Suppr超能文献

保乳治疗早期乳腺癌患者美容效果不佳的预测因素:Young boost 试验结果。

Predictors for poor cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: Results of the Young boost trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2018 Sep;128(3):434-441. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.020. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In the Young Boost trial (YBT), breast cancer patients ≤50 years of age, treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT) were randomized between a 26 Gy boost dose and a 16 Gy boost dose, with local recurrence as primary and cosmetic outcome (CO) as secondary endpoint. Data of the YBT was used to investigate which factors are related with worse cosmetic outcome after BCT.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2011, 2421 cT1-2N0-2a breast cancer patients were randomized. CO was scored subjectively by the patient and physician, and objectively using BCCT.core: at baseline, one and four years after treatment. Associations between potential risk factors for worse cosmetic outcome, based on the objective BCCT.core, were investigated using a proportional odds model.

RESULTS

At four years, CO was significantly better in the standard boost group for all three scoring methods (satisfied CO ±65% vs 55%). A photon boost, high boost dose, poor cosmesis before radiation therapy, large boost volume and adjuvant chemotherapy significantly deteriorated CO.

CONCLUSION

Important risk factors for worse CO were the use of a photon boost instead of an electron boost, a high boost dose, cosmesis at baseline, adjuvant chemotherapy and boost volume. These results can be used to define strategies aimed at improving CO.

摘要

目的

在年轻的 Boost 试验(YBT)中,接受保乳治疗(BCT)的≤50 岁乳腺癌患者被随机分为 26Gy 推量剂量组和 16Gy 推量剂量组,以局部复发作为主要终点,美容结果(CO)作为次要终点。使用 YBT 的数据来研究哪些因素与 BCT 后较差的美容结果相关。

方法

2004 年至 2011 年,共 2421 例 cT1-2N0-2a 乳腺癌患者被随机分组。CO 由患者和医生主观评分,并使用 BCCT.core:在基线、治疗后 1 年和 4 年进行客观评分。使用比例优势模型,根据客观的 BCCT.core,研究与较差的美容结果相关的潜在危险因素之间的关联。

结果

在四年时,所有三种评分方法的标准推量组的 CO 明显更好(满意 CO ±65% vs 55%)。光子推量、高推量剂量、放疗前美容效果差、大推量体积和辅助化疗显著恶化 CO。

结论

CO 较差的重要危险因素是使用光子推量而不是电子推量、高推量剂量、基线时的美容效果、辅助化疗和推量体积。这些结果可用于制定旨在改善 CO 的策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验