Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Feb;157(2):540-549. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.05.086. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
The goal of this study is to evaluate how sinus flow patterns after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in realistic representative patient roots vary. Sinus flow can affect transcatheter aortic valve operation and likely leaflet thrombosis occurrence due to stasis and poor washout. How the interaction between transcatheter aortic valve and representative patient aortic roots affects sinus hemodynamics is important to establish for future individualization of transcatheter aortic valve replacement therapy.
Two representative patient aortic roots were selected, segmented and 3-dimensional printed followed by deployment of Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic Inc, Irvine, Calif) and Edwards SAPIEN (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine Calif) transcatheter aortic valves. Sinus hemodynamics were assessed in vitro using high spatio-temporal resolution particle-image-velocimetry. Detailed sinus vortex tracking, shear stress probability density functions, and sinus washout were evaluated and assessed as a function of valve type and representative patient morphology as independent case studies.
Peak velocity in the sinus with SAPIEN valve was approximately 3 times higher than with CoreValve for both models (0.30 ± 0.02 m/s and 0.34 ± 0.041 m/s vs 0.13 ± 0.01 m/s and 0.10 ± 0.02 m/s) (P < .01). Between representative patient models, vorticity magnitudes were significantly different (75 ± 1.1 s, 77 ± 3.2 s, 109 ± 2.3 s, and 250 ± 4.1 s) (P < .01) regardless of valve type. Sinus blood washout characteristic as a function of cardiac cycles was strongly both patient related and valve specific. Fluid dynamics favored shear stresses and washout characteristics due to a smaller sinus and sinotubular junction, further amplified by the SAPIEN valve.
Sinus flow dynamics are highly sensitive to aortic root characteristics and transcatheter aortic valve aortic root interaction. Differences in sinus-flow washout and stasis regions between representative patient models may be reflected in different risks of leaflet thrombosis or valve degeneration.
本研究旨在评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术后真实代表性患者根部窦流模式的变化。窦流会影响经导管主动脉瓣的功能,并可能因停滞和冲洗不良导致瓣叶血栓形成。了解经导管主动脉瓣与代表性患者主动脉根部之间的相互作用如何影响窦血流动力学对于未来经导管主动脉瓣置换治疗的个体化具有重要意义。
选择两个代表性的患者主动脉根部,进行分割和 3 维打印,然后植入美敦力 CoreValve(美敦力公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)和爱德华兹 SAPIEN(爱德华兹生命科学公司,加利福尼亚州欧文)经导管主动脉瓣。使用高时空分辨率粒子图像测速法在体外评估窦血流动力学。详细的窦涡流跟踪、剪切应力概率密度函数和窦冲洗功能作为独立的病例研究,作为函数进行评估,并作为瓣膜类型和代表性患者形态的函数进行评估。
对于两种模型,SAPIEN 瓣膜的窦内峰值速度均比 CoreValve 高约 3 倍(0.30±0.02m/s 和 0.34±0.041m/s 比 0.13±0.01m/s 和 0.10±0.02m/s)(P<0.01)。在代表性患者模型之间,涡量大小差异显著(75±1.1s、77±3.2s、109±2.3s 和 250±4.1s)(P<0.01),而与瓣膜类型无关。窦内血液冲洗特征作为心脏周期的函数,与患者和瓣膜特异性密切相关。由于窦和窦管交界处较小,流体动力学有利于剪切应力和冲洗特性,而 SAPIEN 瓣膜进一步放大了这一特性。
窦血流动力学对主动脉根部特征和经导管主动脉瓣主动脉根部相互作用高度敏感。代表性患者模型之间窦流冲洗和停滞区域的差异可能反映在瓣叶血栓形成或瓣膜退化的不同风险中。