• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

(NEOSORB® plus)与涂层聚乙醇酸910缝线(NEOSORB®)在术中操作及伤口愈合方面的比较:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。

Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB® plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Tae Bum Sik, Park Ju Hyun, Kim Jung Kwon, Ku Ja Hyeon, Kwak Cheol, Kim Hyeon Hoe, Jeong Chang Wook

机构信息

Department of Urology, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, South Korea.

Department of Urology, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0377-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-018-0377-4
PMID:29980202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6035400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coated polyglactin 910 suture with chlorhexidine (NEOSORB® Plus) has recently been developed to imbue the parent suture with antibacterial activity against organisms that commonly cause surgical site infections (SSI). This prospective, single-blinded, randomized trial, was performed to compare the intraoperative handling and wound healing characteristics of NEOSORB® Plus with those of the traditional polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®) in urologic surgery patients.

METHODS

Patients (aged 19 to 80 years, n = 100) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio for treatment with either NEOSORB® Plus or NEOSORB®, and stratified into an open surgery or a minimally invasive surgery group. The primary endpoint was the assessment of overall intraoperative handling of the sutures. Secondary endpoints included specific intraoperative handling measures and wound healing characteristics. Wound healing was assessed at one and 11 days after surgery. Cumulative skin infection, seroma, and suture sinus events within 30 days after surgery were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 96 patients were included, with 47 patients in the NEOSORB® Plus group and 49 patients in the NEOSORB® group. Scores for intraoperative handling were favorable and were not significantly different between the two suture groups. Wound healing characteristics were also comparable. The incidence of adverse events was 13.6%, although none were deemed attributable to the suture, and no difference was observed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NEOSORB® Plus is not inferior to traditional sutures in terms of intraoperative handling and wound healing, potentially making NEOSORB® Plus a beneficial alternative for patients at increased risk of SSI.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02431039 . Trial registration date 14 August 2015.

摘要

背景

含氯己定的聚乙醇酸910涂层缝线(NEOSORB® Plus)最近被研发出来,以使母体缝线具备针对通常导致手术部位感染(SSI)的微生物的抗菌活性。本前瞻性、单盲、随机试验旨在比较NEOSORB® Plus与传统聚乙醇酸910缝线(NEOSORB®)在泌尿外科手术患者中的术中操作和伤口愈合特征。

方法

患者(年龄19至80岁,n = 100)按1:1比例随机分为接受NEOSORB® Plus或NEOSORB®治疗,并分层为开放手术组或微创手术组。主要终点是评估缝线的总体术中操作。次要终点包括特定的术中操作措施和伤口愈合特征。在术后1天和11天评估伤口愈合情况。还评估了术后30天内的累积皮肤感染、血清肿和缝线窦事件。

结果

共纳入96例患者,NEOSORB® Plus组47例,NEOSORB®组49例。术中操作评分良好,两组缝线之间无显著差异。伤口愈合特征也具有可比性。不良事件发生率为13.6%,尽管没有不良事件被认为归因于缝线,两组之间也未观察到差异。

结论

NEOSORB® Plus在术中操作和伤口愈合方面不劣于传统缝线,这可能使NEOSORB® Plus成为SSI风险增加患者的有益替代选择。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02431039。试验注册日期2015年8月14日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/bf80223b1f67/12893_2018_377_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/14b7c1aa35d4/12893_2018_377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/41a34d7273a6/12893_2018_377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/7f6b33cc6c27/12893_2018_377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/bf80223b1f67/12893_2018_377_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/14b7c1aa35d4/12893_2018_377_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/41a34d7273a6/12893_2018_377_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/7f6b33cc6c27/12893_2018_377_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa5/6035400/bf80223b1f67/12893_2018_377_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB® plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial.(NEOSORB® plus)与涂层聚乙醇酸910缝线(NEOSORB®)在术中操作及伤口愈合方面的比较:一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 6;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0377-4.
2
Intraoperative handling and wound healing: controlled clinical trial comparing coated VICRYL plus antibacterial suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) with coated VICRYL suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture).术中操作与伤口愈合:比较含抗菌涂层的薇乔加强缝线(含三氯生的聚乙醇酸910涂层缝线)与普通薇乔缝线(聚乙醇酸910涂层缝线)的对照临床试验
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005 Fall;6(3):313-21. doi: 10.1089/sur.2005.6.313.
3
Efficacy of antimicrobial coating suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl plus) compared with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis, double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report.与聚乙醇酸910(薇乔)相比,含二十三烷的抗菌涂层缝线聚乙醇酸910(薇乔加强型)在降低阑尾炎手术部位感染方面的疗效:双盲随机对照试验,初步安全性报告
J Med Assoc Thai. 2009 Jun;92(6):770-5.
4
Cosmetic outcome and surgical site infection rates of antibacterial absorbable (Polyglactin 910) suture compared to Chinese silk suture in breast cancer surgery: a randomized pilot research.抗菌可吸收缝线(聚乳酸 910)与医用丝线在乳腺癌手术中美容效果及手术部位感染率的比较:一项随机对照初步研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Mar;124(5):719-24.
5
Triclosan-coated sutures reduce wound infections after spinal surgery: a retrospective, nonrandomized, clinical study.含三氯生缝线可减少脊柱手术后的伤口感染:一项回顾性、非随机临床研究。
Spine J. 2015 May 1;15(5):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.046. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
6
Antibacterial [corrected] coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection.腹部闭合缝线的抗菌[校正后]涂层与伤口感染
Surgery. 2009 Mar;145(3):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.11.007. Epub 2009 Jan 25.
7
Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Loop Suture vs Polydioxanone Loop Suture in Emergent Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.腹部紧急外科手术后,采用三氯生涂层倒刺缝线与三氯生涂层聚二氧环己酮环缝线与聚二氧环己酮缝线行切口缝合的手术部位感染发生率:一项随机临床试验。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
8
Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast and Vicryl rapide polyglactin 910 fast absorbing sutures on maternal morbidity experienced by women following episiotomy repair: a single-blind, randomized study.经会阴切开修补术后产妇发病率方面,Trusynth fast 与 Vicryl rapide 聚乳酸 910 快吸收缝线的临床等效性:一项单盲、随机研究。
F1000Res. 2023 Jun 23;11:1179. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.126555.2. eCollection 2022.
9
Surgical site infections after abdominal closure in colorectal surgery using triclosan-coated absorbable suture (PDS Plus) vs. uncoated sutures (PDS II): a randomized multicenter study.腹部闭合术后使用三氯生涂层可吸收缝线(PDS Plus)与未涂层缝线(PDS II)治疗结直肠手术部位感染的随机多中心研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2011 Dec;12(6):483-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2011.001. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
10
Impact of using triclosan-antibacterial sutures on incidence of surgical site infection.三氯生抗菌缝线对手术部位感染发生率的影响。
Am J Surg. 2011 Aug;202(2):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.06.011. Epub 2011 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Chlorhexidine - coated vs non-coated Suture to prevent surgical site infections following laparoscopic abdominal surgery (a prospective, randomized, controlled trial; NOVOTILAC).氯己定涂层缝线与非涂层缝线预防腹腔镜腹部手术后手术部位感染的比较(一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验;NOVOTILAC)
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Jun 13;410(1):191. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03757-x.
2
Comparing the Clinical and Microbiological Effects of Antibacterial-Coated Vicryl Suture and Non-Coated Vicryl Suture after Minor Oral Surgical Procedures.比较小型口腔外科手术后抗菌涂层薇乔缝线与未涂层薇乔缝线的临床和微生物学效果。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Apr;24(2):557-568. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02249-7. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of triclosan-coated sutures for reducing risk of surgical site infection in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.三氯生涂层缝线降低成人手术部位感染风险的疗效:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2016 Mar;201(1):105-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
2
Influence of Shorter Duration of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery.缩短预防性抗生素使用时间对结直肠癌手术后手术部位感染发生率的影响。
Ann Coloproctol. 2015 Dec;31(6):235-42. doi: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.235. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
3
The Results of a Propensity Score Matching Analysis of the Efficacy of Abdominal Fascia and Skin Closure Using PDS® Plus Antibacterial (Polydioxanone) Sutures on the Incidence of Superficial Incisional Surgical Site Infections after Gastroenterologic Surgery.
Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.
术中手术部位感染控制与预防:WSES 腹腔感染指南的立场文件和未来增编。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb 10;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-0288-4.
使用PDS® Plus抗菌(聚二氧六环酮)缝线进行腹部筋膜和皮肤缝合对胃肠外科手术后手术切口浅表感染发生率影响的倾向评分匹配分析结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Feb;17(1):94-9. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.006. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Novel high efficient coatings for anti-microbial surgical sutures using chlorhexidine in fatty acid slow-release carrier systems.在脂肪酸缓释载体系统中使用洗必泰的新型高效抗菌手术缝线涂层
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 1;9(7):e101426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101426. eCollection 2014.
5
Meta-analysis of prevention of surgical site infections following incision closure with triclosan-coated sutures: robustness to new evidence.三氯生涂层缝线闭合切口后预防手术部位感染的Meta分析:对新证据的稳健性
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Jun;15(3):165-81. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.177. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
6
Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial.三氯生涂层 PDS Plus 缝线与未涂层 PDS II 缝线预防腹壁关闭后手术部位感染的效果:随机对照 PROUD 试验。
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):142-52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60238-5. Epub 2014 Apr 7.
7
An in vitro study assessing the effect of mesh morphology and suture fixation on bacterial adherence.一项体外研究评估了网孔形态和缝线固定对细菌黏附的影响。
Hernia. 2013 Dec;17(6):779-89. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1124-5. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection.系统评价和荟萃分析三氯生涂层缝线预防手术部位感染的效果。
Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):465-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9062. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Triclosan-coated sutures reduce the incidence of wound infections and the costs after colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.三氯生涂层缝线可降低结直肠手术后伤口感染的发生率和成本:一项随机对照试验。
Surgery. 2013 Apr;153(4):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.11.018. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
10
Chlorhexidine-alcohol compared with povidone-iodine for surgical-site antisepsis in cesarean deliveries.氯己定-酒精与聚维酮碘用于剖宫产术部位的消毒比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1037-44. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826f3bd9.