Suppr超能文献

两种不同色谱方法在存在杂质情况下定量测定醋酸氢化可的松和盐酸普鲁卡因的比较研究。

Comparative study of two different chromatographic approaches for quantitation of hydrocortisone acetate and pramoxine hydrochloride in presence of their impurities.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.

Department of Agro-Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Bioresource and Bioenviromental Sciences, Kyushu University, 812-8581, Japan.

出版信息

J Food Drug Anal. 2018 Jul;26(3):1160-1170. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 17.

Abstract

In the present study, we compare the performance of two reversed-phase liquid chromatographic approaches using different eluents either conventional hydro-organic eluent or micellar one for simultaneous estimation of hydrocortisone acetate and pramoxine hydrochloride in presence of their degradants and process-related impurities; hydrocortisone and 4-butoxyphenol, respectively. For conventional reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC), separation of the studied compounds was completed on an Inertsil ODS 3-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) with a mobile phase consists of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 5.0): acetonitrile (50: 50, v/v). For micellar liquid chromatography (MLC), an Eclipse XDB-C8 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) was chosen for the separation with a green mobile phase consists of 0.15 M sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.3% triethylamine and 10% n-butanol in 20 mM orthophosphoric acid (pH 5.0). Both methods were extended to analyze hydrocortisone acetate and pramoxine hydrochloride in their co-formulated cream. RPLC was superior to MLC with regard to sensitivity for the estimation of impurities. While, MLC represents an eco-friendly, less hazardous and biodegradable approach. Furthermore, the direct injection of the cream to the system without the need to laborious samples pretreatment, excessive amount of analysis time and/or use of large amount of toxic organic solvents is one of the outstanding advantages of MLC.

摘要

在本研究中,我们比较了两种反相液相色谱方法的性能,分别使用不同的洗脱液,常规的水-有机洗脱液或胶束洗脱液,用于同时估计醋酸氢化可的松和盐酸普莫卡因在其降解产物和工艺相关杂质存在下的浓度;分别为氢化可的松和 4-丁氧基苯酚。对于常规反相液相色谱(RPLC),研究化合物的分离是在 Inertsil ODS 3-C18 柱(150mm×4.6mm,5μm 粒径)上完成的,流动相由 50mM 磷酸盐缓冲液(pH5.0):乙腈(50:50,v/v)组成。对于胶束液相色谱(MLC),选择 Eclipse XDB-C8 柱(150mm×4.6mm,5μm 粒径)用于分离,绿色流动相由 0.15M 十二烷基硫酸钠、0.3%三乙胺和 10%正丁醇在 20mM 正磷酸(pH5.0)中组成。这两种方法都被扩展用于分析其共制剂乳膏中的醋酸氢化可的松和盐酸普莫卡因。与 MLC 相比,RPLC 在估计杂质时具有更高的灵敏度。而 MLC 则代表了一种环保、低危害和可生物降解的方法。此外,无需繁琐的样品预处理、大量的分析时间和/或使用大量有毒有机溶剂,直接将乳膏注入系统是 MLC 的突出优点之一。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3a4/9303017/f286a0e44cbb/jfda-26-03-1160f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验