Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, USA.
School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, USA.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018 Sep;37(6):774-781. doi: 10.1111/dar.12839. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
Clerks and servers at alcohol establishments often fail to verify age. Using mystery shoppers to provide performance feedback is one approach to improving age verification. Few controlled studies have evaluated mystery shop interventions. This paper reports on a cluster randomised cross-over trial of a mystery shop intervention in 16 communities in four US states.
The intervention comprised monthly mystery shops after which clerks and servers received immediate feedback to reinforce age verification. Managers received monthly reports. Communities in each state were matched into pairs and, following a 3-month baseline, were randomly assigned within each pair to receive the intervention beginning after the fourth (Early Intervention) or the tenth (Delayed Intervention) mystery shop. On average, 17 (range = 14-20) randomly selected on-premises and 18 (range = 11-23) off-premises outlets participated in each community (N = 557).
Fixed effects multi-level logistic regressions indicated that the intervention led to a two-fold increase in the odds of age verification, odds ratio (OR) = 2.05; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.76, 2.39. Overall, ID-checking increased from an average of 80% pre-intervention to 94-96% by the end of the program. Significant effects were found for on-premises, OR = 1.79; P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.43, 2.24, and off-premises establishments, OR = 2.29; P < 0.001; 95% CI 1.86, 2.82.
Mystery shop interventions can increase age verification for alcohol purchases and may be an effective supplement to compliance checks and responsible beverage service programs.
酒吧和酒廊的服务员和酒保经常未能核实顾客年龄。使用神秘顾客提供绩效反馈是改善年龄验证的一种方法。很少有对照研究评估过神秘购物干预。本文报告了在美国四个州的 16 个社区进行的一项神秘购物干预的集群随机交叉试验。
干预措施包括每月进行神秘购物,之后服务员和酒保会立即收到反馈,以加强年龄验证。经理每月会收到报告。每个州的社区被配对,并在基线期 3 个月后,根据第四次(早期干预)或第十次(延迟干预)神秘购物后,随机分配到每组中的一个干预组。平均每个社区有 17 个(范围= 14-20)随机选择的现场和 18 个(范围= 11-23)场外场所参与(N= 557)。
固定效应多层次逻辑回归表明,干预措施使年龄验证的可能性增加了两倍,优势比(OR)= 2.05;P < 0.001;95%置信区间(CI)为 1.76-2.39。总体而言,ID 检查率从干预前的平均 80%增加到项目结束时的 94-96%。在现场,OR= 1.79;P < 0.001;95%CI 为 1.43-2.24,和场外场所,OR= 2.29;P < 0.001;95%CI 为 1.86-2.82,都发现了显著效果。
神秘购物干预可以增加对酒精购买的年龄验证,并且可能是合规检查和负责任的饮料服务计划的有效补充。