• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线性切口与冲切技术在骨锚式助听器手术中的比较。

Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Otoneurosurgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital, Piacenza, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Oct;41(5):474-480. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1048.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N1048
PMID:34734584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8569658/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate mean surgical time, incidence of soft tissue reactions, implant survival and intraoperative complications in both minimally invasive ponto surgery (MIPS) and the linear incision with tissue preservation technique (LT).

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out on 48 bone anchored hearing system (BAHS) patients between 2014 and 2019: 13 patients had undergone LT and formed one group, while 35 patients had undergone MIPS and formed the second group. Mean surgical time, intraoperative complications, implant loss and skin reaction were assessed at each post-operative examination. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The difference in the mean surgical time of 15 mins for MIPS and 36 mins for LT was statistically significant. No intraoperative complications were reported and implant survival was 100% in both groups. The incidence of adverse skin reactions was 7.7% for the LT group and 0% for the MIPS group at first follow-up examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical mean time is shorter for MIPS, making this procedure more suitable for local anaesthesia and more cost effective. Moreover, both LT and MIPS demonstrate good surgical outcomes in terms of skin reactions according to Holgers score and equally excellent implant survival.

摘要

目的

评估微创桥小脑角手术(MIPS)与保留组织的直线切口技术(LT)的平均手术时间、软组织反应发生率、种植体存活率和术中并发症。

方法

回顾性分析了 2014 年至 2019 年间 48 例骨锚定式听力系统(BAHS)患者的资料:13 例患者接受 LT,为一组;35 例患者接受 MIPS,为二组。在每次术后检查时评估平均手术时间、术中并发症、种植体丢失和皮肤反应。采用曼-惠特尼 U 检验进行统计学分析。

结果

MIPS 的平均手术时间为 15 分钟,LT 的平均手术时间为 36 分钟,差异具有统计学意义。两组均未报告术中并发症,种植体存活率均为 100%。LT 组首次随访时皮肤不良反应发生率为 7.7%,MIPS 组为 0%。

结论

MIPS 的手术时间更短,更适合局部麻醉,且更具成本效益。此外,根据 Holgers 评分,LT 和 MIPS 在皮肤反应方面均显示出良好的手术效果,种植体存活率同样优异。

相似文献

1
Comparison between linear incision and punch techniques for bone anchored hearing aid surgery.线性切口与冲切技术在骨锚式助听器手术中的比较。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2021 Oct;41(5):474-480. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N1048.
2
Experience with Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Linear Incision Approach for Pediatric and Adult Bone Anchored Hearing Implants.小儿及成人骨锚式助听器的微创桥接手术和线性切口入路经验
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Apr;129(4):380-387. doi: 10.1177/0003489419891451. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
3
Surgical and audiological results of bone-anchored hearing aids: comparison of two surgical techniques.骨锚式助听器的手术和听力结果:两种手术技术的比较。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul-Aug;88(4):533-538. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
4
Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.骨锚定听觉设备植入的冲切技术标准化:MIPS 手术套件的评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):e631-e635. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002291.
5
Six-Month Clinical Outcomes for Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation.骨锚定式听力植入物的六个月临床结果:微创耳内 Pont 手术与保留组织的线性切口技术的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Apr;41(4):e475-e483. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002562.
6
Tissue Preservation Techniques for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Surgery.骨锚式助听器手术中的组织保存技术。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Aug 1;42(7):1044-1050. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003157.
7
A Clinical Evaluation of Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery With a Modified Drill System for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.改良钻头系统微创耳内式骨锚定助听植入术的临床评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2021 Sep 1;42(8):1192-1200. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003195.
8
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus the Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.微创耳后入路与保留软组织的直线切口技术在骨导式助听植入中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Aug;39(7):882-893. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001852.
9
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.与不进行软组织复位的线性切口技术相比,用于骨传导听力植入物的微创桥手术:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2016 Nov 9;17(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1662-0.
10
Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.宽直径骨锚式听力系统植入物:组织减容与组织保留技术的长期随访数据比较
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Feb;276(2):349-356. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5228-5. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive surgery as a new clinical standard for bone anchored hearing implants-real-world data from 10 years of follow-up and 228 surgeries.微创手术作为骨锚式听力植入物的新临床标准——来自10年随访和228例手术的真实世界数据。
Front Surg. 2023 Jul 3;10:1209927. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1209927. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.一种用于经皮骨传导装置植入的新型钻孔系统的评估
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 21;9:858117. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.858117. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Minimal Access Bone Anchored Hearing Implant Surgery and a New Surface Modified Titanium Implant, the Birmingham Experience.新型微创骨锚定听力植入手术和一种新的表面改性钛植入物,伯明翰经验。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1326-1332. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002423.
2
Standardization of the Punch Technique for the Implantation of Bone Anchored Auditory Devices: Evaluation of the MIPS Surgical Set.骨锚定听觉设备植入的冲切技术标准化:MIPS 手术套件的评估。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jul;40(6):e631-e635. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002291.
3
Transitions in auditory rehabilitation with bone conduction implants (BCI).
骨传导植入物(BCI)在听觉康复中的转变。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Apr;139(4):379-382. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1592220. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
4
Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique.经皮植入骨导设备的三年临床和听力学结果:组织保存技术与组织缩减技术的比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):335-343. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002105.
5
Long term follow-up demonstrating stability and patient satisfaction of minimally invasive punch technique for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.长期随访显示微创打孔技术用于经皮骨锚定式助听设备的稳定性和患者满意度。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov 20;47(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40463-018-0316-5.
6
A Comparison of the Operative Techniques and the Postoperative Complications for Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Implantation.骨锚式助听器植入术的手术技术与术后并发症比较
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;22(4):368-373. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1613685. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
7
Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery Versus the Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Bone Conduction Hearing Implants: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.微创耳后入路与保留软组织的直线切口技术在骨导式助听植入中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Otol Neurotol. 2018 Aug;39(7):882-893. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001852.
8
Bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: our experience with linear incision and punch techniques.骨锚式听力植入手术:我们采用线性切口和打孔技术的经验。
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2018 Jun;38(3):257-263. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1694.
9
Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.经皮骨锚定式听力植入手术:保留组织的直线切口技术与组织减少的直线切口技术比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jul;275(7):1737-1747. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5005-5. Epub 2018 May 30.
10
Direct cost comparison of minimally invasive punch technique versus traditional approaches for percutaneous bone anchored hearing devices.经皮骨锚式听力装置微创打孔技术与传统方法的直接成本比较
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 12;46(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40463-017-0222-2.