Discipline of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Discipline of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Apr 5;28(4):242. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05620-7.
To systematically review the literature for mid-sagittal plane establishment approaches to identify the most effective method for constructing the mid-sagittal plane for the evaluation of facial asymmetry.
Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched for the studies that computed the mid-sagittal reference plane three-dimensionally, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The methodological quality and the level of evidence for the included studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively.
The preliminary search yielded 6746 records, of which 42 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. All the included articles reported the construction of the mid-sagittal reference plane (MSP) using varied methods. The risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies were judged to be 'low'. The level of evidence was determined to be 'low' for the effectiveness of the technique and 'moderate' for the ease of clinical applicability.
Despite methodological heterogeneity, this review substantiates the comparable efficacy of cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction methods. A fully automated morphometric MSP holds promise as a viable option for routine clinical use. Nevertheless, future prospective studies with an emphasis on the impact, accuracy, and clinical applicability of MSP construction techniques in cases of facial asymmetry are required.
The present review will assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable method for MSP construction, leading to improved treatment planning and ultimately more favorable treatment outcomes.
系统综述文献中建立正中矢状面的方法,以确定评估面部不对称时构建正中矢状面最有效的方法。
通过主题词和关键词组合,在 6 个电子数据库(PubMed、Medline(通过 Ovid)、EMBASE(通过 Ovid)、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 Scopus)和灰色文献中搜索了三维计算中矢状参考面的研究。使用 QUADAS-2 和 GRADE 分别分析纳入研究的方法学质量和证据水平。
初步搜索得到 6746 条记录,其中 42 篇符合预设纳入标准的文章被纳入最终分析。所有纳入的文章均报告了使用不同方法构建正中矢状参考面(MSP)。纳入研究的偏倚风险和适用性问题被判断为“低”。该技术的有效性被确定为“低”,临床适用性被确定为“中”。
尽管方法学存在异质性,但本综述证实了头影测量和形态测量 MSP 构建方法的等效疗效。完全自动化的形态测量 MSP 有望成为常规临床应用的可行选择。然而,未来需要进行前瞻性研究,重点关注 MSP 构建技术对面部不对称的影响、准确性和临床适用性。
本综述将帮助临床医生选择最适合的 MSP 构建方法,从而改善治疗计划,最终获得更有利的治疗结果。