1 Research Fellow, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, University of Manchester, UK.
2 Research Fellow, Centre for Primary Care, University of Manchester, UK.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Oct;23(4):243-251. doi: 10.1177/1355819618788100. Epub 2018 Jul 8.
Objective To explore the perceptions of relevant stakeholders in terms of targeting the 'right' patients for integrated care. Methods Secondary analysis of qualitative interviews with relevant stakeholders (including programme managers, programme initiators, a representative of the payers, medical and social care professionals and allied health services staff) from two integrated care sites in England. A thematic analysis was conducted of cross-cutting themes. Results Both sites focused on individualized management of 'high-risk' patients through multidisciplinary team case management. The data-driven approach to targeting patients, recommended in the policy literature, did not align with stakeholders' experience of selecting patients in practice. The 'right' patients were at lower risk than those recommended by policy, and their complexities were identified as comprising mostly social rather than medical issues. Conclusions These findings raise timely questions about the individualized management approach. They potentially explain why management of high-risk patients has not been found to be effective using quantitative measures, undermining the assumption that this approach will lead to cost savings. There is a need to expand beyond an individually targeted approach to incorporate prevention and to address social issues.
目的 探讨相关利益攸关方在为综合护理选择“合适”患者方面的看法。
方法 对英格兰两个综合护理点的相关利益攸关方(包括项目管理人员、项目发起人、支付方代表、医疗和社会护理专业人员以及相关健康服务人员)的定性访谈进行二次分析。采用跨主题分析方法进行分析。
结果 两个地点都通过多学科团队病例管理专注于对“高危”患者进行个体化管理。政策文献中推荐的针对患者的基于数据的方法与利益攸关方在实践中选择患者的经验不一致。“合适”的患者的风险低于政策建议的患者,他们的复杂性被确定主要是社会问题而不是医疗问题。
结论 这些发现及时提出了关于个体化管理方法的问题。它们可能解释了为什么使用定量措施并未发现对高危患者的管理有效,从而破坏了这种方法将带来成本节约的假设。有必要超越个体化目标的方法,纳入预防措施并解决社会问题。