Casalino Lawrence P, Ramsay Patricia, Baker Laurence C, Pesko Michael F, Shortell Stephen M
Division of Health Policy and Economics, Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Center for Healthcare Organizational and Innovation Research (CHOIR), School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4970-4996. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13010. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
To estimate the relationship between outcomes of care and medical practices' structure and use of organized care improvement processes.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: We linked Medicare claims data to our national survey of physician practices (2012-2013). Fifty percent response rate; 1,040 responding practices; 31,888 physicians; 868,213 attributed Medicare beneficiaries.
Cross-sectional observational analysis of the relationship between practice characteristics and total spending, readmissions, and ambulatory care-sensitive admissions (ACSAs), for all beneficiaries and five categories of beneficiary defined by predicted need for care.
Practices with 100+ physicians and 50-99 physicians had, respectively, annual spending per high-need beneficiary that was $1,870 (12.5 percent) and $1,824 higher than practices with 1-2 physicians, and readmission rates 1.64 and 1.71 higher. ACSA rates did not vary significantly by practice size. Outcomes did not vary significantly by ownership or by practices' use of organized processes to improve care.
Large practices had higher spending and readmission rates than the smallest practices, especially for high-need beneficiaries. There were no significant performance differences between physician-owned and hospital-owned practices. Policy makers should consider the effects of specific policies on provider organization, pending further research to learn which types of practice provide better care.
评估医疗护理结果与医疗实践结构以及有组织的护理改进流程的使用之间的关系。
数据来源/研究背景:我们将医疗保险索赔数据与我们对医生执业情况的全国性调查(2012 - 2013年)相链接。回复率为50%;1040个做出回复的执业机构;31888名医生;868213名归属医疗保险的受益人。
对所有受益人和按预测护理需求定义的五类受益人,就执业特征与总支出、再入院率及门诊护理敏感型入院(ACSA)之间的关系进行横断面观察分析。
拥有100名及以上医生的执业机构和拥有50 - 99名医生的执业机构,每位高需求受益人的年支出分别比拥有1 - 2名医生的执业机构高出1870美元(12.5%)和1824美元,再入院率分别高出1.64和1.71。ACSA率并未因执业机构规模而有显著差异。结果在所有权或执业机构对有组织的护理改进流程的使用方面没有显著差异。
大型执业机构比最小型的执业机构有更高的支出和再入院率,尤其是对于高需求受益人。医生所有的执业机构和医院所有的执业机构之间在绩效上没有显著差异。政策制定者在进一步研究以了解哪种类型的执业机构能提供更好的护理之前,应考虑特定政策对医疗服务提供者组织的影响。