Department of Cardiology III - Adult Congenital and Valvular Heart Diesease, University Hospital Münster, Germany.
Department of Cardiology I - Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease, Heart Failure, University Hospital Münster, Germany.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.107. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
In patients with repaired Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF), implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are considered reasonable in selected adults with multiple risk factors for sudden cardiac death.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of all 174 patients with repaired ToF who are followed at the University Hospital of Muenster. We analyzed data according to the risk score previously proposed by Khairy and coworkers and patient outcome. We analyzed data separately for patients without previous sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) (risk stratification group, n = 157) and patients with VT/secondary prevention ICD (n = 17).
In the risk stratification group, a mean of 4 ± 1 risk score parameters were available. All six risk parameters were known in 10%, five in 14%. Risk score increased with availability of parameters. 15 patients with secondary prevention ICD had a mean risk score of 6.3 ± 2.2 (range 2-10). 11 patients of the risk stratification group with primary prevention ICD had a mean risk score 5.8 ± 2.4 (range 3-8). During follow-up of up to 14 years, five patients died (3%): at age 58, two at 69 and two at 76 years.
In the majority of patients risk score variables were incomplete, severely limiting its applicability because the true score cannot be calculated. Risk scores were not different between patients with secondary prevention ICD and patients with ICD for primary prevention based on current guidelines. Standardization of follow-up and prospective evaluation of these standards in large prospective patient cohorts is desirable to improve risk stratification in patients with ToF.
在修复后的法洛四联症(ToF)患者中,对于存在多种心源性猝死高危因素的患者,植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)被认为是合理的。
我们对在明斯特大学医院接受治疗的 174 例修复后的 ToF 患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们根据 Khairy 等人提出的风险评分和患者预后对数据进行了分析。我们分别对无先前持续性室性心动过速(VT)的患者(风险分层组,n=157)和有 VT/二级预防 ICD 的患者(n=17)进行了数据分析。
在风险分层组中,平均有 4±1 个风险评分参数。已知的风险参数有 6 个,占 10%,5 个占 14%。风险评分随参数的可用性而增加。15 例接受二级预防 ICD 的患者的平均风险评分为 6.3±2.2(范围 2-10)。11 例接受一级预防 ICD 的风险分层组患者的平均风险评分为 5.8±2.4(范围 3-8)。在最长 14 年的随访中,有 5 例患者死亡(3%):年龄分别为 58 岁、69 岁和 76 岁。
在大多数患者中,风险评分变量不完整,严重限制了其适用性,因为无法计算真实评分。根据目前的指南,二级预防 ICD 患者与一级预防 ICD 患者的风险评分无差异。需要对这些标准进行标准化的随访和前瞻性评估,以改善 ToF 患者的风险分层。