Division of General Medicine (L.M.C.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Center for Healthcare Outcomes & Policy and Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation (L.M.C., B.K.N.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Circulation. 2018 Oct 16;138(16):1643-1650. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.033211.
Black patients have worse in-hospital survival than white patients after in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA), but less is known about long-term outcomes. We sought to assess among IHCA survivors whether there are additional racial differences in survival after hospital discharge and to explore potential reasons for differences.
This was alongitudinal study of patients ≥65 years of age who had an IHCA and survived until hospital discharge between 2000 and 2011 from the national Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry whose data could be linked to Medicare claims data. Sequential hierarchical modified Poisson regression models evaluated the proportion of racial differences explained by patient, hospital, and unmeasured factors. Our exposure was black or white race. Our outcome was survival at 1, 3, and 5 years.
Among 8764 patients who survived to discharge, 7652 (87.3%) were white and 1112 (12.7%) were black. Black patients with IHCA were younger, more frequently female, sicker with more comorbidities, less likely to have a shockable initial cardiac arrest rhythm, and less likely to be evaluated with coronary angiography after initial resuscitation. At discharge, black patients were also more likely to have at least moderate neurological disability and less likely to be discharged home. Compared with white patients and after adjustment only for hospital site, black patients had lower 1-year (43.6% versus 60.2%; relative risk [RR], 0.72), 3-year (31.6% versus 45.3%; RR, 0.71), and 5-year (23.5% versus 35.4%; RR, 0.67; all P<0.001) survival. Adjustment for patient factors explained 29% of racial differences in 1-year survival (RR, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.86), and further adjustment for hospital treatment factors explained an additional 17% of racial differences (RR, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.92). Approximately half of the racial difference in 1-year survival remained unexplained, and the degree to which patient and hospital factors explained racial differences in 3-year and 5-year survival was similar.
Black survivors of IHCA have lower long-term survival compared with white patients, and about half of this difference is not explained by patient factors or treatments after IHCA. Further investigation is warranted to better understand to what degree unmeasured but modifiable factors such as postdischarge care account for unexplained disparities.
院内心脏骤停(IHCA)后,黑种人患者的院内生存率比白种人患者差,但对出院后的长期预后知之甚少。我们旨在评估 IHCA 幸存者出院后的生存情况,是否存在种族差异,并探索差异产生的潜在原因。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2000 年至 2011 年期间从全国 Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation 注册中心出院的≥65 岁、经历 IHCA 且存活至出院的患者,这些患者的数据可与医疗保险索赔数据相关联。序贯分层修正泊松回归模型评估了患者、医院和未测量因素对种族差异的解释比例。我们的暴露因素是黑种人或白种人种族。我们的结局是 1 年、3 年和 5 年的生存率。
在 8764 名存活至出院的患者中,7652 名(87.3%)为白种人,1112 名(12.7%)为黑种人。与 IHCA 的黑种人患者相比,白种人患者更年轻、更多为女性、合并症更多、初始心脏骤停节律更不易除颤、初始复苏后更不易接受冠状动脉造影检查。出院时,黑种人患者的神经功能障碍程度也更严重,且更不可能出院回家。与白种人患者相比,在仅调整医院地点后,黑种人患者的 1 年生存率更低(43.6%比 60.2%;相对风险 [RR],0.72)、3 年生存率更低(31.6%比 45.3%;RR,0.71)、5 年生存率更低(23.5%比 35.4%;RR,0.67;均 P<0.001)。患者因素调整后,1 年生存率的种族差异解释了 29%(RR,0.80;95%置信区间,0.75-0.86),进一步调整医院治疗因素后,种族差异解释了另外 17%(RR,0.85;95%置信区间,0.80-0.92)。1 年生存率的种族差异约有一半无法解释,且患者和医院因素解释 3 年和 5 年生存率种族差异的程度相似。
与白种人患者相比,经历 IHCA 的黑种人幸存者的长期生存率较低,且约有一半的差异无法用患者因素或 IHCA 后治疗来解释。需要进一步研究,以更好地了解出院后护理等未测量但可改变的因素在多大程度上导致了无法解释的差异。