Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0200151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200151. eCollection 2018.
The impairment to discriminate the motion direction of a large high contrast stimulus or to detect a stimulus surrounded by another one is called visual suppression and is the result of the normal function of our visual inhibitory mechanisms. Recently, Melnick et al. (2013), using a motion discrimination task, showed that intelligence strongly correlates with visual suppression (r = 0.71). Cook et al. (2016) also showed a strong link between contrast surround suppression and IQ (r = 0.87), this time using a contrast matching task. Our aim is to test this link using two different visual suppression tasks: a motion discrimination task and a contrast detection task. Fifty volunteers took part in the experiments. Using Bayesian staircases, we measured duration thresholds in the motion experiment and contrast thresholds in the spatial experiment. Although we found a much weaker effect, our results from the motion experiment still replicate previous results supporting the link between motion surround suppression and IQ (r = 0.43). However, our results from the spatial experiment do not support the link between contrast surround suppression and IQ (r = -0.09). Methodological differences between this study and previous studies which could explain these discrepancies are discussed.
对大高对比度刺激的运动方向的辨别能力或对被另一个刺激包围的刺激的检测能力的损害称为视觉抑制,这是我们视觉抑制机制正常功能的结果。最近,Melnick 等人(2013 年)使用运动辨别任务表明,智力与视觉抑制强烈相关(r=0.71)。Cook 等人(2016 年)也使用对比匹配任务表明,对比环绕抑制与智商之间存在很强的联系(r=0.87)。我们的目的是使用两种不同的视觉抑制任务来检验这种联系:运动辨别任务和对比度检测任务。五十名志愿者参加了实验。我们使用贝叶斯阶梯法测量了运动实验中的持续时间阈值和空间实验中的对比度阈值。尽管我们发现的效果要弱得多,但我们的运动实验结果仍然复制了先前支持运动环绕抑制与智商之间联系的结果(r=0.43)。然而,我们的空间实验结果并不支持对比度环绕抑制与智商之间的联系(r=-0.09)。讨论了本研究与之前研究之间的方法学差异,这些差异可能解释了这些差异。