School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Laboratory of Human Movement (LABIMH), Nursing and Bioscience Post-Graduation Program, Federal University of State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Jun;34(6):1591-1599. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002633.
Miranda, H, de Souza, JAAA, Scudese, E, Paz, GA, Salerno, VP, Vigário, PdS, and Willardson, JM. Acute hormone responses subsequent to agonist-antagonist paired set vs. traditional straight set resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 34(6): 1591-1599, 2020-The purpose of this study was to compare acute hormone responses and rating of perceived exertion (OMNI-Res) subsequent to the agonist-antagonist paired set (PS) vs. the traditional straight set (TS) resistance training method. Twelve recreationally trained men (25.7 ± 4.7 years, 173 ± 6.3 cm and 71.5 ± 6.6 kg) participated in the current study. After 10 repetition maximum (RM) load determination, each subject performed the following 2 experimental sessions in random order: TS session-3 sets of 10 repetitions at 85% of 10RM for the machine seated row and barbell bench press with 2-minute rest intervals between sets; and PS-3 sets of 10 repetitions with 85% of 10RM alternating machine seated row and barbell bench press for the total of 6 PSs with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. Total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), cortisol, TT/cortisol ratio, growth hormone (GH), and blood lactate concentrations were measured before workout and immediately after workout and 15 and 30 minutes after workout. The OMNI-RES was recorded at the end of each set for both exercises within each session. Under the TS session, TT significantly increased immediately post-workout vs. the pre-workout time point. For the PS session, TT significantly decreased at 30-minute post-workout vs. the immediate post-workout time point, whereas, FT significantly increased immediately post-workout and 15-minute post-workout vs. the pre-workout time point. For the TS session, GH significantly increased immediately post-workout, and at the 15- and 30-minute post-workout time points vs. the pre-workout time point, respectively. For the PS session, GH was significantly increased immediately post-workout vs. the pre-workout time point. Blood lactate significantly increased at all post-workout time points vs. the pre-workout time point under both sessions. The cortisol and TT/cortisol ratio showed no differences between sessions. In conclusion, from an acute standpoint, the TS approach showed a tendency to cause greater disruption in hormone levels, despite the lack of significant differences vs. the PS approach at all time points. However, both strategies may promote similar acute hormone responses.
米兰达，H，德索萨，JAAA，斯库德斯，E，帕兹，GA，萨尔内罗，VP，维加里奥，PdS，和威拉德森，JM。激动剂-拮抗剂配对与传统的直列式阻力训练后急性激素反应和感知用力（OMNI-Res）。J 力量与调理研究 34(6)：1591-1599，2020-本研究的目的是比较拮抗剂配对集（PS）与传统的直列式（TS）阻力训练方法后急性激素反应和感知用力（OMNI-Res）。12 名有经验的男性（25.7±4.7 岁，173±6.3cm 和 71.5±6.6kg）参加了本研究。在确定 10 次重复最大（RM）负荷后，每个受试者以随机顺序进行以下 2 个实验：TS 会话-3 组，每组 10 次重复，使用 85%的 10RM 进行机器坐姿划船和杠铃卧推，每组之间休息 2 分钟；PS-3 组，每组 10 次重复，使用 85%的 10RM 交替机器坐姿划船和杠铃卧推，总共 6 次 PS，每组之间休息 2 分钟。在训练前和训练后立即以及训练后 15 分钟和 30 分钟测量总睾酮（TT）、游离睾酮（FT）、皮质醇、TT/皮质醇比值、生长激素（GH）和血乳酸浓度。在每个会话的每个练习中，在每个组结束时记录 OMNI-RES。在 TS 会话中，TT 在训练后立即增加，与训练前的时间点相比。对于 PS 会话，TT 在 30 分钟后立即降低，而 FT 在训练后立即增加，在训练后 15 分钟增加，与训练前的时间点相比。对于 TS 会话，GH 在训练后立即增加，并且在训练后 15 分钟和 30 分钟的时间点与训练前的时间点相比，分别增加。对于 PS 会话，GH 在训练后立即增加，与训练前的时间点相比。在两次会话中，血乳酸在训练后所有时间点均高于训练前时间点。皮质醇和 TT/皮质醇比值在各时间点均无差异。总之，从急性角度来看，尽管与 PS 方法相比，TS 方法在所有时间点均未显示出明显差异，但 TS 方法似乎会导致更大的激素水平紊乱。然而，这两种策略都可能引起类似的急性激素反应。
