• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑损伤中的脑电图周期性放电和频率相关的脑组织缺氧。

Electroencephalographic Periodic Discharges and Frequency-Dependent Brain Tissue Hypoxia in Acute Brain Injury.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York.

Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia University, New York, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):301-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5325.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5325
PMID:28097330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5548418/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Periodic discharges (PDs) that do not meet seizure criteria, also termed the ictal interictal continuum, are pervasive on electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings after acute brain injury. However, their association with brain homeostasis and the need for clinical intervention remain unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether distinct PD patterns can be identified that, similar to electrographic seizures, cause brain tissue hypoxia, a measure of ongoing brain injury.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study included 90 comatose patients with high-grade spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage who underwent continuous surface (scalp) EEG (sEEG) recording and multimodality monitoring, including invasive measurements of intracortical (depth) EEG (dEEG), partial pressure of oxygen in interstitial brain tissue (Pbto2), and regional cerebral blood flow (CBF). Patient data were collected from June 1, 2006, to September 1, 2014, at a single tertiary care center. The retrospective analysis was performed from September 1, 2014, to May 1, 2016, with a hypothesis that the effect on brain tissue oxygenation was primarily dependent on the discharge frequency.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Electroencephalographic recordings were visually classified based on PD frequency and spatial distribution of discharges. Correlations between mean multimodality monitoring data and change-point analyses were performed to characterize electrophysiological changes by applying bootstrapping.

RESULTS

Of the 90 patients included in the study (26 men and 64 women; mean [SD] age, 55 [15] years), 32 (36%) had PDs on sEEG and dEEG recordings and 21 (23%) on dEEG recordings only. Frequencies of PDs ranged from 0.5 to 2.5 Hz. Median Pbto2 was 23 mm Hg without PDs compared with 16 mm Hg at 2.0 Hz and 14 mm Hg at 2.5 Hz (differences were significant for 0 vs 2.5 Hz based on bootstrapping). Change-point analysis confirmed a temporal association of high-frequency PD onset (≥2.0 Hz) and Pbto2 reduction (median normalized Pbto2 decreased by 25% 5-10 minutes after onset). Increased regional CBF of 21.0 mL/100 g/min for 0 Hz, 25.9 mL/100 g/min for 1.0 Hz, 27.5 mL/100 g/min for 1.5 Hz, and 34.7 mL/100 g/min for 2.0 Hz and increased global cerebral perfusion pressure of 91 mm Hg for 0 Hz, 100.5 mm Hg for 0.5 Hz, 95.5 mm Hg for 1.0 Hz, 97.0 mm Hg for 2.0 Hz, 98.0 mm Hg for 2.5 Hz, 95.0 mm Hg for 2.5 Hz, and 67.8 mm Hg for 3.0 Hz were seen for higher PD frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These data give some support to consider redefining the continuum between seizures and PDs, suggesting that additional damage after acute brain injury may be reflected by frequency changes in electrocerebral recordings. Similar to seizures, cerebral blood flow increases in patients with PDs to compensate for the increased metabolic demand but higher-frequency PDs (>2 per second) may be inadequately compensated without an additional rise in CBF and associated with brain tissue hypoxia, or higher-frequency PDs may reflect inadequacies in brain compensatory mechanisms.

摘要

重要性

在急性脑损伤后,脑电图(EEG)记录中普遍存在不符合癫痫发作标准的周期性放电(PDs),也称为发作间连续体。然而,其与脑内稳态的关系以及是否需要临床干预仍然未知。

目的

确定是否可以识别出与电发作相似的不同 PD 模式,这些模式会导致脑组织缺氧,从而衡量持续的脑损伤。

设计、设置和参与者:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 90 名患有高分级自发性蛛网膜下腔出血且处于昏迷状态的患者,这些患者接受了连续的表面(头皮)脑电图(sEEG)记录和多模态监测,包括皮层内(深度)脑电图(dEEG)、脑间质氧分压(Pbto2)和局部脑血流(CBF)的侵入性测量。患者数据于 2006 年 6 月 1 日至 2014 年 9 月 1 日在一家三级护理中心收集。回顾性分析于 2014 年 9 月 1 日至 2016 年 5 月 1 日进行,假设脑氧合的影响主要取决于放电频率。

主要结果和措施

根据 PD 频率和放电的空间分布,对脑电图记录进行了视觉分类。通过应用自举法进行变点分析,对多模态监测数据和变化点分析之间的相关性进行了研究,以描述电生理变化。

结果

在纳入研究的 90 例患者中(男 26 例,女 64 例;平均[SD]年龄,55[15]岁),32 例(36%)在 sEEG 和 dEEG 记录上有 PDs,21 例(23%)仅在 dEEG 记录上有 PDs。PDs 的频率范围为 0.5 至 2.5 Hz。无 PDs 时中位数 Pbto2 为 23 mmHg,而 2.0 Hz 时为 16 mmHg,2.5 Hz 时为 14 mmHg(基于自举法,0 与 2.5 Hz 之间的差异有统计学意义)。变点分析证实了高频 PD 发作(≥2.0 Hz)和 Pbto2 降低(发作后 5-10 分钟,归一化 Pbto2 中位数降低 25%)之间存在时间关联。0 Hz 时局部脑血流增加 21.0 mL/100 g/min,1.0 Hz 时增加 25.9 mL/100 g/min,1.5 Hz 时增加 27.5 mL/100 g/min,2.0 Hz 时增加 34.7 mL/100 g/min,0 Hz 时全局脑灌注压增加 91.0 mm Hg,0.5 Hz 时增加 100.5 mm Hg,1.0 Hz 时增加 95.5 mm Hg,2.0 Hz 时增加 97.0 mm Hg,2.5 Hz 时增加 98.0 mm Hg,2.5 Hz 时增加 95.0 mm Hg,3.0 Hz 时增加 67.8 mm Hg,这些都是由于 PD 频率升高所致。

结论和相关性

这些数据为重新定义发作和 PDs 之间的连续体提供了一些支持,表明急性脑损伤后可能会反映在电脑记录中的频率变化上出现额外的损伤。与癫痫发作相似,PD 患者的脑血流增加以补偿增加的代谢需求,但如果没有额外的 CBF 增加和相关的脑组织缺氧,高频 PDs(>2 次/秒)可能无法得到充分补偿,或者高频 PDs 可能反映了脑补偿机制的不足。

相似文献

1
Electroencephalographic Periodic Discharges and Frequency-Dependent Brain Tissue Hypoxia in Acute Brain Injury.急性脑损伤中的脑电图周期性放电和频率相关的脑组织缺氧。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):301-309. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5325.
2
The EEG Ictal-Interictal Continuum-A Metabolic Roar But a Whimper of a Functional Outcome.脑电图发作期-发作间期连续体——代谢活跃却功能结果不佳。
Epilepsy Curr. 2019 Jul-Aug;19(4):234-236. doi: 10.1177/1535759719855968. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Combined depth and scalp electroencephalographic monitoring in acute brain injury: Yield and prognostic value.急性脑损伤中联合深度和头皮脑电图监测:检出率及预后价值
Eur J Neurol. 2024 Apr;31(4):e16208. doi: 10.1111/ene.16208. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
4
Association of Periodic and Rhythmic Electroencephalographic Patterns With Seizures in Critically Ill Patients.周期性和节律性脑电图模式与危重症患者癫痫发作的关联。
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):181-188. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.4990.
5
Intracranial electroencephalographic seizure-onset patterns: effect of underlying pathology.颅内脑电图发作起始模式:潜在病理的影响。
Brain. 2014 Jan;137(Pt 1):183-96. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt299. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
6
Changes in linear dynamics of cerebrovascular system after severe traumatic brain injury.重度创伤性脑损伤后脑血管系统线性动力学的变化
Stroke. 2003 May;34(5):1197-202. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000068409.81859.C5. Epub 2003 Apr 3.
7
Cortical Spreading Depolarizations and Clinically Measured Scalp EEG Activity After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Traumatic Brain Injury.皮质扩散性去极化与颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血和外伤性脑损伤后的临床测量头皮脑电图活动。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Jun;37(Suppl 1):49-59. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01418-7. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
8
Clinical and Electrographic Correlates of Bilateral Independent Periodic Discharges.双侧独立周期性放电的临床与脑电图相关性
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2018 May;35(3):234-241. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000472.
9
Associated Factors and Prognostic Implications of Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges.刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或痫性放电的相关因素及其预后意义。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 May 1;73(5):585-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0006.
10
The Ictal-Interictal Continuum: To Treat or Not to Treat (and How)?发作-发作间期连续谱:治疗还是不治疗(以及如何治疗)?
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):3-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0477-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Seminars in epileptology: How to diagnose status epilepticus in adults and children.癫痫学研讨会:如何诊断成人和儿童癫痫持续状态。
Epileptic Disord. 2025 Aug;27(4):530-549. doi: 10.1002/epd2.70033. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Raised Intracranial Pressure in Seizures Induced by Electroconvulsive Therapy.电惊厥治疗诱发癫痫发作时的颅内压升高
Eur J Neurol. 2025 Apr;32(4):e70149. doi: 10.1111/ene.70149.
3
Periodic discharges in portable EEG of critically ill patients with altered mentation; an alerting and alarming phenomena with helpful clues.意识改变的重症患者便携式脑电图中的周期性放电;一种具有有用线索的警示和报警现象。
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2789-2800. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08095-w. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
4
Commentary on stimulus-induced arousal with transient electroencephalographic improvement distinguishes nonictal from ictal generalized periodic discharges.基于短暂脑电图改善的刺激诱发觉醒的评论可区分非癫痫性与癫痫性全身性周期性放电。
Epilepsia. 2024 Dec;65(12):3484-3487. doi: 10.1111/epi.18159. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
5
Automated quantification of periodic discharges in human electroencephalogram.人类脑电图中周期性放电的自动量化。
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2024 Sep 20;10(6). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ad6c53.
6
Utility and rationale for continuous EEG monitoring: a primer for the general intensivist.持续脑电图监测的作用及基本原理:普通重症监护医生入门指南
Crit Care. 2024 Jul 16;28(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04986-0.
7
Comparison of Continuous Intracortical and Scalp Electroencephalography in Comatose Patients with Acute Brain Injury.急性脑损伤昏迷患者连续皮层脑电图与头皮脑电图的比较
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Dec;41(3):903-915. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02016-z. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
8
The Role of Routine Electroencephalography in the Diagnosis of Seizures in Medical Intensive Care Units.常规脑电图在医学重症监护病房癫痫诊断中的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 27;14(11):1111. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111111.
9
Diffuse microglial responses and persistent EEG changes correlate with poor neurological outcome in a model of subarachnoid hemorrhage.在蛛网膜下腔出血模型中,弥漫性小胶质细胞反应和持续性脑电图变化与不良神经学预后相关。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 13;14(1):13618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64631-2.
10
How many patients do you need? Investigating trial designs for anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury patients.需要多少患者?调查急性脑损伤患者抗癫痫治疗的试验设计。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Jul;11(7):1681-1690. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52059. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive seizure monitoring in the critically-Ill brain injury patient: Current practices and a review of the literature.重症脑损伤患者的侵入性癫痫监测:当前实践与文献综述
Seizure. 2016 Oct;41:201-5. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2016.05.017. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
2
Metabolic Correlates of the Ictal-Interictal Continuum: FDG-PET During Continuous EEG.发作期-发作间期连续过程的代谢关联:持续脑电图监测期间的氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描
Neurocrit Care. 2016 Jun;24(3):324-31. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0245-y.
3
Prognostication of long-term outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage: The FRESH score.蛛网膜下腔出血后长期预后的预测:FRESH 评分。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Jul;80(1):46-58. doi: 10.1002/ana.24675. Epub 2016 May 25.
4
Causal Structure of Brain Physiology after Brain Injury from Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血所致脑损伤后脑生理学的因果结构
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 28;11(4):e0149878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149878. eCollection 2016.
5
Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in adults - insights into the invisible.成人非惊厥性癫痫持续状态——看不见的洞察力。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 May;12(5):281-93. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.45. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
6
Associated Factors and Prognostic Implications of Stimulus-Induced Rhythmic, Periodic, or Ictal Discharges.刺激诱导的节律性、周期性或痫性放电的相关因素及其预后意义。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 May 1;73(5):585-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.0006.
7
Understanding and Managing the Ictal-Interictal Continuum in Neurocritical Care.理解与管理神经重症监护中的发作期-发作间期连续体
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2016 Feb;18(2):8. doi: 10.1007/s11940-015-0391-0.
8
Metabolic crisis occurs with seizures and periodic discharges after brain trauma.代谢危机发生于脑外伤后伴发的癫痫发作和周期性放电。
Ann Neurol. 2016 Apr;79(4):579-90. doi: 10.1002/ana.24606. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
9
Seizure burden in subarachnoid hemorrhage associated with functional and cognitive outcome.蛛网膜下腔出血中的癫痫发作负担与功能及认知结局的关系
Neurology. 2016 Jan 19;86(3):253-60. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002281. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
10
Levetiracetam Treatment in Traumatic Brain Injury: Operation Brain Trauma Therapy.左乙拉西坦治疗创伤性脑损伤:脑外伤治疗行动
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Mar 15;33(6):581-94. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4131.