Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者的功能磁共振成像和重复经颅磁刺激显示出可比的语言功能皮质模式。

Language function shows comparable cortical patterns by functional MRI and repetitive nTMS in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Imaging Behav. 2019 Aug;13(4):1071-1092. doi: 10.1007/s11682-018-9921-1.

Abstract

In preoperative planning, fMRI and repetitive navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) repeatedly revealed differences in the detected language sites, which can be attributed to tumor-induced oxygenation changes impairing the accuracy of fMRI. We therefore compared the accordance of those techniques in healthy subjects using exactly the same tasks in both investigations. 19 healthy right-handed subjects performed object naming, pseudoword reading, verb generation, and action naming during fMRI at 3 T and rTMS. For rTMS language mapping, we stimulated 46 cortical spots over the left hemisphere; each site was stimulated for three times. Language positive points during rTMS for one, two, or three errors out the three stimulations per spot (1/3, 2/3, 3/3) were exported via DICOM, and compared to the positive fMRI clusters. As a result of this comparison, the best correlation was observed between 3/3 errors and fMRI for pseudoword reading and verb generation with t-values of p < 0.001, uncorrected for multiple comparisons, on average across the whole rTMS-spot map. We found a close spatial agreement between several rTMS-spots (2/3 and 3/3 errors) and fMRI clusters accentuated in the frontal lobe, followed by the parietal lobe and less in the temporal lobe. Compared to the fMRI clusters, there was a higher congruence for 2/3 and 3/3 errors than for 1/3 errors. Overall, results of language mapping in healthy subjects by fMRI and rTMS correspond well yet depending on the used language task.

摘要

在术前规划中,fMRI 和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)反复显示出不同的语言检测部位,这可能归因于肿瘤诱导的氧合变化影响了 fMRI 的准确性。因此,我们在健康受试者中使用完全相同的任务比较了这两种技术的一致性。19 名右利手健康受试者在 3T fMRI 和 rTMS 下进行物体命名、假词阅读、动词生成和动作命名。对于 rTMS 语言映射,我们刺激了左半球的 46 个皮质点;每个点刺激三次。rTMS 语言刺激的阳性点在每个点的三次刺激中出现一次、两次或三次错误(1/3、2/3、3/3),通过 DICOM 导出,并与 fMRI 的阳性簇进行比较。作为比较的结果,在假词阅读和动词生成方面,3/3 错误与 fMRI 的相关性最佳,t 值为 p < 0.001,未经多重比较校正,平均整个 rTMS 点图。我们发现,在额叶、顶叶和颞叶的语言刺激点(2/3 和 3/3 错误)和 fMRI 簇之间存在着密切的空间一致性,在额叶、顶叶和颞叶中更为明显。与 fMRI 簇相比,2/3 和 3/3 错误的一致性更高。总的来说,fMRI 和 rTMS 对健康受试者的语言映射结果具有良好的一致性,但取决于所使用的语言任务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验