From Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA (KJS, RLW, KS, SMS, MP, RNH, MT, EJL, SD, MVK); Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle (KJS, SD); Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle (SMS); Department of Psychosocial and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle (MT); Departments of Pharmacy and Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle (RNH).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Jul-Aug;31(4):578-587. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.04.180021.
This analysis examined patients' perceptions about trust within the doctor-patient relationship related to managing opioid pain medications. We compared perceptions among chronic opioid therapy (COT) patients who were and were not exposed to opioid risk reduction initiatives.
Between 2014 and 2016, we surveyed 1588 adults with chronic pain receiving COT about their trust in their prescribing doctor, their perceptions of their doctor's trust in them, their concerns about opioid prescribing, and their knowledge of opioid safety concerns. The population included adults receiving care in intervention settings that implemented opioid risk reduction initiatives and control settings with similar COT patients that did not.
Overall, 82.2% of COT patients said they trusted their doctor's judgment, with more agreement among patients in the control clinics (86.3%; n = 653) than in the intervention clinics (77.9%; n = 935; = .002). Similarly, slightly more patients in the control clinics believed their physician trusted how they managed their opioid pain medicines (91.1%) compared with the intervention clinics (86.2%; = .002). The percent who worried that their doctor would stop prescribing opioid pain medicine was 29.3% in intervention clinics and 21.8% in control clinics ( = .007).
Although COT patients typically reported favorable perceptions of doctor-patient trust in managing opioid pain medicines, implementation of opioid risk reduction initiatives may have reduced levels of trust for a minority of COT patients. This suggests that it may be possible to implement opioid risk-reduction initiatives while sustaining high levels of doctor-patient trust for most COT patients.
本分析考察了患者对管理阿片类药物疼痛治疗中医生-患者关系信任的看法。我们比较了接受慢性阿片类药物治疗(COT)且接触过阿片类药物风险降低计划与未接触过阿片类药物风险降低计划的患者的看法。
2014 年至 2016 年,我们对 1588 名接受慢性疼痛 COT 治疗的成年人进行了调查,了解他们对处方医生的信任度、对医生对他们信任程度的看法、对阿片类药物处方的担忧以及对阿片类药物安全问题的了解。该人群包括在实施阿片类药物风险降低计划的干预环境中接受治疗的成年人和在没有实施阿片类药物风险降低计划的类似 COT 患者的对照环境中接受治疗的成年人。
总体而言,82.2%的 COT 患者表示信任他们的医生的判断,对照组诊所的患者(86.3%;n=653)比干预组诊所的患者(77.9%;n=935;P=.002)更同意这一观点。同样,对照组诊所的患者中,略多的人认为他们的医生信任他们管理阿片类药物疼痛药物的方式(91.1%),而干预组诊所的患者则为 86.2%(P=.002)。担心医生会停止开阿片类药物疼痛药物的患者比例在干预组诊所为 29.3%,在对照组诊所为 21.8%(P=.007)。
尽管 COT 患者通常对管理阿片类药物疼痛药物的医生-患者信任持有利看法,但阿片类药物风险降低计划的实施可能降低了少数 COT 患者的信任水平。这表明,在大多数 COT 患者中,实施阿片类药物风险降低计划的同时,仍有可能保持高水平的医患信任。