• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.

作者信息

Truog Robert D, Tasker Robert C

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032
PMID:28625580
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.反驳观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停测试，是否应该要求获得知情同意？应该。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
2
POINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? No.观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停试验，是否应要求获得知情同意？不应要求。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):700-702. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.030. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
3
COUNTERPOINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? No.反驳观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？不应获得。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1145-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.029.
4
POINT: Whether Informed Consent Should Be Obtained for Apnea Testing in the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria? Yes.观点：在依据神经学标准判定死亡时，进行呼吸暂停测试是否应获得知情同意？是。
Chest. 2022 May;161(5):1143-1145. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.11.026.
5
Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? Yes: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡检查中的 apnea 测试是否需要代理人知情同意？答案是肯定的：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):218-220. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207343. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
The apnea test in brain death determination using oxygen diffusion method remains safe.采用氧弥散法进行脑死亡判定时的 apnea 试验仍然是安全的。 （注：这里“apnea”常见释义为“呼吸暂停” ，但不清楚在该医学语境下具体准确含义，可根据实际医学知识进一步确认准确表述 ）
Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):386-387. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006963. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
Should the Brain Death Exam With Apnea Test Require Surrogate Informed Consent? No: The UDDA Revision Series.脑死亡检查中的无呼吸试验是否需要替代者知情同意？否：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列。
Neurology. 2023 Aug 1;101(5):221-222. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207333. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
8
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.脑死亡判定中进行窒息试验要求同意的法律和伦理考虑。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(6):4-16. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1754501.
9
Increased apnea threshold in a pediatric patient with suspected brain death.疑似脑死亡的儿科患者呼吸暂停阈值升高。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1917-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00040.
10
Apnea testing during brain death assessment: a review of clinical practice and published literature.脑死亡评估期间的窒息试验：临床实践和已发表文献复习。
Respir Care. 2013 Mar;58(3):532-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01962.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the Problem of Brain Death Misdiagnosis.解决脑死亡误诊问题。
J Law Med Ethics. 2025 May 28;53(2):1-10. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.10107.
2
Apnea Testing on Conventional Mechanical Ventilation During Brain Death Evaluation.脑死亡评估期间常规机械通气的呼吸暂停试验。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):426-433. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-01990-8. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
3
Controversies in Brain Death Declaration: Legal and Ethical Implications in the ICU.脑死亡判定的争议：重症监护病房中的法律与伦理问题
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2020;22(4):12. doi: 10.1007/s11940-020-0618-6. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
New developments in guidelines for brain death/death by neurological criteria.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡指南的新进展。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2024 Mar;20(3):151-161. doi: 10.1038/s41582-024-00929-z. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
5
Apnea Test: The Family in the Room.呼吸暂停测试：家属在场
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Aug;41(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s12028-023-01906-y. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
6
Challenges to Brain Death in Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act: The UDDA Revision Series.修订《统一死亡判定法案》中脑死亡面临的挑战：《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列
Neurology. 2023 Jul 4;101(1):30-37. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207334.
7
Consent for determination of death by neurologic criteria in Canada: an analysis of legal and ethical authorities, and consensus-based working group recommendations.加拿大通过神经标准确定死亡的同意：法律和伦理权威分析，以及基于共识的工作组建议。
Can J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;70(4):570-584. doi: 10.1007/s12630-023-02430-5. Epub 2023 May 2.
8
Refusals of the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Mixed Methods Study of Physician Perspectives on Refusals Cases.拒绝按照神经标准判定死亡：一项关于医师对拒绝判定案例看法的混合方法研究。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):628-635. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003246. Epub 2023 May 1.
9
Pediatric Brain Death Testing Over Parental Objections: Not an Ethically Preferable Option.不顾父母反对进行儿科脑死亡检测：并非伦理上更可取的选择。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jan;23(1):90-93. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146792.
10
Pediatric brain death certification: a narrative review.小儿脑死亡认证：一项叙述性综述。
Transl Pediatr. 2021 Oct;10(10):2738-2748. doi: 10.21037/tp-20-350.