Chan Paul S, McNally Bryan, Nallamothu Brahmajee K, Tang Fengming, Hammill Bradley G, Spertus John A, Curtis Lesley H
Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO
Department of Emergency Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Mar 15;5(3):e002924. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002924.
Most studies on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest have focused on immediate survival. However, little is known about long-term outcomes and resource use among survivors.
Within the national CARES registry, we identified 16 206 adults 65 years or older with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest between 2005 and 2010. Among 1127 patients who were discharged alive, we evaluated whether 1-year mortality, cumulative readmission incidence, and follow-up inpatient costs differed according to patients' race, sex, initial cardiac arrest rhythm, bystander delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, discharge neurological status, and functional status (hospital discharge disposition). Overall 1-year mortality after hospital discharge was 31.8%. Among survivors, there were no long-term mortality differences by sex, race, or initial cardiac arrest rhythm, but worse functional status and severe neurological disability at discharge were associated with higher mortality. Moreover, compared with first responders, cardiopulmonary resuscitation delivered by bystanders was associated with 23% lower mortality (hazard ratio 0.77 [confidence interval 0.58-1.02]). Besides mortality, 638 (56.6%) patients were readmitted within the first year, and the cumulative readmission incidence was 197 per 100 patient-years. Mean 1-year inpatient costs were $23 765±41 002. Younger age, black race, severe neurological disability at discharge, and hospital disposition to a skilled nursing or rehabilitation facility were each associated with higher 1-year inpatient costs (P for all <0.05).
Among elderly survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, nearly 1 in 3 patients die within the first year. Long-term mortality and inpatient costs differed substantially by certain demographic factors, whether cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated by a bystander, discharge neurological status, and hospital disposition.
大多数关于院外心脏骤停的研究都集中在即刻生存情况。然而,对于幸存者的长期预后和资源利用情况却知之甚少。
在国家CARES注册研究中,我们确定了2005年至2010年间16206名65岁及以上的院外心脏骤停成年患者。在1127名存活出院的患者中,我们评估了1年死亡率、累积再入院发生率以及随访住院费用是否因患者的种族、性别、初始心脏骤停心律、旁观者进行心肺复苏情况、出院时神经状态和功能状态(出院处置方式)而有所不同。出院后总体1年死亡率为31.8%。在幸存者中,性别、种族或初始心脏骤停心律对长期死亡率没有差异,但出院时较差的功能状态和严重神经功能残疾与较高的死亡率相关。此外,与急救人员相比,旁观者进行心肺复苏与死亡率降低23%相关(风险比0.77[置信区间0.58 - 1.02])。除死亡率外,638名(56.6%)患者在第一年内再次入院,累积再入院发生率为每100患者年197例。1年平均住院费用为23765美元±41002美元。年龄较小、黑人种族、出院时严重神经功能残疾以及出院至专业护理或康复机构与较高的1年住院费用相关(所有P值<0.05)。
在院外心脏骤停的老年幸存者中,近三分之一的患者在第一年内死亡。长期死亡率和住院费用因某些人口统计学因素、是否由旁观者启动心肺复苏、出院神经状态和出院处置方式而有很大差异。