Kosar E, Waters R S, Tsukahara N, Asanuma H
Brain Res. 1985 Oct 14;345(1):68-78. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(85)90837-6.
Details of the distribution of terminal sites of the projection fibers from area 2 of the sensory cortex to the motor cortex were studied and compared with the distribution of terminals from the ventrolateral (VL) nucleus of the thalamus to the motor cortex. The results obtained were as follows: Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) in area 2 produced measurable short-latency EPSPs only in neurons located in layers II and III of the motor cortex, whereas VL stimulation produced short-latency EPSPs in neurons throughout the depths of the motor cortex. The time from the beginning to the peak of the EPSPs was not significantly different for area 2- and VL-elicited EPSPs suggesting that there was no systematic difference between effective terminal sites for both inputs. However, there was a difference when a given neuron received both inputs suggesting that there was a segregation between the two inputs within a given cell. The majority of area 2-elicited EPSPs were smooth and monophasic, but some (40%) of them showed double peaks indicating that some neurons received mono- and disynaptic inputs from area 2. Intracellular injections of HRP suggested that neurons receiving input from area 2 were predominantly multipolar non-pyramidal neurons in layers II and III whereas neurons receiving thalamic input were pyramidal as well as non-pyramidal cells. Field potentials in the motor cortex evoked by area 2 stimulation did not change polarity in the depths of the cortex and therefore, differed from the VL-evoked potentials suggesting differences in the mechanisms of generating the electrical fields. It is concluded that association fibers effective for producing EPSPs terminate primarily on non-pyramidal cells in layer II and III whereas VL fibers terminate not only on pyramidal but also on non-pyramidal cells in layers III and V. This study provided a basis for examining the modifiability of association fibers after elimination of VL input to the motor cortex which is reported in the following paper.
研究了感觉皮层2区投射纤维至运动皮层的终末位点分布细节,并与丘脑腹外侧(VL)核至运动皮层的终末分布进行比较。得到的结果如下:在2区进行皮层内微刺激(ICMS)仅在运动皮层II层和III层的神经元中产生可测量的短潜伏期兴奋性突触后电位(EPSP),而VL刺激在运动皮层各深度的神经元中均产生短潜伏期EPSP。2区和VL引发的EPSP从起始到峰值的时间无显著差异,表明两种输入的有效终末位点之间无系统差异。然而,当给定神经元同时接受两种输入时存在差异,表明在给定细胞内两种输入存在分离。大多数2区引发的EPSP是平滑且单相的,但其中一些(40%)显示出双峰,表明一些神经元接受来自2区的单突触和双突触输入。细胞内注射辣根过氧化物酶(HRP)表明,接受2区输入的神经元主要是II层和III层的多极非锥体神经元,而接受丘脑输入的神经元既有锥体神经元也有非锥体神经元。2区刺激诱发的运动皮层场电位在皮层深度不改变极性,因此与VL诱发的电位不同,表明电场产生机制存在差异。结论是,对产生EPSP有效的联合纤维主要终止于II层和III层的非锥体细胞,而VL纤维不仅终止于III层和V层的锥体细胞,也终止于非锥体细胞。本研究为检查在随后论文中报道的消除运动皮层VL输入后联合纤维的可修饰性提供了基础。