Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Heart Rhythm. 2018 Nov;15(11):1601-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
Chronic anticoagulation is recommended for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with thromboembolic risk factors regardless of AF duration/frequency. Continuous rhythm assessment with pacemakers (PMs)/implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may allow anticoagulation only around AF episodes, reducing bleeding without increasing thromboembolic risk.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility/safety of intermittent DOAC use guided by continuous remote AF monitoring via dual-chamber PMs or ICDs.
Patients with nonpermanent AF, current DOAC use, CHADS score ≤3, a St. Jude Medical dual-chamber PM or ICD, and rare AF episodes were followed with biweekly and AF-alert based remote transmissions. Patients free of AF episodes lasting ≥6 minutes with a total AF burden <6 hours/day for 30 consecutive days discontinued DOAC. If AF burden surpassed these limits, DOAC was restarted and/or continued. Total days on DOAC and adverse events were assessed.
Among 48 patients (mean age 71.3 years; 65% male; 79% paroxysmal AF; 87% CHADS score 1-2), 14,826 days of monitoring were completed. Patients used DOACs for 3763 days, representing a 74.6% reduction in anticoagulation time compared to chronic administration. Adverse events included 2 gastrointestinal bleeds (both on DOAC), 1 fatal intracerebral bleed (off DOAC), and no thromboembolic/stroke events.
Among patients with rare AF episodes and low-to-moderate stroke risk, PM/ICD-guided DOAC administration is feasible and decreased anticoagulation utilization by 75%. Few adverse events occurred, although the study was not powered to assess these outcomes. PM/ICD-guided DOAC administration may prove a viable alternative to chronic anticoagulation. Future studies are warranted.
无论房颤(AF)持续时间/频率如何,有血栓栓塞危险因素的 AF 患者均推荐长期抗凝治疗。通过起搏器(PM)/植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)持续评估节律和使用直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC),仅在 AF 发作期间进行抗凝治疗,可能会减少出血而不增加血栓栓塞风险。
本研究旨在评估通过双腔 PM 或 ICD 进行连续远程 AF 监测指导间歇性 DOAC 使用的可行性/安全性。
研究纳入非永久性 AF、正在使用 DOAC、CHADS 评分≤3、St. Jude Medical 双腔 PM 或 ICD 的患者,进行每两周一次的远程传输和 AF 报警监测。如果连续 30 天无持续≥6 分钟且总 AF 负荷<6 小时/天的 AF 发作,则停止 DOAC 治疗。如果 AF 负荷超过这些限制,则重新开始或继续使用 DOAC。评估 DOAC 的总使用天数和不良事件。
48 例患者(平均年龄 71.3 岁;65%为男性;79%为阵发性 AF;87%的 CHADS 评分为 1-2)中,完成了 14826 天的监测。患者使用 DOAC 治疗了 3763 天,与长期给药相比,抗凝时间减少了 74.6%。不良事件包括 2 例胃肠道出血(均在使用 DOAC 时发生)、1 例致死性颅内出血(未使用 DOAC 时发生),无血栓栓塞/卒中事件。
在 AF 发作频率低且中危的患者中,PM/ICD 指导的 DOAC 给药是可行的,可将抗凝治疗的使用率降低 75%。虽然本研究没有足够的效能来评估这些结果,但不良事件的发生较少。PM/ICD 指导的 DOAC 给药可能是一种可行的替代慢性抗凝治疗的方法。需要进一步的研究。