• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

化疗治疗晚期肺鳞状细胞癌的预处理淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值作为预后标志物

Pretreatment Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker for Advanced Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemotherapy.

作者信息

Minami Seigo, Ihara Shouichi, Komuta Kiyoshi

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543-0035, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med Res. 2018 Aug;10(8):657-664. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3490w. Epub 2018 Jun 27.

DOI:10.14740/jocmr3490w
PMID:29977424
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6031246/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS) 2 have been demonstrated as independent prognostic markers for poor prognosis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about these three markers as prognostic markers for a specific histological subset of NSCLC, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of LMR, NLR and mGPS for advanced SCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 107 patients who met the following criteria: pathologically confirmed SCC, chemo-naive patients who had initiated first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy between September 2007 and February 2017 at our institution, and c-stage IIIB, IV or recurrence after curative-intent surgery or thoracic radiotherapy. In order to demonstrate these three markers as significant prognostic factors, we compared overall survival (OS) between two groups divided by LMR, NLR and mGPS 0 - 1 versus 2, and performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses.

RESULTS

Groups with low LMR (< 2.07) and high NLR (≥ 5.28) experienced shorter OS (LMR: 6.5 versus 15.6 months in median, P < 0.01; NLR: 8.2 versus 15.6 months, P < 0.01) than groups with high LMR (≥ 2.07) and low NLR (< 5.28). However, no significant difference was detected in OS between mGPS 0 - 1 and 2 (13.0 versus 13.7 months, P = 0.61). As significant poor prognostic factors, our multivariate Cox hazard analysis detected ECOG PS 2 - 4 (hazard ration (HR): 3.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.77 - 5.40; P < 0.01) and LMR < 2.07 (HR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21 - 0.79; P < 0.01). However, NLR was not selected in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

LMR is an independent prognostic factor for advanced pulmonary SCC. Neither NLR nor mGPS is useful as prognostic factor for this histology. The optimal prognostic markers may differ from each subset of NSCLC.

摘要

背景

较低的淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、较高的中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)以及改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)≥2已被证明是晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)预后不良的独立预后标志物。然而,对于这三种标志物作为NSCLC特定组织学亚组——鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的预后标志物,人们了解甚少。本研究旨在评估LMR、NLR和mGPS对晚期SCC的预后意义。

方法

我们回顾性收集了107例符合以下标准的患者:病理确诊为SCC,2007年9月至2017年2月在我院开始一线细胞毒性化疗的初治患者,以及c期IIIB、IV期或根治性手术或胸部放疗后复发的患者。为了证明这三种标志物是显著的预后因素,我们比较了根据LMR、NLR和mGPS分为0 - 1与≥2的两组患者的总生存期(OS),并进行了单因素和多因素Cox比例风险分析。

结果

LMR低(<2.07)和NLR高(≥5.28)的组的OS较短(LMR:中位生存期6.5个月对15.6个月,P<0.01;NLR:8.2个月对15.6个月,P<0.01),而LMR高(≥2.07)和NLR低(<5.28)的组。然而,mGPS 0 - 1和≥2的组之间在OS上未检测到显著差异(13.0个月对13.7个月,P = 0.61)。作为显著的不良预后因素,我们的多因素Cox风险分析检测到ECOG PS 2 - 4(风险比(HR):3.09,95%置信区间(CI):1.77 - 5.40;P<0.01)和LMR<2.07(HR:0.39,95%CI:0.21 - 0.79;P<0.01)。然而,NLR在多因素分析中未被选中。

结论

LMR是晚期肺SCC的独立预后因素。NLR和mGPS均不能作为该组织学类型的预后因素。最佳预后标志物可能因NSCLC的每个亚组而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a8/6031246/e01d741014c1/jocmr-10-657-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a8/6031246/8b9b6b659b64/jocmr-10-657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a8/6031246/e01d741014c1/jocmr-10-657-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a8/6031246/8b9b6b659b64/jocmr-10-657-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/43a8/6031246/e01d741014c1/jocmr-10-657-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Pretreatment Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker for Advanced Pulmonary Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Chemotherapy.化疗治疗晚期肺鳞状细胞癌的预处理淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值作为预后标志物
J Clin Med Res. 2018 Aug;10(8):657-664. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3490w. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
2
Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score Predict Prognosis of Lung Adenocarcinoma Without Driver Mutation.淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值及改良格拉斯哥预后评分预测无驱动基因突变的肺腺癌预后
World J Oncol. 2018 Feb;9(1):13-20. doi: 10.14740/wjon1084w. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
3
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测携带表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期。
World J Oncol. 2017 Dec;8(6):180-187. doi: 10.14740/wjon1069w. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Combined prognostic value of the SUVmax derived from FDG-PET and the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.联合 FDG-PET 摄取的 SUVmax 和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比值在接受化疗的 IIIB-IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07784-x.
5
Comparison of selected inflammation-based prognostic markers in relapsed or refractory metastatic colorectal cancer patients.复发或难治性转移性结直肠癌患者中基于炎症的选定预后标志物的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov 21;21(43):12410-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i43.12410.
6
Clinical and prognostic significance of preoperative lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-monocyte ratio on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.术前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值及中性粒细胞与单核细胞比值对食管鳞状细胞癌患者的临床及预后意义
Transl Cancer Res. 2020 Jun;9(6):3903-3914. doi: 10.21037/tcr-19-2777.
7
Prognostic biomarkers in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI).IV期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的预后生物标志物:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值(LMR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)以及晚期肺癌炎症指数(ALI)。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(6):886-894. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.16.
8
Pre-radiosurgery leucocyte ratios and modified glasgow prognostic score predict survival in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases patients.放疗前白细胞比值和改良格拉斯哥预后评分可预测非小细胞肺癌脑转移患者的生存。
J Neurooncol. 2021 Jan;151(2):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s11060-020-03660-z. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
9
Systemic Inflammatory Markers of Survival in Epidermal Growth Factor-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis.表皮生长因子突变型非小细胞肺癌生存的系统炎症标志物:单机构分析、系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2021 Sep;22(5):390-407. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
10
The Peripheral Blood Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte Ratio Is Superior to the Lymphocyte-To-Monocyte Ratio for Predicting the Long-Term Survival of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients.外周血中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在预测三阴性乳腺癌患者长期生存方面优于淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 18;10(11):e0143061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143061. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
High circulating activin A plasma levels are associated with tumour stage and poor survival in treatment-naive lung squamous cell cancer patients.在未经治疗的肺鳞状细胞癌患者中,循环血中激活素A的高水平与肿瘤分期及较差的生存率相关。
Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan;51:102153. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102153. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
2
Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic predictor for patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy.单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值是接受立体定向体部放疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的预后预测指标。
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024 Jun 6;29(2):228-235. doi: 10.5603/rpor.100168. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Overall Survival of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测携带表皮生长因子受体突变的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期。
World J Oncol. 2017 Dec;8(6):180-187. doi: 10.14740/wjon1069w. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
2
Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score and prognostic nutritional index predict overall survival of patients with advanced small cell lung cancer.治疗前格拉斯哥预后评分和预后营养指数可预测晚期小细胞肺癌患者的总生存期。
Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2017 Dec 8;8:249-257. doi: 10.2147/LCTT.S142880. eCollection 2017.
3
Characterization of blood inflammatory markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
非小细胞肺癌患者血液炎症标志物的特征分析
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2024 May 15;17(5):165-172. doi: 10.62347/IPTW9741. eCollection 2024.
4
Correlation of immune inflammatory indices and nutritional risk index with prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者免疫炎症指标及营养风险指数与预后的相关性
Am J Transl Res. 2023 Jun 15;15(6):4100-4109. eCollection 2023.
5
Prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in patients with advanced oral cavity cancer.晚期口腔癌患者治疗前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值的预后价值
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2022 Mar 30;7(3):740-745. doi: 10.1002/lio2.790. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.治疗前淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值对肺癌的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Jan-Dec;20:1533033820983085. doi: 10.1177/1533033820983085.
7
Combined prognostic value of the SUVmax derived from FDG-PET and the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.联合 FDG-PET 摄取的 SUVmax 和淋巴细胞-单核细胞比值在接受化疗的 IIIB-IV 期非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后价值。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07784-x.
8
Translational immune correlates of indirect antibody immunization in a randomized phase II study using scheduled combination therapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel plus oregovomab in ovarian cancer patients.在一项使用卡铂/紫杉醇联合奥戈伏单抗的序贯联合治疗方案的随机 II 期研究中,间接抗体免疫接种的转化免疫相关性,用于卵巢癌患者。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 Mar;69(3):383-397. doi: 10.1007/s00262-019-02456-z. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
9
Prognostic value of the neutrophil-lymphocyte, platelet-lymphocyte and monocyte-lymphocyte ratio in breast cancer patients.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞、血小板与淋巴细胞及单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值在乳腺癌患者中的预后价值
Oncol Lett. 2019 Dec;18(6):6275-6283. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10966. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
10
Prognostic role of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: a meta-analysis.治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在接受全身治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的预后作用:一项荟萃分析。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019 Jun;8(3):214-226. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.06.10.
The impact of de novo liver metastasis on clinical outcome in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
新发肝转移对晚期非小细胞肺癌患者临床结局的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 7;12(6):e0178676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178676. eCollection 2017.
4
Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a marker of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.治疗前中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值作为纳武单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者预后的标志物。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Apr;106:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Trends in Lung Cancer Incidence Rates by Histological Type in 1975-2008: A Population-Based Study in Osaka, Japan.1975 - 2008年日本大阪基于人群的研究:按组织学类型划分的肺癌发病率趋势
J Epidemiol. 2016 Nov 5;26(11):579-586. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20150257. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
6
Neutrophils in the Tumor Microenvironment.肿瘤微环境中的中性粒细胞
Trends Immunol. 2016 Jan;37(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
7
Baseline and Trend of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as Prognostic Factors in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors.作为一线表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗的表皮生长因子受体突变型非小细胞肺癌患者预后因素的淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值的基线和趋势
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136252. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136252. eCollection 2015.
8
Prognostic value of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in lung cancer: A meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在肺癌中的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Jul;70(7):524-30. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(07)10. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
9
Prognostic significance of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在非小细胞肺癌中的预后意义:一项荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 24;5:12493. doi: 10.1038/srep12493.
10
Prognostic significance of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis.非小细胞肺癌患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值的预后意义:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Mar 15;8(3):3098-106. eCollection 2015.