Paz Gabriel A, Robbins Daniel W, de Oliveira Carlos G, Bottaro Martim, Miranda Humberto
1School of Physical Education and Sports, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;2Laboratory of Biodynamic, Exercise, Health and Performance, Castelo Branco University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;3Center of Kinesiology and Performance, Biodesp Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;4Canadian Sport Center Pacific, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada; and5School of Physical Education, Brasilia University, Brasilia, Brazil.
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Oct;31(10):2777-2784. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001059.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effects of performing paired-set (PS) vs. traditional-set (TS) training over 3 consecutive sets, on volume load and electromyographic fatigue parameters of the latissimus dorsi, biceps brachii, pectoralis major, and triceps brachii muscles. Fifteen trained men performed 2 testing protocols (TS and PS) using 10 repetition maximum loads. The TS protocol consisted of 3 sets of bench press (BP) followed by 3 sets of wide-grip seated row (SR). The PS consisted of 3 sets of BP and 3 sets of SR performed in an alternating manner. Volume load was calculated as load × repetitions. The electromyographic signal, time (CRMS) and frequency (Cf5) domain, parameters were recorded during SR. Under the PS protocol, sets of SR were performed immediately after the sets of BP. A 2-minute rest interval between the completion of the set of SR and the subsequent set of BP was implemented (e.g., between PSs). Under the TS protocol, 2-minute rest intervals were implemented between all sets. BP and SR volume loads decreased significantly from set 1 to set 2 and from set 2 to set 3 under both conditions. Volume load was greater for all sets of both exercises under PS as compared with TS. Muscle fatigue indices were greater under PS as compared with TS. In general, these results indicate that as compared with TS, PS produced a greater training volume in less time and may induce greater fatigue and thereby provide an enhanced training stimulus.
本研究的目的是调查连续3组进行配对组(PS)训练与传统组(TS)训练对背阔肌、肱二头肌、胸大肌和肱三头肌的容量负荷和肌电图疲劳参数的急性影响。15名受过训练的男性使用10次重复最大负荷进行了2种测试方案(TS和PS)。TS方案包括3组卧推(BP),然后是3组宽握坐姿划船(SR)。PS方案包括以交替方式进行的3组BP和3组SR。容量负荷计算为负荷×重复次数。在SR过程中记录肌电信号、时域(CRMS)和频域(Cf5)参数。在PS方案下,SR组在BP组之后立即进行。在SR组完成与随后的BP组之间实施2分钟的休息间隔(例如,在PS组之间)。在TS方案下,所有组之间都实施2分钟的休息间隔。在两种情况下,BP和SR的容量负荷从第1组到第2组以及从第2组到第3组均显著下降。与TS相比,PS方案下两种练习的所有组的容量负荷都更大。与TS相比,PS方案下的肌肉疲劳指数更高。总体而言,这些结果表明,与TS相比,PS在更短的时间内产生了更大的训练量,并且可能会引起更大的疲劳,从而提供更强的训练刺激。