Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Guangzhou, China.
J Immunother Cancer. 2024 Oct 24;12(10):e008895. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-008895.
In patients with untreated CD20-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), a phase 3 trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zuberitamab plus CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone; Hi-CHOP) versus rituximab plus CHOP (R-CHOP) treatment regimens.
In a 2:1 ratio, eligible patients were assigned randomly to receive treatment of six cycles of either 375 mg/m zuberitamab or rituximab together with conventional CHOP chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) at C6D50 served as the primary endpoint, and a non-inferiority margin of 10% was established. The secondary endpoints included the complete response (CR) rate at C6D50, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and event-free survival (EFS) judged by blinded-independent review committee (BIRC), overall survival (OS) and safety outcomes.
Of the 487 randomized patients, 423 patients including 287 in the Hi-CHOP and 136 in the R-CHOP groups completed the C6D50 assessment. For the full analysis set (FAS) and per-protocol set (PPS), BIRC-assessed ORR at C6D50 for the Hi-CHOP and R-CHOP groups were 83.5% versus 81.4% and 95.3% versus 93.7%, respectively. The non-inferiority was confirmed as the lower limit of the two-sided 95% CI for the intergroup differences of -5.2% and -3.3%; both were >-10% in the FAS and PPS. The BIRC-assessed CR rate of Hi-CHOP was significantly higher in PPS (85.7% vs 77.3%, p=0.038), but comparable in FAS (75.2% vs 67.9%, p=0.092). After a median follow-up of 29.6 months, patients in the Hi-CHOP group had a slight advantage with regard to the DOR (HR 0.74, p=0.173), PFS (HR 0.67, p=0.057), EFS (HR 0.90, p=0.517) and OS (HR 0.60, p=0.059). Patients with the germinal-center B cell-like subtype who received Hi-CHOP exhibited statistically significant improvements in ORR (p=0.034) and CR rate (p=0.038) at C6D50, EFS (p=0.046) and OS (p=0.014). Treatment-emergent adverse event occurrence rates were comparable across groups (all p>0.05). Infusion-related responses occurred more often in the Hi-CHOP group (32.1% vs 19.9%, p=0.006), all of grade 1-3 severity.
Zuberitamab (375 mg/m) plus CHOP was non-inferior to R-CHOP regarding ORR but exhibited a higher CR rate and was well tolerated in CD20-positive, previously untreated Chinese patients with DLBCL.
Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000040602, retrospectively registered.
在未经治疗的 CD20 阳性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中,进行了一项 3 期试验,以评估 zuberitamab 联合 CHOP(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松;Hi-CHOP)与利妥昔单抗联合 CHOP(R-CHOP)治疗方案的疗效和安全性。
按照 2:1 的比例,合格的患者被随机分配接受 6 个周期的 375mg/m zuberitamab 或利妥昔单抗联合常规 CHOP 化疗。C6D50 的客观缓解率(ORR)作为主要终点,并设定了 10%的非劣效性边界。次要终点包括 C6D50 的完全缓解(CR)率、缓解持续时间(DOR)、无进展生存期(PFS)和无事件生存期(EFS)(由盲法独立审查委员会[BIRC]判断)、总生存期(OS)和安全性结局。
在 487 名随机患者中,包括 287 名接受 Hi-CHOP 和 136 名接受 R-CHOP 治疗的患者在内的 423 名患者完成了 C6D50 评估。对于全分析集(FAS)和方案符合集(PPS),BIRC 评估的 C6D50 时 Hi-CHOP 和 R-CHOP 组的 ORR 分别为 83.5%和 81.4%和 95.3%和 93.7%。非劣效性得到确认,两组间差异的双侧 95%CI 的下限为-5.2%和-3.3%;在 FAS 和 PPS 中均大于-10%。在 PPS 中,Hi-CHOP 的 BIRC 评估的 CR 率明显更高(85.7%比 77.3%,p=0.038),但在 FAS 中相似(75.2%比 67.9%,p=0.092)。在中位随访 29.6 个月后,Hi-CHOP 组在 DOR(HR 0.74,p=0.173)、PFS(HR 0.67,p=0.057)、EFS(HR 0.90,p=0.517)和 OS(HR 0.60,p=0.059)方面略有优势。接受 Hi-CHOP 的生发中心 B 细胞样亚型患者在 C6D50 的 ORR(p=0.034)和 CR 率(p=0.038)、EFS(p=0.046)和 OS(p=0.014)方面有统计学意义的改善。各组的治疗相关不良事件发生率相似(均 p>0.05)。Hi-CHOP 组更常发生输注相关反应(32.1%比 19.9%,p=0.006),均为 1-3 级严重程度。
zuberitamab(375mg/m)联合 CHOP 在 ORR 方面不劣于 R-CHOP,但在未经治疗的中国 CD20 阳性弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中,显示出更高的 CR 率且耐受性良好。
中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2000040602,回顾性注册。