• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs in correctional facilities in the Netherlands: a study protocol of a quasi-experimental trial.荷兰细胞犬在荷兰管教设施中的有效性:一项准实验性试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1797-5.
2
Brief report: The effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs: A multiple case experimental study.简要报告:荷兰细胞犬的有效性:一项多案例实验研究。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;25(4):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/1359104520940744. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
3
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Prison: Experiences of Inmates, Instructors, and Prison Staff.监狱中基于正念减压疗法:囚犯、教员和监狱工作人员的体验
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 Nov-Dec;63(15-16):2550-2571. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19856232. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
4
A Quasi-Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs in Incarcerated Youth.荷兰“细胞犬”在监禁青少年中有效性的准实验研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Apr;65(5):644-666. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20983748. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
A multimodal day treatment program for multi-problem young adults: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一项针对多问题青年成年人的多模式日间治疗项目:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 May 19;18(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1950-3.
6
Group climate and empathy in a sample of incarcerated boys.在一群被监禁男孩样本中的群体氛围与同理心。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012 Dec;56(8):1149-60. doi: 10.1177/0306624X11421649. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
7
"Purely for You": Inmates' Perceptions of Prison Visitation by Volunteers in the Netherlands.《“只为你”:荷兰囚犯对志愿者监狱探访的看法》
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Oct;62(14):4545-4564. doi: 10.1177/0306624X18764523. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Procedural justice in prison: the importance of staff characteristics.监狱中的程序正义:工作人员特征的重要性。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Apr;59(4):337-58. doi: 10.1177/0306624X13512767. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
9
10
Study protocol: Hybrid Type I cost-effectiveness and implementation study of interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) for men and women prisoners with major depression.研究方案:针对患有重度抑郁症的男性和女性囚犯的人际心理治疗(IPT)的混合型I类成本效益与实施研究。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar;47:266-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A Friend in Prison: Human-Animal Bond, Stress and Self-Esteem of Detained Juveniles in Dutch Cell Dogs.狱中挚友:荷兰“囚室犬”项目中被拘留青少年的人犬关系、压力与自尊
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 3;12(5):646. doi: 10.3390/ani12050646.
2
A Quasi-Experimental Study on the Effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs in Incarcerated Youth.荷兰“细胞犬”在监禁青少年中有效性的准实验研究。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2021 Apr;65(5):644-666. doi: 10.1177/0306624X20983748. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
Brief report: The effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs: A multiple case experimental study.简要报告:荷兰细胞犬的有效性:一项多案例实验研究。
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;25(4):1015-1021. doi: 10.1177/1359104520940744. Epub 2020 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Concurrent and Predictive Validity of the Instrument for Forensic Treatment Evaluation: From Risk Assessment to Routine, Multidisciplinary Treatment Evaluation.法医治疗评估工具的同时效度和预测效度:从风险评估到常规多学科治疗评估
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Apr;62(5):1281-1299. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16676100. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
2
Family-Centered Care in Juvenile Justice Institutions: A Mixed Methods Study Protocol.少年司法机构中的家庭中心护理:一项混合方法研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Sep 12;5(3):e177. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5938.
3
A Systematic Review of Criminal Recidivism Rates Worldwide: Current Difficulties and Recommendations for Best Practice.全球犯罪累犯率的系统评价:当前困难与最佳实践建议
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0130390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130390. eCollection 2015.
4
Motor, affective and cognitive empathy in adolescence: Interrelations between facial electromyography and self-reported trait and state measures.青少年的运动、情感和认知共情:面部肌电图与自我报告的特质及状态测量之间的相互关系。
Cogn Emot. 2016;30(4):745-61. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1027665. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
5
A longitudinal biosocial study of cortisol and peer influence on the development of adolescent antisocial behavior.纵向生物社会研究皮质醇和同伴对青少年反社会行为发展的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013 Nov;38(11):2770-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Psychosocial and psychophysiological effects of human-animal interactions: the possible role of oxytocin.人类与动物互动的心理社会和心理生理影响:催产素的潜在作用。
Front Psychol. 2012 Jul 9;3:234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00234. eCollection 2012.
7
Measuring treatment motivation in secure juvenile facilities.在青少年安全教养机构中衡量治疗动机。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2013 Aug;57(8):996-1008. doi: 10.1177/0306624X12443798. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
Verbal, facial and autonomic responses to empathy-eliciting film clips by disruptive male adolescents with high versus low callous-unemotional traits.对具有高或低冷酷无情特质的破坏型男性青少年的同理心诱发电影片段的言语、面部和自主反应。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Feb;40(2):211-23. doi: 10.1007/s10802-011-9557-8.
9
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.缺失数据分析:使其在现实世界中发挥作用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:549-76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.
10
Does the emotional go/no-go task really measure behavioral inhibition? Convergence with measures on a non-emotional analog.情绪性停止信号任务真的能测量行为抑制吗?与非情绪性类似任务测量结果的一致性。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Feb;22(2):151-60. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.001. Epub 2007 Jan 4.

荷兰细胞犬在荷兰管教设施中的有效性:一项准实验性试验的研究方案。

The effectiveness of Dutch Cell Dogs in correctional facilities in the Netherlands: a study protocol of a quasi-experimental trial.

机构信息

Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Child and Adolescent Studies, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 5;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1797-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-018-1797-5
PMID:29976174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6034307/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many former inmates recidivate, resulting in high costs for societies worldwide. Evidence based treatment practices may not work in prisons, due to detainees' lacking motivation, impaired well-being, and an unsafe group environment. One attempt to improve social group climate and well-being is the use of Prison-based Animal Programs (PAP). Using a quasi-experimental design, the aim of the current study is to examine the effectiveness of one such PAP in the Netherlands: Dutch Cell Dogs (DCD).

METHODS/DESIGN: Participants (N = 256) from 12 justice centers, including psychiatric, juvenile and adult facilities, will be recruited. Half of the sample (n = 128) will receive DCD training after voluntarily signing up (intervention group); The other half (n = 128) will be recruited to participate in the research and receive treatment-as-usual (TAU/Ccomparison group). Factors related to psychosocial functioning (e.g., self-esteem, empathy, self-control, life satisfaction, attention) and general therapeutic factors (i.e., therapeutic alliance, treatment motivation), expected to contribute to treatment success, will be assessed to measure the effectiveness of DCD. In addition, behavioral problems will be measured as well as recidivism rates. Questionnaires and neuropsychological tests will be employed to measure aforementioned outcome variables. Moreover, physiological data, based on heart rate and cortisol measures, will be collected to provide insight into the functioning of participants' physiological stress response and to determine whether stress reduction occurs over time. Multimethod data collection will occur at pre-training (T1), at 1-month (halfway training/T2), at 2-months (end training/T3), and 6-months after the end of the training (follow up/T4).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to examine the effectiveness of a widely implemented PAP in the Netherlands. Challenges associated with conducting the proposed study are typical for practice based research in correctional settings (e.g., a demanding workload of staff, lack of motivation to participate in research). Study results on the effects of a PAP will have an impact on inmates, justice centers, and municipalities across the Netherlands.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. The Netherlands National Trial Register TC = 6894 .

摘要

背景

许多前囚犯会再次犯罪,给全世界的社会造成高昂的代价。由于被拘留者缺乏动机、幸福感受损以及不安全的群体环境,基于证据的治疗实践在监狱中可能无法发挥作用。一种改善社会群体氛围和幸福感的尝试是利用监狱动物项目(PAP)。本研究采用准实验设计,旨在检验荷兰的一种此类 PAP(荷兰牢房犬(DCD))的有效性。

方法/设计:将从 12 个司法中心(包括精神病、青少年和成人设施)招募参与者(N=256)。样本的一半(n=128)将在自愿报名后接受 DCD 培训(干预组);另一半(n=128)将被招募参与研究并接受常规治疗(TAU/C比较组)。将评估与心理社会功能相关的因素(例如自尊、同理心、自我控制、生活满意度、注意力)和一般治疗因素(即治疗联盟、治疗动机),这些因素预计将有助于治疗成功,以衡量 DCD 的效果。此外,还将测量行为问题和累犯率。将采用问卷和神经心理学测试来衡量上述结果变量。此外,还将收集生理数据,基于心率和皮质醇测量,以深入了解参与者生理应激反应的功能,并确定随着时间的推移是否会发生应激减轻。多方法数据收集将在培训前(T1)、培训期间的第 1 个月(T2)、第 2 个月(T3)和培训结束后的第 6 个月(T4)进行。

讨论

这是第一项检验荷兰广泛实施的 PAP 有效性的研究。与在惩教环境中进行拟议研究相关的挑战是实践基础研究中常见的挑战(例如,工作人员的工作量大,缺乏参与研究的动机)。关于 PAP 效果的研究结果将对荷兰的囚犯、司法中心和市政当局产生影响。

试验注册

回溯注册。荷兰国家试验注册 TC=6894。