University of St Andrews, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AZ, United Kingdom.
University of St Andrews, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9AZ, United Kingdom.
Curr Biol. 2018 Jul 23;28(14):2309-2313.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.052. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Imagining the future is a powerful tool for making plans and solving problems. It is thought to rely on the episodic system which also underpins remembering a specific past event [1-3]. However, the emergence of episodic future thinking over development and evolution is debated [4-9]. One key source of positive evidence in pre-schoolers and animals is the "spoon test" or item choice test [4, 10], in which participants encounter a problem in one context and then a choice of items in another context, one of which is the solution to the problem. A majority of studies report that most children choose the right item by age 4 [10-15, cf.16]. Apes and corvids have also been shown to pass versions of the test [17-19]. However, it has been suggested that a simpler mechanism could be driving choice: the participant simply chooses the item that has been assigned salience or value, without necessarily imagining the future event [16, 20-23]. We developed a new test in which two of the items offered to children were associated with positive outcomes, but only one was still useful. We found that older children (5-, 6-, and 7-year-olds) chose the correct item at above chance levels, but younger children (3- and 4-year-olds) did not. In further tests, 4-year-olds showed an intact memory for the encoding event. We conclude that positive association substantially impacts performance on item choice tests in 4-year-olds and that future planning may have a more protracted developmental trajectory than episodic memory.
想象未来是制定计划和解决问题的有力工具。人们认为它依赖于情景记忆系统,该系统也支持对特定过去事件的记忆[1-3]。然而,关于情景记忆系统是否在发展和进化中出现,还存在争议[4-9]。在学龄前儿童和动物中,一个关键的正面证据来源是“勺子测试”或项目选择测试[4,10],在该测试中,参与者在一个情境中遇到一个问题,然后在另一个情境中选择项目,其中一个项目是问题的解决方案。大多数研究报告表明,大多数孩子在 4 岁时就能通过正确选择[10-15,cf.16]。黑猩猩和乌鸦也通过了该测试的版本[17-19]。然而,有人认为一种更简单的机制可能在驱动选择:参与者只是选择被赋予显著或价值的项目,而不一定想象未来的事件[16,20-23]。我们开发了一种新的测试,其中向儿童提供的两个项目与积极的结果相关联,但只有一个仍然有用。我们发现,年龄较大的儿童(5、6 和 7 岁)以高于机会水平的概率选择了正确的项目,但年龄较小的儿童(3 岁和 4 岁)没有。在进一步的测试中,4 岁的儿童对编码事件表现出完整的记忆。我们得出结论,积极联想极大地影响了 4 岁儿童在项目选择测试中的表现,而未来规划可能比情景记忆具有更长的发展轨迹。