较强(R=0.77;R=0.78),但不符合预设标准。在患者水平上,PFS24 与 OS 显著相关。替代物的阈值效应的优势比为 1.51。
这项对个体患者数据的大型汇总分析支持 PFS 作为未来评估 DLBCL 中化疗免疫治疗的随机对照试验中 OS 的替代终点。使用该终点可能会加速治疗的发展,以便在 OS 结果成熟之前数年为该患者群体带来新的疗法。