Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA (A.C.P., P.A.H., M.P.T.).
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, CA (A.C.P., J.F., M.A., P.A.H., M.P.T.).
Circulation. 2019 May 28;139(22):2502-2512. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038988. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
Device-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with increased risk of stroke; however, there are no clearly defined thresholds of AF burden at which to initiate oral anticoagulation (OAC). We sought to describe OAC prescription practice variation in response to new device-detected AF and the association with outcomes.
We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Veterans Health Administration linked to remote monitoring data that included day-level AF burden. We included patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and remote monitoring from 2011 to 2014, CHADS-VASc score ≥2, and no prior stroke or OAC receipt in the preceding 2 years. We determined the proportion of patients prescribed OAC within 90 days after new device-detected AF across a range of AF thresholds (≥6 minutes to >24 hours) and examined site variation in OAC prescription. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regressions to determine the association of OAC prescription with stroke by device-detected AF burden.
Among 10 212 patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, 4570 (45%), 3969 (39%), 3263 (32%), and 2469 (24%) had device-detected AF >6 minutes, >1 hour, >6 hours, and >24 hours, respectively. For device-detected AF >1 hour, 1712 patients met inclusion criteria (72±10 years; 1.5% female; CHADS-VASc score 4.0±1.4; HAS-BLED score 2.6±1.1). The proportion receiving OAC varied based on device-detected AF burden (≥6 minutes: 272/2101 [13%]; >1 hour: 273/1712 [16%]; >6 hours: 263/1279 [21%]; >24 hours: 224/818 [27%]). Across 52 sites (N=1329 patients), there was substantial site-level variation in OAC prescription after device-detected AF >1 hour (median, 16%; range, 3%-67%; median odds ratio, 1.56 [95% credible interval, 1.49-1.71]). In adjusted models, OAC prescription after device-detected AF >24 hours was associated with reduced stroke risk (hazard ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10-0.81; P=0.02), although the propensity-adjusted model was significant when AF lasted at least 6 minutes.
Among veterans with cardiac implantable electronic devices, device-detected AF is common. There is large practice variation in 90-day OAC initiation after new device-detected AF, with low rates of treatment overall, even for episodes that last >24 hours. The strongest association of OAC with reduction in stroke was observed after device-detected AF >24 hours. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these observational findings.
器械检测到的心房颤动(AF)与中风风险增加相关;然而,目前尚无明确定义的 AF 负担阈值,以启动口服抗凝治疗(OAC)。我们旨在描述针对新的器械检测到的 AF 的 OAC 处方实践变化及其与结局的关系。
我们使用来自退伍军人健康管理局的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究,该数据与包括每日 AF 负担在内的远程监测数据相关联。我们纳入了 2011 年至 2014 年期间具有心脏植入式电子设备和远程监测的患者,CHADS-VASc 评分≥2,且在过去 2 年内没有中风或 OAC 治疗史。我们确定了在一系列 AF 阈值(≥6 分钟至>24 小时)范围内新的器械检测到的 AF 后 90 天内 OAC 处方的比例,并检查了 OAC 处方的地点差异。我们使用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归来确定 OAC 处方与器械检测到的 AF 负担相关的中风之间的关联。
在 10212 例心脏植入式电子设备患者中,分别有 4570 例(45%)、3969 例(39%)、3263 例(32%)和 2469 例(24%)患者的器械检测到的 AF >6 分钟、>1 小时、>6 小时和>24 小时。对于器械检测到的 AF >1 小时,1712 例患者符合纳入标准(72±10 岁;1.5%为女性;CHADS-VASc 评分为 4.0±1.4;HAS-BLED 评分为 2.6±1.1)。接受 OAC 的比例根据器械检测到的 AF 负担而有所不同(≥6 分钟:272/2101 [13%];>1 小时:273/1712 [16%];>6 小时:263/1279 [21%];>24 小时:224/818 [27%])。在 52 个地点(N=1329 例患者)中,在器械检测到的 AF >1 小时后,OAC 处方存在显著的地点差异(中位数,16%;范围,3%-67%;中位数优势比,1.56 [95%置信区间,1.49-1.71])。在调整后的模型中,器械检测到的 AF >24 小时后 OAC 处方与中风风险降低相关(风险比,0.28;95%CI,0.10-0.81;P=0.02),尽管当 AF 持续至少 6 分钟时,倾向评分调整模型具有统计学意义。
在具有心脏植入式电子设备的退伍军人中,器械检测到的 AF 很常见。在新的器械检测到的 AF 后 90 天内开始 OAC 治疗的实践存在很大差异,总体治疗率较低,即使是持续时间>24 小时的发作也是如此。与中风风险降低相关性最强的 OAC 是在器械检测到的 AF >24 小时后观察到的。需要进行随机试验来证实这些观察性发现。