Université de Toulon, LAMHESS, Toulon, France.
Hôpital Renée Sabran, CRCM, Giens, France.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2018 Sep;118(9):2007-2019. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3923-y. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
We evaluated the validity of predicting peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]O) from submaximal ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and compared the predictive accuracy between overall and differentiated RPE scores.
Thirty-five adults with CF (FEV = 58 ± 23%) performed a CPET on cycle ergometer with gas exchange measurements. Leg, chest and overall RPE were collected every minute throughout the test. Linear regressions between [Formula: see text]O and RPE ≤ 15 were extrapolated to maximal theoretical RPE (i.e. RPE and RPE) to predict [Formula: see text]O. Agreements between measured and all predicted [Formula: see text]O were tested using Bland-Altman Plots, for the whole group and for subjects presenting significant exercise intolerance (n = 24).
Leg, chest and overall RPE increased similarly with exercise intensity. No differences were found between predicted [Formula: see text]O and measured [Formula: see text]O with RPE as maximal RPE, for both overall and differentiated RPE (P range 0.94-0.98). Ranges for Pearson correlations and limits of agreements were 0.88-0.91 and 380-461 mL min for the whole group and 0.92-0.94 and 269-365 mL min for subjects with significant exercise intolerance. The greatest association and narrowest limits of agreements were obtained from chest RPE scores.
Submaximal RPE scores obtained during CPET can provide acceptable estimate of [Formula: see text]O in adults with CF, particularly in those having significant exercise intolerance. Future studies should assess whether the prediction can be improved, particularly by encouraging the regular use of RPE scales during physical activities/exercise rehabilitations sessions.
我们评估了在囊性纤维化 (CF) 患者递增心肺运动测试 (CPET) 中,从次最大感知用力 (RPE) 评分预测峰值摄氧量 ([Formula: see text]O) 的有效性,并比较了整体和差异化 RPE 评分之间的预测准确性。
35 名成年 CF 患者(FEV=58±23%)在功率自行车上进行 CPET 并进行气体交换测量。在整个测试过程中,每 1 分钟收集腿部、胸部和整体 RPE。通过线性回归,将 [Formula: see text]O 与 RPE≤15 之间的关系外推至最大理论 RPE(即 RPE 和 RPE),以预测 [Formula: see text]O。使用 Bland-Altman 图比较测量和所有预测的 [Formula: see text]O 之间的一致性,包括整个组和运动耐量显著受损的患者 (n=24)。
腿部、胸部和整体 RPE 随运动强度的增加而相似地增加。使用最大 RPE 作为 RPE 时,预测的 [Formula: see text]O 与测量的 [Formula: see text]O 之间没有差异,无论是整体还是差异化 RPE(P 范围为 0.94-0.98)。对于整个组,Pearson 相关系数和一致性界限的范围为 0.88-0.91 和 380-461 mL min,对于运动耐量显著受损的患者,范围为 0.92-0.94 和 269-365 mL min。从胸部 RPE 评分获得的关联最大且一致性界限最窄。
CPET 中获得的次最大 RPE 评分可以为 CF 成年患者提供 [Formula: see text]O 的可接受估计值,特别是在运动耐量显著受损的患者中。未来的研究应评估是否可以通过在身体活动/运动康复训练期间鼓励经常使用 RPE 量表来提高预测能力。