Herlopian Aline, Struck Aaron F, Rosenthal Eric, Westover Brandon M
Division of Epilepsy, Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A.
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul;35(4):279-294. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000466.
Despite being first described over 50 years ago, periodic discharges continue to generate controversy as to whether they are always, sometimes, or never "ictal." Investigators and clinicians have proposed adjunctive markers to help clarify this distinction-in particular measures of perfusion and metabolism. Here, we review the growing number of neuroimaging studies using Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, MRI diffusion, Magnetic resonance perfusion, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, and Magnetoencepgalography to gain further insight into the physiology and clinical significance of periodic discharges. To date, however, no definitive consensus exists regarding the features of periodic discharges that warrant treatment intensification. However, an emerging consilience among neuroimaging modalities suggests that periodic discharges can induce a hyperexcitatory state with associated hypermetabolism and hyperperfusion, which may result in local metabolic failure.
尽管早在50多年前就有相关描述,但周期性放电是否总是、有时或从不为“发作期”仍存在争议。研究人员和临床医生提出了辅助标志物来帮助厘清这一区别,尤其是灌注和代谢指标。在此,我们回顾了越来越多使用氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)、磁共振扩散成像、磁共振灌注成像、单光子发射计算机断层扫描和脑磁图的神经影像学研究,以进一步深入了解周期性放电的生理学和临床意义。然而,迄今为止,对于哪些周期性放电特征需要强化治疗尚无明确共识。不过,神经影像学检查方式之间新出现的一致性表明,周期性放电可诱发伴有代谢亢进和灌注增加的兴奋性过高状态,这可能导致局部代谢衰竭。