School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong.
Department of Disaster Nursing, Sichuan University-The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Institute for Disaster Management and Reconstruction, Chengdu, China.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 5;13(7):e0199747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199747. eCollection 2018.
Hospitals are vulnerable to fires and the evacuation process is challenging. However, face-to-face fire prevention and evacuation training may take healthcare workers' time away from patient care; therefore, effective on-line training may be warranted. We carried out and examined the effectiveness of an on-line education and training of fire prevention and evacuation training for healthcare workers in China by a randomized controlled trial using convenience sampling from five public hospitals in China.
A total of 128 participants were recruited between December 2014 and March 2015. The authors built a webpage that included the informed consent statement, pre-test questionnaire, video training, and post-test questionnaire. After completing the pre-test questionnaire, participants were randomly assigned to watch the intervention video (basic response to a hospital fire) or the control video (introduction to volcanic disasters). A 45-item questionnaire on knowledge of fire prevention and evacuation was administered before and after the video watching. This questionnaire were further divided into two subscales (25-item generic knowledge of fire response and 20-item hospital-specific knowledge of fire prevention and evacuation). One point was awarded for each correct answer.
Half of the participants (n = 64, 50%) were randomized into the intervention group and the remaining 64 (50%) were randomized into the control group. For generic knowledge of fire prevention and evacuation, those in the intervention group improved significantly (from 16.16 to 20.44, P < 0.001) while the scores of those in the control group decreased significantly (from 15.27 to 13.70, P = 0.03). For hospital-specific knowledge of fire prevention and evacuation, those in the intervention group (from 10.75 to 11.33, P = 0.15) and the control group (from 10.38 to 10.16, P = 0.54) had insignificant change. For total score, those in the intervention group improved significantly (from 26.91 to 31.77, P < 0.001) while those in the control group decreased insignificantly (from 25.64 to 23.86, P = 0.07). After the intervention, the difference between the scores of the intervention group and the control group on all three knowledge areas of fire prevention and evacuation (generic, hospital-specific, and total) were significant (all Ps < 0.05).
An on-line fire training program delivered via educational video can effectively improve healthcare workers' knowledge of fire prevention and evacuation.
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02438150.
医院容易发生火灾,且疏散过程具有挑战性。然而,面对面的防火和疏散培训可能会占用医护人员的时间,使其无法照顾患者;因此,可能需要有效的在线培训。我们采用便利抽样的方法,从中国的五家公立医院中选取研究对象,进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估在中国开展医护人员在线防火和疏散培训的效果。
2014 年 12 月至 2015 年 3 月期间共招募了 128 名参与者。作者构建了一个网页,其中包括知情同意书、预测试问卷、视频培训和后测试问卷。完成预测试问卷后,参与者被随机分配观看干预视频(医院火灾的基本应对)或对照视频(火山灾害介绍)。观看视频前后,参与者填写了一份关于防火和疏散知识的 45 项选择题问卷。该问卷进一步分为两个分量表(25 项通用火灾应对知识和 20 项医院特定防火和疏散知识)。每题答对得 1 分。
参与者中有一半(n=64,50%)被随机分配到干预组,其余 64 名(50%)被随机分配到对照组。对于通用防火和疏散知识,干预组的得分显著提高(从 16.16 分提高到 20.44 分,P<0.001),而对照组的得分显著降低(从 15.27 分降低到 13.70 分,P=0.03)。对于医院特定防火和疏散知识,干预组(从 10.75 分提高到 11.33 分,P=0.15)和对照组(从 10.38 分提高到 10.16 分,P=0.54)的得分没有显著变化。对于总得分,干预组的得分显著提高(从 26.91 分提高到 31.77 分,P<0.001),而对照组的得分没有显著变化(从 25.64 分降低到 23.86 分,P=0.07)。干预后,干预组和对照组在防火和疏散知识的所有三个领域(通用、医院特定和总分)的得分差异均有统计学意义(均 P<0.05)。
通过教育视频提供的在线防火培训方案可以有效提高医护人员的防火和疏散知识。
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02438150。