Rendevski Vladimir, Aleksovski Boris, Stojanov Dragan, Rendevska Ana Mihajlovska, Aleksovski Vasko, Gjorgoski Icko
University Clinic of Neurosurgery, Medical Faculty, "Ss. Cyril and Methodius'' University, Mother Teresa 17, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia.
Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, "Ss. Cyril and Methodius'' University, Arhimedova 3, P.O. Box 162, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;172:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Prognostic models for Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), mainly based on clinical evaluation, have remained inherently confounded by subjective scoring assessments and limited accuracy. In this study, we aimed at assessing the risk for poor outcome after ICH based on peripheral biochemical markers (TNF-α, glutamate and glucose) and radiological variables (both at admission and five days after patient's care), for modeling purposes of prognostication.
The defined initial variables of fifty non-comatose conservatively treated ICH patients without severe complications during the hospitalization process (as intraventricular bleeding, or hematoma expansion) were aligned with the evaluated parameters during re-evaluation (3 months later). A comprehensive statistical approach has been applied by using different modeling strategies for prediction of their functional status and outcome.
Higher blood plasma glutamate, TNF-α and initial ICH volume at admission, as well as higher volumes of ICH and perihematomal edema after five days of care were significantly more likely associated with the poor outcome. Nevertheless, in all of the constructed models, TNF-α was estimated as the only significant predictive risk factor, thus outperforming the capacity of the initial ICH volume and the radiological variables after 5 days, both in terms of prognostication of the functional status and the 3-month neurological outcome. The constructed canonical variable that has fairly marked off the different outcomes was also mainly weighed by the admission TNF-α levels. For the first time, we have carefully developed probability functions for the neurological outcome as a response to the admission TNF-α levels; TNF-α levels >110.35 pg/mL were assessed as an optimal cutoff point fairly identifying patients who will fall into the group with poor outcome.
TNF-α based models and admission TNF-α screening might be appropriate as a key component that assists more objective prognostication and management of patient's care in clinical decision making, as rapid initial diagnosis and concentrated management are crucial for secondary prevention of further devastating neurological impairments after ICH.
脑出血(ICH)的预后模型主要基于临床评估,一直受到主观评分评估和有限准确性的固有困扰。在本研究中,我们旨在基于外周生化标志物(肿瘤坏死因子-α、谷氨酸和葡萄糖)和放射学变量(入院时和患者治疗五天后)评估脑出血后不良预后的风险,用于预后建模。
五十名在住院过程中无严重并发症(如脑室内出血或血肿扩大)的非昏迷保守治疗脑出血患者的定义初始变量与重新评估(3个月后)时的评估参数一致。通过使用不同的建模策略来预测其功能状态和结局,应用了一种综合统计方法。
入院时较高的血浆谷氨酸、肿瘤坏死因子-α和初始脑出血体积,以及治疗五天后较大的脑出血和血肿周围水肿体积与不良结局显著相关。然而,在所有构建的模型中,肿瘤坏死因子-α被估计为唯一显著的预测风险因素,因此在功能状态和3个月神经学结局的预后方面,其表现优于初始脑出血体积和五天后的放射学变量。区分不同结局的构建规范变量也主要由入院时肿瘤坏死因子-α水平加权。我们首次精心制定了神经学结局的概率函数,作为对入院时肿瘤坏死因子-α水平的反应;肿瘤坏死因子-α水平>110.35 pg/mL被评估为一个最佳切点,能很好地识别将归入不良结局组的患者。
基于肿瘤坏死因子-α的模型和入院时肿瘤坏死因子-α筛查可能适合作为一个关键组成部分,有助于在临床决策中更客观地进行预后评估和患者护理管理,因为快速的初始诊断和集中管理对于脑出血后进一步严重神经损伤的二级预防至关重要。