Suppr超能文献

术后腹腔感染时菌血症的临床特征和预后。

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of bacteraemia during postoperative intra-abdominal infections.

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Bichat-Claude Bernard, APHP, Paris, France.

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2018 Jul 7;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2099-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections of abdominal origin are usually associated with poor prognosis. We assessed the clinical and microbiological characteristics of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative intra-abdominal infection (PIAI) and analysed the influence of bacteraemia on their outcome.

METHODS

All consecutive PIAI patients admitted to the ICU between 1999 and 2014 were prospectively analysed. Bacteraemic patients (at least one positive blood culture in the 24 h preceding/following surgery) were compared with non-bacteraemic patients. Demographic characteristics, underlying disease, severity scores at the time of reoperation, microbiological results, therapeutic management, outcome, and survival were recorded. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range (IQR)) or proportions.

RESULTS

Overall, 343 patients (54% male, 62 (49-73) years old) with PIAI were analysed, including 64 (19%) bacteraemic patients. Immunosuppression and cancer were more frequent in bacteraemic patients (p < 0.001 in both cases). No difference between groups was observed for the characteristics of initial surgery. Time to reoperation, site, and cause of PIAI were similar in both groups. At the time of reoperation, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was higher in bacteraemic patients (8 (6-10) versus 7 (4-10); p < 0.05). A predominance of Gram-positive (34%) and Gram-negative (47%) bacteria were recovered from blood cultures (polymicrobial bacteraemia in 9 (14%) patients and bacteraemia involving multidrug-resistant organisms in 14 (22%) patients). In multivariate analysis, risk factors for bacteraemia were immunosuppression or cancer, high SOFA score, and E. coli in peritoneal samples. Bacteraemia did not impact the management (with similar results for the adequacy of antibiotic therapy, anti-infective agents used, de-escalation or duration of therapy in both groups). Neither hospital mortality nor morbidity criteria differed between groups. Risk factors for mortality in multivariate analysis were urgent initial surgery, high Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score and documented antifungal therapy, but not perioperative bacteraemia.

CONCLUSIONS

In this ICU population, bacteraemia did not change the overall management of patients with PIAI. Our data suggest that bacteraemic patients do not require a specific management.

摘要

背景

腹部来源的血流感染通常与预后不良有关。我们评估了因术后腹腔感染(PIAI)入住重症监护病房(ICU)的危重症患者的临床和微生物学特征,并分析了菌血症对其预后的影响。

方法

前瞻性分析 1999 年至 2014 年间入住 ICU 的所有连续 PIAI 患者。将菌血症患者(手术前/后 24 小时内至少有一次阳性血培养)与非菌血症患者进行比较。记录人口统计学特征、基础疾病、再次手术时的严重程度评分、微生物学结果、治疗管理、结局和生存率。结果表示为中位数(四分位距(IQR))或比例。

结果

共分析了 343 例 PIAI 患者(54%为男性,62(49-73)岁),其中 64 例(19%)为菌血症患者。免疫抑制和癌症在菌血症患者中更为常见(均为 p<0.001)。两组患者的初始手术特征无差异。两组患者的再手术时间、部位和 PIAI 原因相似。再次手术时,菌血症患者的序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分更高(8(6-10)比 7(4-10);p<0.05)。血培养中分离出以革兰氏阳性(34%)和革兰氏阴性(47%)细菌为主(9(14%)例患者为混合菌血症,14(22%)例患者为多药耐药菌血症)。多变量分析中,菌血症的危险因素为免疫抑制或癌症、高 SOFA 评分和腹腔样本中的大肠杆菌。菌血症并未影响治疗管理(两组抗生素治疗的充分性、使用的抗感染药物、治疗降级或持续时间相似)。两组的住院死亡率和发病率标准均无差异。多变量分析中,死亡的危险因素是紧急初始手术、高简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)II 评分和有记录的抗真菌治疗,但不是围手术期菌血症。

结论

在该 ICU 人群中,菌血症并未改变 PIAI 患者的总体治疗方法。我们的数据表明,菌血症患者不需要特定的治疗方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections.腹腔内感染管理指南。
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2015 Apr;34(2):117-30. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验