• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察三个南亚国家在提供分娩服务方面的水平不公平和不平等的社会决定因素。

Examining horizontal inequity and social determinants of inequality in facility delivery services in three South Asian countries.

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010416. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010416.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.08.010416
PMID:29977529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6008508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The utilization of maternal health care services has increased in many developing countries, but persistent wealth-related inequalities in use of maternal services remained an important public health issue. The paper examined the horizontal inequities and identified the key social determinants that can potentially explain such wealth-related inequalities in use of facility delivery services.

METHODS

The countries studied are Bangladesh, Pakistan and Nepal. We used horizontal inequity index to measure the horizontal inequity and decomposition of concentration index method to assess the contribution of different social determinants towards the wealth-related inequality. We have used household and women data from demographic and health surveys of Bangladesh (BDHS 2014), Pakistan (PDHS 2012-13) and Nepal (NDHS 2010-11).

RESULTS

All three countries showed pro-rich inequality in use of facility delivery services (Observed Concentration Index: Bangladesh = 0.235; Pakistan = 0.141; Nepal = 0.263). The study showed if the utilization were solely based on need factors there would have been little disparity between the rich and the poor (Need expected Concentration Index: Bangladesh = 0.004; Pakistan = 0.004; Nepal = 0.008). The use of facility delivery remained pro-rich in all three countries after taking the need factors into account (Horizontal inequity Index: Bangladesh = 0.231; Pakistan = 0.137; Nepal = 0.254). The decomposition analysis revealed that facility delivery is driven mostly by the social determinants of health rather than the individual health risk. Household socioeconomic condition, parental education, place of residence and parity emerged as the most important factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reiterates the importance of addressing social determinants of health in tackling wealth-related inequalities in use of facility delivery services. Health policy makers should acknowledge the importance of social determinants in determining individual health-seeking behaviour and accordingly set their strategies to improve access to facility delivery.

摘要

背景

许多发展中国家的孕产妇保健服务利用率有所提高,但服务利用方面持续存在的与财富相关的不平等现象仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题。本文研究了横向不平等,并确定了可能导致利用医疗机构分娩服务方面存在与财富相关不平等现象的关键社会决定因素。

方法

所研究的国家为孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和尼泊尔。我们使用水平不公平指数衡量水平不公平,并使用集中指数分解方法评估不同社会决定因素对与财富相关的不平等现象的贡献。我们使用了孟加拉国(BDHS 2014 年)、巴基斯坦(PDHS 2012-13 年)和尼泊尔(NDHS 2010-11 年)人口与健康调查中的家庭和妇女数据。

结果

这三个国家的医疗机构分娩服务利用均存在有利于富人的不平等现象(观察到的集中指数:孟加拉国=0.235;巴基斯坦=0.141;尼泊尔=0.263)。研究表明,如果服务的利用完全基于需求因素,那么贫富之间的差距将会很小(需求预期集中指数:孟加拉国=0.004;巴基斯坦=0.004;尼泊尔=0.008)。在考虑到需求因素后,所有三个国家的医疗机构分娩服务的利用仍然有利于富人(水平不公平指数:孟加拉国=0.231;巴基斯坦=0.137;尼泊尔=0.254)。分解分析表明,医疗机构分娩主要受健康的社会决定因素驱动,而不是个人健康风险。家庭社会经济状况、父母教育程度、居住地和生育子女数成为最重要的因素。

结论

本研究再次强调,在解决利用医疗机构分娩服务方面与财富相关的不平等现象时,应重视健康的社会决定因素。卫生政策制定者应认识到社会决定因素在确定个人寻求卫生服务行为方面的重要性,并据此制定改善获得医疗机构分娩服务的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/a2f266fd8978/jogh-08-010416-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/cb7b1769211b/jogh-08-010416-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/c712f8490485/jogh-08-010416-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/a2f266fd8978/jogh-08-010416-F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/cb7b1769211b/jogh-08-010416-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/c712f8490485/jogh-08-010416-F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5463/6008508/a2f266fd8978/jogh-08-010416-F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining horizontal inequity and social determinants of inequality in facility delivery services in three South Asian countries.考察三个南亚国家在提供分娩服务方面的水平不公平和不平等的社会决定因素。
J Glob Health. 2018 Jun;8(1):010416. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010416.
2
Factors influencing place of delivery: Evidence from three south-Asian countries.影响分娩地点的因素:来自三个南亚国家的证据。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0250012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250012. eCollection 2021.
3
Expansion in the private sector provision of institutional delivery services and horizontal equity: evidence from Nepal and Bangladesh.私营部门提供机构分娩服务的扩展与横向公平:来自尼泊尔和孟加拉国的证据。
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Jul;29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i12-9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt062.
4
Levels of and changes in socioeconomic inequality in delivery care service: A decomposition analysis using Bangladesh Demographic Health Surveys.分娩护理服务中社会经济不平等的水平和变化:利用孟加拉国人口健康调查进行的分解分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242325. eCollection 2020.
5
Exploring the factors behind socioeconomic inequalities in Antenatal Care (ANC) utilization across five South Asian natiaons: A decomposition approach.探索五个南亚国家中产前护理(ANC)利用方面社会经济不平等的背后因素:一种分解方法。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0304648. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304648. eCollection 2024.
6
Progress in the utilization of antenatal and delivery care services in Bangladesh: where does the equity gap lie?孟加拉国产前和分娩护理服务利用情况的进展:公平差距在哪里?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jul 29;16(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-0970-4.
7
Equitable health services for the young? A decomposition of income-related inequalities in young adults' utilization of health care in Northern Sweden.为年轻人提供公平的医疗服务?瑞典北部年轻人医疗保健利用方面与收入相关的不平等分解
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Jan 18;16(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0520-3.
8
Examining trends in inequality in the use of reproductive health care services in Ghana and Nigeria.探讨加纳和尼日利亚生殖保健服务使用不平等趋势。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Dec 13;18(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2102-9.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in utilizing facility delivery in Bangladesh: A decomposition analysis using nationwide 2017-2018 demographic and health survey data.孟加拉国利用医疗机构分娩的社会经济不平等:利用全国 2017-2018 年人口和健康调查数据进行的分解分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 28;17(11):e0278093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278093. eCollection 2022.
10
Explaining inequity in the use of institutional delivery services in selected countries.解释部分国家机构分娩服务使用方面的不平等现象。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Apr;19(4):755-63. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1561-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequality in Utilization of Maternal Healthcare Services in Low‑ and Middle‑Income Countries: A Scoping Review of the Literature.低收入和中等收入国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:文献综述
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04111-9.
2
Socio-economic and geographic equity in maternal health services utilization in Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚孕产妇保健服务利用中的社会经济和地理公平性:一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 26;25(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12639-3.
3
Population-level trends over a decade in geographical inequality for opportunity in access to maternal care services: a cross-sectional analysis from the National Family Health Surveys in India.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden Costs of Hospital Based Delivery from Two Tertiary Hospitals in Western Nepal.尼泊尔西部两家三级医院基于医院分娩的隐性成本
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0157746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157746. eCollection 2016.
2
Institutional Delivery and Satisfaction among Indigenous and Poor Women in Guatemala, Mexico, and Panama.危地马拉、墨西哥和巴拿马的原住民及贫困妇女的机构分娩情况与满意度
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 27;11(4):e0154388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154388. eCollection 2016.
3
Factors Influencing Health Facility Delivery in Predominantly Rural Communities across the Three Ecological Zones in Ghana: A Cross-Sectional Study.
在接受孕产妇护理服务方面,机会的地域不平等程度在十年间的人口水平趋势:来自印度国家家庭健康调查的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 21;14(11):e083922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083922.
4
Inequity in uptake of maternal health care services in developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.发展中国家孕产妇保健服务利用的不平等:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 26;12:1415092. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1415092. eCollection 2024.
5
Prevalence and determinants of socioeconomic inequality in caesarean section deliveries in Bangladesh: an analysis of cross-sectional data from Bangladesh Demographic Health Survey, 2017-18.孟加拉国剖宫产率的社会经济不平等状况及其决定因素:来自 2017-18 年孟加拉国人口健康调查的横断面数据分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jul 4;23(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05782-4.
6
Comparison of inequality in utilization of postnatal care services between Bangladesh and Pakistan: Evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.孟加拉国和巴基斯坦利用产后护理服务不平等的比较:来自 2017-2018 年人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 22;23(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05778-0.
7
Comparison of inequality in utilization of maternal healthcare services between Bangladesh and Pakistan: evidence from the demographic health survey 2017-2018.孟加拉国和巴基斯坦利用母婴保健服务不平等的比较:来自 2017-2018 年人口健康调查的证据。
Reprod Health. 2023 Mar 13;20(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12978-023-01595-y.
8
High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?在覆盖范围的传递过程中,孕产妇和新生儿健康服务的高覆盖率与低质量:在尼泊尔,谁受益于获得更高质量的卫生服务,而谁又被甩在后面?
Reprod Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01465-z.
9
Horizontal inequity in the utilisation of Continuum of Maternal Health care Services (CMHS) in India: an investigation of ten years of National Rural Health Mission (NRHM).印度连续母婴保健服务(CMHS)利用中的水平不公平:对国家农村卫生使命(NRHM)十年的调查。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 15;21(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01602-3.
10
Predictors of wealth-related inequality in institutional delivery: a decomposition analysis using Nepal multiple Indicator cluster survey (MICS) 2019.预测机构分娩中与财富相关的不平等现象的因素:利用尼泊尔 2019 年多指标类集调查(MICS)进行的分解分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;21(1):2246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12287-2.
加纳三个生态区主要农村社区卫生设施分娩的影响因素:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152235. eCollection 2016.
4
Institutional Delivery Service Utilization among Women from Rural Districts of Wolaita and Dawro Zones, Southern Ethiopia; a Community Based Cross-Sectional Study.埃塞俄比亚南部沃莱塔和达沃罗地区农村妇女的机构分娩服务利用情况;一项基于社区的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151082. eCollection 2016.
5
Determinants of antenatal care, institutional delivery and postnatal care services utilization in Nigeria.尼日利亚产前护理、机构分娩及产后护理服务利用情况的决定因素。
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Aug 31;21:321. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2015.21.321.6527. eCollection 2015.
6
Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group.1990年至2015年全球、区域和国家层面的孕产妇死亡率及趋势,以及基于情景的2030年预测:联合国孕产妇死亡率估计机构间小组的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
7
The Prevalence of Skilled Birth Attendant Utilization and Its Correlates in North West Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚西北部熟练接生员的使用情况及其相关因素
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:436938. doi: 10.1155/2015/436938. Epub 2015 Oct 4.
8
Missed opportunities for institutional delivery and associated factors among urban resident pregnant women in South Tigray Zone, Ethiopia: a community-based follow-up study.埃塞俄比亚南提格雷地区城市居民孕妇的机构分娩错失机会及相关因素:一项基于社区的随访研究
Glob Health Action. 2015 Sep 9;8:28082. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.28082. eCollection 2015.
9
Household coping strategies for delivery and related healthcare cost: findings from rural Bangladesh.孟加拉国农村地区分娩及相关医疗保健费用的家庭应对策略:研究结果
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Oct;20(10):1368-75. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12546. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
Accelerating health equity: the key role of universal health coverage in the Sustainable Development Goals.加速健康公平:全民健康覆盖在可持续发展目标中的关键作用。
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 29;13:101. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0342-3.