Mold Freda, Raleigh Mary, Alharbi Nouf Sahal, de Lusignan Simon
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 6;20(7):e235. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7858.
Online access to computerized medical records has the potential to improve convenience, satisfaction, and care for patients, and to facilitate more efficient organization and delivery of care.
The objective of this review is to explore the use and impact of having online access to computerized medical records and services for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care.
Multiple international databases including Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library were searched between 2004 and 2016. No limitations were placed on study design, though we applied detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria to each study. Thematic analysis was used to synthesize the evidence. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Toolkit was used to appraise study quality.
A search identified 917 studies, of which 28 were included. Five themes were identified: (1) disparities in uptake by age, gender, ethnicity, educational attainment, and number of comorbidities, with young men in full-time employment using these services most; (2) improved health outcomes: glycemic control was improved, but blood pressure results were mixed; (3) self-management support from improved self-care and shared management occurred especially soon after diagnosis and when complications emerged. There was a generally positive effect on physician-patient relationships; (4) accessibility: patients valued more convenient access when online access to computerized medical records and services work; and (5) technical challenges, barriers to use, and system features that impacted patient and physician use. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Toolkit rated 3 studies as 100%, 19 studies as 75%, 4 studies as 50%, and 1 study scored only 25%.
Patients valued online access to computerized medical records and services, although in its current state of development it may increase disparities. Online access to computerized medical records appears to be safe and is associated with improved glycemic control, but there was a lack of rigorous evidence in terms of positive health outcomes for other complications, such as blood pressure. Patients remain concerned about how these systems work, the rules, and timeliness of using these systems.
在线访问电子病历有潜力提高患者的便利性、满意度和医疗服务质量,并促进医疗服务更高效地组织和提供。
本综述的目的是探讨在初级保健中,2型糖尿病患者在线访问电子病历及服务的使用情况和影响。
2004年至2016年期间检索了包括Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO和Cochrane图书馆在内的多个国际数据库。研究设计没有限制,但我们对每项研究都应用了详细的纳入和排除标准。采用主题分析法综合证据。使用混合方法评估工具包评估研究质量。
检索到917项研究,其中28项被纳入。确定了五个主题:(1)在年龄、性别、种族、教育程度和合并症数量方面的使用差异,全职工作的年轻男性使用这些服务的比例最高;(2)改善健康结局:血糖控制得到改善,但血压结果不一;(3)自我管理支持,通过改善自我护理和共同管理实现,尤其是在诊断后不久和出现并发症时。对医患关系总体有积极影响;(4)可及性:当在线访问电子病历及服务有效时,患者更看重更便捷的访问;(5)技术挑战、使用障碍以及影响患者和医生使用的系统功能。混合方法评估工具包将3项研究评为100%,19项研究评为75%,4项研究评为50%,1项研究仅得25%。
患者重视在线访问电子病历及服务,尽管就其目前的发展状况而言,可能会加剧差异。在线访问电子病历似乎是安全的,并且与改善血糖控制有关,但在其他并发症(如血压)的积极健康结局方面缺乏严格证据。患者仍然关心这些系统如何运作、使用规则以及使用这些系统的及时性。