Department of Orthopedics, MÁV Hospital Szolnok, Szolnok, Hungary.
Institute of Mathematics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary.
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 9;13(7):e0200245. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200245. eCollection 2018.
The most common and gold standard method to diagnose and follow-up on scoliosis treatment is to capture biplanar X-ray images and then use these to determine the sagittal frontal spinal curvature angles by the Cobb method. Reducing exposure to radiation is an important aspect for consideration, especially regarding children. The ZEBRIS spinal examination method is an external, non-invasive measurement method that uses an ultrasound-based motion analysis system. The aim of this study is to compare angle values of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method with the angle values defined by the gold standard Cobb method on biplanar X-ray images.
Subjects included 19 children with AIS (mean age 14.5±2.1 years, range 8-16 years, frontal plane thoracic Cobb angle 19.95±10.23°, thoracolumbar/lumbar angle 16.57±10.23°). The thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in the sagittal plane and the thoracic and lumbar scoliosis values were calculated by the Cobb method on biplanar X-ray images. The sagittal frontal spinal curvature angles were calculated from the position of the processus spinosus of 19 vertebrae, as determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method. The validity of the ZEBRIS spine examination method was evaluated with Bland-Altman analyses between the sagittal and frontal spinal curvature parameters calculated from data determined by the ZEBRIS spine examination method and data obtained by the Cobb method on the X-ray images.
Thoracic spinal curvature angles in sagittal and in frontal planes can be measured with sufficient accuracy. The slopes of the linear regression lines for thoracic kyphosis (TK) and thoracic scoliosis (TSC) are close to one (1.00 and 0.79 respectively), and the intercept values are below 5 degrees. The correlation between the TK and TSC values determined by the two methods is significant (p = 0.000) and excellent (rTK = 0.95, rTSC = 0.85). The differences are in the limit of agreement. The lumbar lordosis (LL) in the sagittal plane shows a very good correlation (rLL = 0.76); however the differences between the angles determined by the two methods are out of the limit of agreement in patients with major lumbar lordosis (LL≥50°). The thoracolumbar/lumbar spinal curvature angles in the frontal plane determined by ZEBRIS spine examination were underestimated at curvatures larger than 15°, mainly due to the rotational and pathological deformities of the scoliotic vertebrae. However, the correlation between lumbar scoliosis (LSC) values determined by the two methods is significant (p = 0.000) and excellent (rLSC = 0.84), the slopes are below one (0.71), the intercept values are below 5 degrees, and the differences between the angles determined by the two methods are within the limits of agreement. We could conclude that ZEBRIS spinal examination is a valid and reliable method for determination of sagittal and frontal curvatures during the treatment of patients with scoliosis. However, it cannot replace the biplanar X-ray examination for the visualization of spinal curvatures in the sagittal and frontal planes and the rotation of vertebral bodies during the diagnosis and annual evaluation of the progression.
诊断和随访脊柱侧凸治疗最常用且标准的方法是拍摄双平面 X 射线图像,然后使用 Cobb 法确定矢状额状脊柱曲率角度。减少辐射暴露是需要考虑的一个重要方面,特别是对于儿童。ZEBRIS 脊柱检查方法是一种外部、非侵入性的测量方法,使用基于超声的运动分析系统。本研究的目的是比较使用 ZEBRIS 脊柱检查方法确定的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者的角度值与双平面 X 射线图像上金标准 Cobb 法定义的角度值。
研究对象包括 19 名患有 AIS 的儿童(平均年龄 14.5±2.1 岁,范围 8-16 岁,额状面胸弯 Cobb 角 19.95±10.23°,胸腰椎/腰椎 Cobb 角 16.57±10.23°)。在双平面 X 射线图像上通过 Cobb 法计算矢状面的胸椎后凸和腰椎前凸,以及计算胸椎和腰椎侧凸值。通过 ZEBRIS 脊柱检查法确定第 19 个脊椎棘突的位置来计算额状面脊柱前凸曲率角。通过 Bland-Altman 分析评估 ZEBRIS 脊柱检查法在通过 ZEBRIS 脊柱检查法确定的数据和 X 射线图像上的 Cobb 法获得的数据之间的矢状和额状脊柱曲率参数的有效性。
可以以足够的精度测量矢状面和额状面的胸椎曲率角。胸椎后凸(TK)和胸椎侧凸(TSC)的线性回归线斜率接近 1(分别为 1.00 和 0.79),截距值低于 5 度。两种方法确定的 TK 和 TSC 值之间的相关性显著(p=0.000),相关性很好(rTK=0.95,rTSC=0.85)。差异在可接受的范围内。矢状面腰椎前凸(LL)具有很好的相关性(rLL=0.76);然而,在腰椎前凸较大的患者(LL≥50°)中,两种方法确定的角度差异超出了可接受范围。ZEBRIS 脊柱检查法确定的额状面胸腰椎/腰椎脊柱曲率角在大于 15°时被低估,主要是由于脊柱侧凸的椎体的旋转和病理性畸形。然而,两种方法确定的腰椎侧凸(LSC)值之间的相关性显著(p=0.000),相关性良好(rLSC=0.84),斜率小于 1(0.71),截距值低于 5 度,两种方法确定的角度之间的差异在可接受范围内。我们可以得出结论,ZEBRIS 脊柱检查法是一种有效且可靠的方法,可用于治疗脊柱侧凸患者的矢状面和额状面曲率的确定。然而,它不能代替双平面 X 射线检查来可视化矢状面和额状面的脊柱曲率以及椎体在诊断和年度进展评估中的旋转。