• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于判定脑死亡的呼吸暂停试验的法医学并发症

Medicolegal Complications of Apnoea Testing for Determination of Brain Death.

作者信息

Lewis Ariane, Greer David

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, 530 First Avenue, HCC-5A, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street C3, Suite 338, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9863-8. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11673-018-9863-8
PMID:29980920
Abstract

Recently, there have been a number of lawsuits in the United States in which families objected to performance of apnoea testing for determination of brain death. The courts reached conflicting determinations in these cases. We discuss the medicolegal complications associated with apnoea testing that are highlighted by these cases and our position that the decision to perform apnoea testing should be made by clinicians, not families, judges, or juries.

摘要

最近,美国发生了多起诉讼案件,一些家庭反对通过进行呼吸暂停测试来判定脑死亡。在这些案件中,法院做出了相互矛盾的裁决。我们讨论了这些案件所凸显的与呼吸暂停测试相关的法医学并发症,以及我们的立场,即是否进行呼吸暂停测试的决定应由临床医生做出,而非家属、法官或陪审团。

相似文献

1
Medicolegal Complications of Apnoea Testing for Determination of Brain Death.用于判定脑死亡的呼吸暂停试验的法医学并发症
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):417-428. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9863-8. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
2
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.脑死亡判定中进行窒息试验要求同意的法律和伦理考虑。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754501.
3
Physician Power to Declare Death by Neurologic Criteria Threatened.医生依据神经学标准宣布死亡的权力受到威胁。
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Jun;26(3):446-449. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0375-x.
4
Variability of Brain Death Policies in the United States.美国脑死亡政策的变异性。
JAMA Neurol. 2016 Feb;73(2):213-8. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3943.
5
Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy.论死亡的大脑、生前预嘱与自主性。
Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1991 Jan 15;26(1):39-42, 45-8.
6
A survey of brain death certification--an impetus for standardisation and improvement.脑死亡认证调查——标准化与改进的推动力
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2007 Dec;36(12):987-94.
7
Brain death: legal obligations and the courts.脑死亡:法律义务与法院
Semin Neurol. 2015 Apr;35(2):174-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1547537. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
8
Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review.脑死亡判定中呼吸暂停试验的系统评价:范围综述。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Apr;34(2):608-620. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0.
9
Response to Open Peer Commentaries "Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination".对开放同行评论《重新思考脑死亡判定中知情同意和共同决策的伦理、法律及临床基础》的回应
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):W1-W5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1762796.
10
Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure during apnoea testing for the diagnosis of brain death - an observational study.在诊断脑死亡的呼吸暂停试验期间的颅内压和脑灌注压 - 一项观察性研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2015 Aug;22(8):1208-14. doi: 10.1111/ene.12727. Epub 2015 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of the perceptions of death in the context of organ donation and transplantation.器官捐献与移植背景下死亡认知的范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 18;22(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00734-z.
2
Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review.脑死亡判定中呼吸暂停试验的系统评价:范围综述。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Apr;34(2):608-620. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-01015-0.
3
Redefining Death: Urgent Need to Evolve toward a Homogeneous Definition of Death in India.重新定义死亡:印度迫切需要朝着统一的死亡定义发展。

本文引用的文献

1
Shouldn't Dead Be Dead?: The Search for a Uniform Definition of Death.死人就该是死的,不是吗?:探寻死亡的统一界定
J Law Med Ethics. 2017 Mar;45(1):112-128. doi: 10.1177/1073110517703105.
2
Rebuttal From Drs Lewis and Greer.刘易斯博士和格里尔博士的反驳。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):704-705. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
POINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? No.观点:对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停试验,是否应要求获得知情同意?不应要求。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Aug;23(8):368-370. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23220.
4
Embedded Journalists or Empirical Critics? The Nature of The "Gaze" in Bioethics.嵌入式记者还是实证批评家?生物伦理学中“凝视”的本质
J Bioeth Inq. 2018 Sep;15(3):305-307. doi: 10.1007/s11673-018-9879-0.
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):700-702. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
4
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.反驳观点:对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停测试,是否应该要求获得知情同意?应该。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
5
Organ Support After Death by Neurologic Criteria in Pediatric Patients.小儿患者基于神经学标准的死后器官支持
Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):e916-e924. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002452.
6
Variability in Diagnosing Brain Death at an Academic Medical Center.一所学术医疗中心脑死亡诊断的变异性
Neurosci J. 2017;2017:6017958. doi: 10.1155/2017/6017958. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
7
Physician Power to Declare Death by Neurologic Criteria Threatened.医生依据神经学标准宣布死亡的权力受到威胁。
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Jun;26(3):446-449. doi: 10.1007/s12028-017-0375-x.
8
Portrayal of Brain Death in Film and Television.电影和电视中对脑死亡的描绘。
Am J Transplant. 2017 Mar;17(3):761-769. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14016. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
9
Organ support after death by neurologic criteria: Results of a survey of US neurologists.基于神经学标准的死后器官支持:美国神经科医生的调查结果
Neurology. 2016 Aug 23;87(8):827-34. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003008. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
10
Public education and misinformation on brain death in mainstream media.主流媒体关于脑死亡的公众教育与错误信息
Clin Transplant. 2016 Sep;30(9):1082-9. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12791. Epub 2016 Jul 25.