Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛与普拉格雷治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的安全性和疗效。

Safety and Efficacy in Prasugrel- Versus Ticagrelor-Treated Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Vascular Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Medical Center Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018 Oct;72(4):186-190. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000609.

Abstract

Prasugrel and ticagrelor are recommended over clopidogrel in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In this registry analysis, we compared efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel P2Y12 inhibition in patients with STEMI. We included 318 patients in this single-center analysis. Twelve-month follow-up was conducted during ambulatory care at our department. Patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel during the follow-up period. Prescription of prasugrel or ticagrelor, respectively, was according to the preference of the treating physician. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) [death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and unplanned reintervention] and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) bleeding (major/minor) were registered during hospitalization and follow-up. TIMI bleeding events were more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients [17 vs. 5 patients, hazard ratio (HR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-6.6; log-rank P value = 0.01]. Prasugrel-treated patients were significantly younger (ticagrelor 63 ± 12 years vs. prasugrel 57 ± 10; P < 0.0001). Besides that, patients' characteristics were similar in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that ticagrelor medication was independently associated with bleeding risk after adjustment for age, percutaneous coronary intervention approach (femoral vs. radial), diabetes mellitus, and kidney function (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.0-7.4; P = 0.043). In patients treated with ticagrelor, 35 MACCE were detected. There was no difference as compared to prasugrel-treated patients (24 events, HR 1.24, 95% CI 0.79-2.09; log-rank P value = 0.41). TIMI bleeding events were more frequent in ticagrelor-treated patients with STEMI during 12-month follow-up. There were no differences in MACCE between groups in this registry analysis.

摘要

替格瑞洛和普拉格雷被推荐用于 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者。在这项登记分析中,我们比较了 STEMI 患者中替格瑞洛和普拉格雷对 P2Y12 抑制的疗效和安全性。我们对这项单中心分析纳入了 318 例患者。在我们科室的门诊随访期间进行了 12 个月的随访。在随访期间,患者接受阿司匹林和替格瑞洛或普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗。替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的处方分别根据治疗医生的偏好。主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE)[死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、卒中和未计划的再次介入]和心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)出血(主要/次要)在住院和随访期间进行登记。替格瑞洛治疗组的 TIMI 出血事件更为频繁[17 例 vs. 5 例,风险比(HR)2.85,95%置信区间(CI)1.2-6.6;对数秩检验 P 值=0.01]。普拉格雷治疗组的患者明显更年轻(替格瑞洛组 63 ± 12 岁 vs. 普拉格雷组 57 ± 10 岁;P<0.0001)。除此之外,两组患者的特征相似。多变量分析显示,在调整年龄、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗途径(股动脉 vs. 桡动脉)、糖尿病和肾功能后,替格瑞洛药物与出血风险独立相关(HR 3.01;95%CI 1.0-7.4;P=0.043)。在接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者中,检测到 35 例 MACCE。与普拉格雷治疗组相比,无差异(24 例事件,HR 1.24,95%CI 0.79-2.09;对数秩检验 P 值=0.41)。在接受替格瑞洛治疗的 STEMI 患者中,12 个月随访期间 TIMI 出血事件更为频繁。在这项登记分析中,两组间 MACCE 无差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验