• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床试验的统计效力在效应大小保持稳定的情况下提高了:对 1975 年至 2014 年间的 136212 项临床试验的实证分析。

Statistical power of clinical trials increased while effect size remained stable: an empirical analysis of 136,212 clinical trials between 1975 and 2014.

机构信息

Department of Child Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85090, Utrecht 3508 AB, The Netherlands.

Department of Child Neurology, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, P.O. Box 85090, Utrecht 3508 AB, The Netherlands; Biomedical MR Imaging and Spectroscopy group, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.06.014
PMID:29981870
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the statistical power of randomized clinical trials and examine developments over time.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

We analyzed the statistical power in 136,212 clinical trials between 1975 and 2014 extracted from meta-analyses from the Cochrane database of systematic reviews. We determined study power to detect standardized effect sizes, where power was based on the meta-analyzed effect size. Average power, effect size, and temporal patterns were examined for all meta-analyses and a subset of significant meta-analyses.

RESULTS

The number of trials with power ≥80% was low (7%) but increased over time: from 5% in 1975-1979 to 9% in 2010-2014. In significant meta-analyses, the proportion of trials with sufficient power increased from 9% to 15% in these years (median power increased from 16% to 23%). This increase was mainly due to increasing sample sizes, while effect sizes remained stable with a median Cohen's h of 0.09 (interquartile range 0.04-0.22) and a median Cohen's d of 0.20 (0.11-0.40).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that sufficient power in clinical trials is still problematic, although the situation is slowly improving. Our data encourage further efforts to increase statistical power in clinical trials to guarantee rigorous and reproducible evidence-based medicine.

摘要

目的

研究随机临床试验的统计功效,并考察其随时间的发展变化。

研究设计与设置

我们分析了 1975 年至 2014 年间从 Cochrane 系统评价数据库的荟萃分析中提取的 136212 项临床试验的统计功效。我们根据荟萃分析的效应大小来确定研究的检测功效,即检测标准化效应大小的能力。考察了所有荟萃分析和部分显著荟萃分析的平均功效、效应大小和时间模式。

结果

功效≥80%的试验数量较少(7%),但随时间推移呈上升趋势:从 1975-1979 年的 5%上升至 2010-2014 年的 9%。在显著的荟萃分析中,具有足够功效的试验比例从这几年的 9%增加到 15%(中位数功效从 16%增加到 23%)。这种增加主要是由于样本量的增加,而效应大小保持稳定,Cohen's h 的中位数为 0.09(四分位距 0.04-0.22),Cohen's d 的中位数为 0.20(0.11-0.40)。

结论

本研究表明,临床试验中足够的功效仍然是一个问题,尽管情况正在缓慢改善。我们的数据鼓励进一步努力提高临床试验的统计功效,以保证严谨和可重复的循证医学。

相似文献

1
Statistical power of clinical trials increased while effect size remained stable: an empirical analysis of 136,212 clinical trials between 1975 and 2014.临床试验的统计效力在效应大小保持稳定的情况下提高了:对 1975 年至 2014 年间的 136212 项临床试验的实证分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Oct;102:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
2
Novel Effect Size Interpretation Guidelines and an Evaluation of Statistical Power in Rehabilitation Research.新型效应量解释指南及康复研究中统计功效的评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Dec;101(12):2219-2226. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.02.017. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
3
Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis.系统评价与Meta分析中的序贯试验分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Mar 6;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0315-7.
4
5
Subgroup analyses in randomized trials: risks of subgroup-specific analyses; power and sample size for the interaction test.随机试验中的亚组分析:亚组特异性分析的风险;交互作用检验的效能和样本量
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Mar;57(3):229-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.08.009.
6
Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.临床神经心理学研究的统计功效与效应量
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2001 Jun;23(3):399-406. doi: 10.1076/jcen.23.3.399.1181.
7
Covariate adjustments in randomized controlled trials increased study power and reduced biasedness of effect size estimation.随机对照试验中的协变量调整提高了研究效能,并降低了效应大小估计的偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
8
Risk of bias: a simulation study of power to detect study-level moderator effects in meta-analysis.偏倚风险:一项关于在荟萃分析中检测研究水平调节效应效能的模拟研究
Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 28;2:107. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-107.
9
[An investigation of the statistical power of the effect size in randomized controlled trials for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using Chinese medicine].[关于使用中药治疗2型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验中效应量统计功效的调查]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;32(1):119-23.
10
Meta-analyses of cluster randomization trials. Power considerations.整群随机试验的Meta分析。效能考量。
Eval Health Prof. 2003 Sep;26(3):340-51. doi: 10.1177/0163278703255234.

引用本文的文献

1
Exercise-induced MyoD mRNA Expression in Young and Older Human Skeletal Muscle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.运动诱导的年轻和老年人类骨骼肌中MyoD mRNA表达:系统评价与荟萃分析
Sports Med. 2025 May 3. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02207-4.
2
Reporting of cluster randomised crossover trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration.整群随机交叉试验的报告:CONSORT 2010声明的扩展及解释与详述
BMJ. 2025 Jan 6;388:e080472. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-080472.
3
The VertiGO! Trial protocol: A prospective, single-center, patient-blinded study to evaluate efficacy and safety of prolonged daily stimulation with a multichannel vestibulocochlear implant prototype in bilateral vestibulopathy patients.
VertiGO! 试验方案:一项前瞻性、单中心、患者盲法研究,旨在评估多通道前庭耳蜗植入体原型在双侧前庭病患者中的长期每日刺激的疗效和安全性。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301032. eCollection 2024.
4
Finding the right power balance: Better study design and collaboration can reduce dependence on statistical power.找到合适的权力平衡:更好的研究设计和协作可以减少对统计功效的依赖。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Jan 8;22(1):e3002423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002423. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
DNA oxidation after exercise: a systematic review and meta-analysis.运动后的DNA氧化:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 31;14:1275867. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1275867. eCollection 2023.
6
Empirical methods for the validation of time-to-event mathematical models taking into account uncertainty and variability: application to EGFR + lung adenocarcinoma.考虑不确定性和变异性的时间事件数学模型验证的经验方法:在 EGFR+肺腺癌中的应用。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05430-w.
7
Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values.基于发表的 p 值估计医学期刊中(随机)临床试验的错误发现风险。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 30;18(8):e0290084. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290084. eCollection 2023.
8
Methodology reporting improved over time in 176,469 randomized controlled trials.方法学报告在 176469 项随机对照试验中随着时间的推移而改善。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;162:19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.08.004. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
9
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.发表偏倚对生态学和进化生物学中的效应大小、统计功效和幅度(M 型)以及符号(S 型)错误有影响。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y.
10
A Meta-Research of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Mental Health: Comparing Pharmacological to Non-Pharmacological Interventions from 1955 to 2020.心理健康领域随机对照试验的元研究:1955 年至 2020 年比较药物干预与非药物干预
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Sep;68(9):639-648. doi: 10.1177/07067437231154993. Epub 2023 Feb 6.