Chiarella Mary, Satchell Claudette S, Nagy Marie, Carney Terry, Walton Merrilyn, Bennett Belinda, Kelly Patrick J
Professor, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
Project Manager, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.
J Law Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):357-379.
This study is part of a larger, Australian Research Council-funded project studying comparative analyses of complaints and notification handling between the NSW system and National Registration and Accreditation Scheme (2010). This article explores the assessments and decisions made by Tribunal and other quasi-judicial decision-makers involved in the two schemes, including the key decision-management stages during a disciplinary process. Respondents recruited from both systems completed an online questionnaire comprising a series of closed and open-ended questions to case vignettes. While we found no significant difference between jurisdictions in relation to their decision-making processes in this case, the article provides insights into the rationales for their decisions and the outcomes or sanctions selected by decision-makers as being appropriate to the circumstances presented.
本研究是澳大利亚研究理事会资助的一个更大项目的一部分，该项目研究新南威尔士州系统与国家注册与认证计划（2010年）之间投诉及通知处理的比较分析。本文探讨了参与这两个计划的法庭及其他准司法决策者所做的评估和决定，包括纪律处分过程中的关键决策管理阶段。从两个系统招募的受访者完成了一份在线问卷，问卷包含一系列针对案例 vignettes 的封闭式和开放式问题。虽然我们发现不同司法管辖区在本案的决策过程方面没有显著差异，但本文深入分析了其决策依据以及决策者针对所呈现情况选择的结果或制裁措施。
