• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。

Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1177/2047487319836327
PMID:30862233
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of short versus long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the third generation P2Y12 antagonists prasugrel or ticagrelor, in patients with acute coronary syndromes treated with percutaneous coronary intervention remain to be clearly defined due to current evidences limited to patients treated with clopidogrel.

METHODS

All acute coronary syndrome patients from the REgistry of New Antiplatelets in patients with Myocardial Infarction (RENAMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and treated with aspirin, prasugrel or ticagrelor were stratified according to DAPT duration, that is, shorter than 12 months (D1 group), 12 months (D2 group) and longer than 12 months (D3 group). The three groups were compared before and after propensity score matching. Net adverse clinical events (NACEs), defined as a combination of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and major bleedings (including therefore all cause death, myocardial infarction and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 3-5 bleeding), were the primary end points, MACEs (a composite of all cause death and myocardial infarction) the secondary one. Single components of NACEs were co-secondary end points, along with BARC 2-5 bleeding, cardiovascular death and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

A total of 4424 patients from the RENAMI registry with available data on DAPT duration were included in the model. After propensity score matching, 628 patients from each group were selected. After 20 months of follow up, DAPT for 12 months and DAPT for longer than 12 months significantly reduced the risk of NACE (D1 11.6% . D2 6.7% . D3 7.2%,  = 0.003) and MACE (10% . 6.2% . 2.4%,  < 0.001) compared with DAPT for less than 12 months. These differences were driven by a reduced risk of all cause death (7.8% . 1.3% . 1.6%,  < 0.001), cardiovascular death (5.1% . 1.0% . 1.2%,  < 0.0001) and recurrent myocardial infarction (8.3% . 5.2% . 3.5%,  = 0.002). NACEs were lower with longer DAPT despite a higher risk of BARC 2-5 bleedings (4.6% . 5.7% . 6.2%,  = 0.04) and a trend towards a higher risk of BARC 3-5 bleedings (2.4% . 3.3% . 3.9%,  = 0.06). These results were not consistent for female patients and those older than 75 years old, due to an increased risk of bleedings which exceeded the reduction in myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSION

In unselected real world acute coronary syndrome patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention, DAPT with prasugrel or ticagrelor prolonged beyond 12 months markedly reduces fatal and non-fatal ischaemic events, offsetting the increased risk deriving from the higher bleeding risk. On the contrary, patients >75 years old and female ones showed a less favourable risk-benefit ratio for longer DAPT due to excess of bleedings.

摘要

介绍

基于第三代 P2Y12 拮抗剂普拉格雷或替格瑞洛,在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,短期与长期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)的获益仍需明确界定,这是因为目前的证据仅限于接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者。

方法

所有接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并接受阿司匹林、普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的心肌梗死患者新抗血小板药物注册研究(REnAMI)中的急性冠状动脉综合征患者,根据 DAPT 持续时间分层,即短于 12 个月(D1 组)、12 个月(D2 组)和长于 12 个月(D3 组)。在进行倾向评分匹配前后对三组进行比较。净不良临床事件(NACEs),定义为主要不良心脏事件(MACEs)和主要出血(包括因此所有原因死亡、心肌梗死和 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] 3-5 出血)的组合,是主要终点,MACEs(所有原因死亡和心肌梗死的复合)是次要终点。NACEs 的单一组成部分是次要终点,以及 BARC 2-5 出血、心血管死亡和支架血栓形成。

结果

共有 4424 名来自 RENAMI 注册中心的患者有 DAPT 持续时间的数据纳入模型。在进行倾向评分匹配后,每组选择 628 名患者。在 20 个月的随访后,与 DAPT 少于 12 个月相比,DAPT 持续 12 个月和 DAPT 持续时间超过 12 个月显著降低了 NACE(D1 11.6%、D2 6.7%、D3 7.2%,=0.003)和 MACE(10%、6.2%、2.4%,<0.001)的风险。这些差异是由全因死亡风险降低(7.8%、1.3%、1.6%,<0.001)、心血管死亡风险降低(5.1%、1.0%、1.2%,<0.0001)和复发性心肌梗死风险降低(8.3%、5.2%、3.5%,=0.002)驱动的。尽管 BARC 2-5 出血风险较高(4.6%、5.7%、6.2%,=0.04)且 BARC 3-5 出血风险呈上升趋势(2.4%、3.3%、3.9%,=0.06),但延长 DAPT 时间可降低 NACEs。这些结果在女性患者和年龄大于 75 岁的患者中并不一致,这是因为出血风险的增加超过了心肌梗死的减少。

结论

在未选择的接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,普拉格雷或替格瑞洛延长超过 12 个月的 DAPT 可显著降低致命和非致命性缺血事件,抵消因更高出血风险而导致的风险增加。相比之下,年龄大于 75 岁和女性患者由于出血过多,延长 DAPT 的风险获益比不太有利。

相似文献

1
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in ACS Patients Treated with PCI: A Propensity Score Analysis of the RENAMI and BleeMACS Registries.经 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的疗效和安全性:RENAME 和 BleeMACS 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Jun;20(3):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00373-1.
3
Real-World Data of Prasugrel vs. Ticagrelor in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Results from the RENAMI Registry.真实世界研究:普拉格雷与替格瑞洛用于急性心肌梗死的疗效对比:RENA MI 注册研究结果。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2019 Aug;19(4):381-391. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00339-3.
4
Prasugrel or ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome and diabetes: a propensity matched substudy of RENAMI.急性冠脉综合征合并糖尿病患者中普拉格雷或替格瑞洛的应用:RENAME 研究的倾向性匹配亚组研究。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Sep;8(6):536-542. doi: 10.1177/2048872618802783. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
5
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
6
Platelet reactivity inhibition following ticagrelor loading dose in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者替格瑞洛负荷剂量后的血小板反应抑制。
J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Dec;17(12):2188-2195. doi: 10.1111/jth.14592. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的应用。
Circulation. 2020 Dec 15;142(24):2329-2337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050244. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Impact of body mass index on clinical outcome among elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the ELDERLY ACS 2 trial.体重指数对行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者临床结局的影响:来自 ELDERLY ACS 2 试验的观察。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020 May 7;30(5):730-737. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Incidence and predictors of bleeding in ACS patients treated with PCI and prasugrel or ticagrelor: An analysis from the RENAMI registry.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)联合普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者出血的发生率及预测因素:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 15;273:29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Aspirin-free strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome based on the subtypes of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk: the STOPDAPT-3 trial.基于急性冠状动脉综合征亚型和高出血风险的急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗时的阿司匹林-free 策略:STOPDAPT-3 试验。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2024 Aug 14;10(5):374-390. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae009.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended use of dual antiplatelet therapy among older adults with acute coronary syndromes and associated variables: a cohort study.老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的延长使用及其相关变量:一项队列研究
Thromb J. 2023 Mar 21;21(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00476-5.
2
Long-term use of clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性心肌梗死后患者长期使用氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷的比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 23;18(2):e0278993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278993. eCollection 2023.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older with Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
75 岁及以上冠心病患者的双联抗血小板治疗:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Sep 15;2022:3111840. doi: 10.1155/2022/3111840. eCollection 2022.
4
Antithrombotic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes.老年急性冠脉综合征患者的抗栓治疗
J Clin Med. 2022 May 26;11(11):3008. doi: 10.3390/jcm11113008.
5
Undiagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcome in patients with acute MI and no COVID-19 symptoms.急性心肌梗死且无 COVID-19 症状患者中未诊断的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和结局。
Open Heart. 2021 Apr;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2021-001617.
6
Optimal Strategy for Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in High-Risk "TWILIGHT-like" Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病高危“类TWILIGHT”患者冠状动脉药物洗脱支架植入术后抗血小板治疗的优化策略
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Nov 27;7:586491. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.586491. eCollection 2020.
7
Long-term antithrombotic management patterns in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: 2-year observations from the EPICOR Asia study.亚洲急性冠脉综合征患者的长期抗血栓治疗模式:EPICOR Asia 研究的 2 年观察结果。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):999-1008. doi: 10.1002/clc.23400. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of an invasive strategy compared to a conservative approach in patients > 65 years old with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了在年龄 > 65 岁的非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中,侵入性策略与保守策略的有效性。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 27;15(2):e0229491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229491. eCollection 2020.
9
How do cardiologists select patients for dual antiplatelet therapy continuation beyond 1 year after a myocardial infarction? Insights from the EYESHOT Post-MI Study.心内科医生如何为心肌梗死后超过 1 年的患者选择继续双联抗血小板治疗?EYESHOT 心梗后研究的见解。
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Nov;42(11):1113-1120. doi: 10.1002/clc.23262. Epub 2019 Aug 31.