Suppr超能文献

医疗保险门诊就诊支付改革对泌尿外科诊疗实践的影响。

Impact of Medicare Office Visit Payment Reform on Urologic Practices.

作者信息

Modi Parth K, Kaufman Samuel R, Caram Megan V, Ellimoottil Chad, Shahinian Vahakn B, Hollenbeck Brent K

机构信息

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI; Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI.

Division of Health Services Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, MI.

出版信息

Urology. 2019 Apr;126:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 2019 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, which modifies reimbursement for office evaluation and management (E&M) visits. This policy moves payment to a single rate for levels 2 through 4 office E&M visits, regardless of complexity.

METHODS

Using a 20% sample of 2015 National Medicare claims, we identified urologic practices and their practice organization, academic affiliation, and degree of office focus (ie, proportion of revenues from office visits). Using billing data for each practice, we calculated the revenues expected under the current system and the new policy (both E&M payments and a new add-on code). For each practice, we determined the impact of new payment rates on total Medicare payments.

RESULTS

We identified 2822 practices: 1372 (48.6%) solo practices, 1033 (36.6%) multispecialty groups, 322 (11.4%) small urology groups, and 95 (3.4%) large urology groups. Under the new reimbursement rates, the median practice would have a 0.9% increase in Medicare Part B payments (range -20.4% to +50.3%) and, with the add-on code, an increase of 6.8% (range -7.5% to +74.9%). Solo practices had the most heterogeneity, with a quarter losing at least 2.3%. The median multispecialty group would increase payments by 0.4% (range -13.7% to 50.3%). However, the 107 (10.4%) academic multispecialty groups had a median gain of only 0.1% (range -2.8% to +8.1%).

CONCLUSION

Urology groups would, on average, benefit from the anticipated change in Medicare office E&M visit payments. However, solo practices with a high office focus and academic multispecialty practices may see reduced Medicare payments.

摘要

目的

评估2019年医疗保险医师费率表,该表对门诊评估与管理(E&M)就诊的报销进行了调整。这项政策将2级至4级门诊E&M就诊的支付统一为单一费率,而不考虑诊疗的复杂程度。

方法

利用2015年全国医疗保险理赔数据的20%样本,我们确定了泌尿外科诊疗机构及其执业组织、学术隶属关系和门诊业务专注程度(即门诊收入占总收入的比例)。利用每个诊疗机构的计费数据,我们计算了现行系统和新政策下预期的收入(包括E&M支付和一个新的附加代码)。对于每个诊疗机构,我们确定了新支付费率对医疗保险总支付的影响。

结果

我们确定了2822个诊疗机构:1372个(48.6%)单人执业机构、1033个(36.6%)多专科团体、322个(11.4%)小型泌尿外科团体和95个(3.4%)大型泌尿外科团体。在新的报销费率下,各诊疗机构的医疗保险B部分支付中位数将增加0.9%(范围为-20.4%至+50.3%),加上附加代码后,将增加6.8%(范围为-7.5%至+74.9%)。单人执业机构的差异最大,四分之一的机构至少损失2.3%。多专科团体的支付中位数将增加0.4%(范围为-13.7%至50.3%)。然而,107个(10.4%)学术性多专科团体的支付中位数仅增加0.1%(范围为-2.8%至+8.1%)。

结论

泌尿外科团体平均将从医疗保险门诊E&M就诊支付的预期变化中受益。然而,高度专注于门诊业务的单人执业机构和学术性多专科诊疗机构的医疗保险支付可能会减少。

相似文献

1
Impact of Medicare Office Visit Payment Reform on Urologic Practices.
Urology. 2019 Apr;126:83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
3
Changes in Billing and Reimbursement for Urology Office Visits Before and After Medicare Payment Reforms.
Urol Pract. 2023 May;10(3):221-228. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000394. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Variations in Medicare Reimbursement in Radiation Oncology: An Analysis of the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Set.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Apr 1;94(5):1000-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.045. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
8
9
Medicare reimbursement changes for ambulatory surgery centers and remuneration to urological physician-owners.
J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1070-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.051. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
10
Unintended consequences of eliminating medicare payments for consultations.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14;173(1):15-21. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1125.

本文引用的文献

1
The CMS Proposal to Reform Office-Visit Payments.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1102-1104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1809742. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
2
Medical Group Characteristics and the Cost and Quality of Care for Medicare Beneficiaries.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec;53(6):4970-4996. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13010. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
3
Urologist Practice Affiliation and Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Elderly.
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):491-498. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
4
Town and Gown Differences Among the 100 Largest Medical Groups in the United States.
Acad Med. 2016 Jul;91(7):1007-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001240.
5
The map is not the territory: medical records and 21st century practice.
Lancet. 2016 Oct 22;388(10055):2053-2056. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00338-X. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
6
Revisiting E&M visit guidelines--a missing piece of payment reform.
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 19;364(20):1892-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1102099.
7
Which type of medical group provides higher-quality care?
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 5;145(11):860-1. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-11-200612050-00012.
8
New guidelines for coding physicians' services--a step backward.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1705-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392312.
9
Evaluation and management guidelines--fatally flawed.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1697-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392308.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验