• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

筛查性乳房 X 光检查对确诊乳腺癌女性治疗的影响。

Impact of Screening Mammography on Treatment in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2979-2986. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6646-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-018-6646-8
PMID:29987612
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality; however, screening recommendations, ordering, and compliance remain suboptimal and controversies regarding the value of screening persist. We evaluated the influence of screening mammography on the extent of breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer from September 2008 to May 2016 at a single institution were divided into two groups: those with screening 1-24 months prior to diagnosis, and those with screening at 25+ months, including patients with no prior mammography. The association between the two groups and various clinical factors were assessed using logistic regression models. Subgroup analysis was performed based on age groups.

RESULTS

Analysis included 1125 patients, 819 (73%) with screening at 1-24 months, and 306 (27%) with screening at 25+ months, including 65 (6%) who never had mammography. Overall, patients in the 25+ months group were more likely to receive chemotherapy [odds ratio (OR) 1.51, p = 0.0040], undergo mastectomy (OR 1.32, p = 0.0465), and require axillary dissection (AD; OR 1.66, p = 0.0045) than those in 1-24 months group. On subgroup analysis, patients aged 40-49 years with no prior mammography were more likely to have larger tumors (p = 0.0323) and positive nodes (OR 4.52, p = 0.0058), undergo mastectomy (OR 3.44, p = 0.0068), undergo AD (OR 4.64, p = 0.0002), and require chemotherapy (OR 2.52, p = 0.0287) than the 1-24 months group.

CONCLUSIONS

Screening mammography is associated with decreased stage at diagnosis and receipt of less-extensive treatment. This was evident in all groups, including the 40-49 years age group, where controversy exists on whether screening is even necessary.

摘要

背景

筛查性乳房 X 光检查可降低乳腺癌死亡率;然而,筛查建议、筛查的实施和患者的遵从性仍然不理想,且有关筛查价值的争议仍在持续。我们评估了筛查性乳房 X 光检查对乳腺癌治疗范围的影响。

方法

将 2008 年 9 月至 2016 年 5 月在一家医疗机构就诊的年龄≥40 岁的乳腺癌患者分为两组:诊断前 1-24 个月进行筛查的患者,以及诊断前 25 个月以上进行筛查的患者,包括无既往乳房 X 光检查史的患者。使用逻辑回归模型评估两组与各种临床因素之间的关系。基于年龄组进行亚组分析。

结果

分析共纳入 1125 例患者,其中 819 例(73%)在 1-24 个月内进行了筛查,306 例(27%)在 25 个月以上进行了筛查,包括 65 例(6%)从未进行过乳房 X 光检查。总体而言,25 个月以上组的患者更有可能接受化疗[优势比(OR)1.51,p=0.0040]、接受乳房切除术(OR 1.32,p=0.0465)和需要腋窝清扫术(AD;OR 1.66,p=0.0045),而 1-24 个月组的患者则较少接受这些治疗。在亚组分析中,无既往乳房 X 光检查史且年龄为 40-49 岁的患者更有可能存在较大的肿瘤(p=0.0323)和阳性淋巴结(OR 4.52,p=0.0058),更有可能接受乳房切除术(OR 3.44,p=0.0068)、AD(OR 4.64,p=0.0002)和化疗(OR 2.52,p=0.0287),而不是 1-24 个月组的患者。

结论

筛查性乳房 X 光检查与诊断时分期较低以及接受的治疗范围较小有关。这在所有组中均有体现,包括 40-49 岁年龄组,该组对于是否需要进行筛查存在争议。

相似文献

1
Impact of Screening Mammography on Treatment in Women Diagnosed with Breast Cancer.筛查性乳房 X 光检查对确诊乳腺癌女性治疗的影响。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2979-2986. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6646-8. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
2
Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.在乳腺钼靶筛查中检测出乳腺癌,能让患者接受毒性较小的治疗。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Jan;184(1):324-9. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840324.
3
Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer.两年一次与每年一次乳腺钼靶检查及晚期乳腺癌风险
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Dec 15;96(24):1832-9. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh337.
4
Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.乳腺肿瘤预后特征与两年一次与每年一次乳腺 X 线摄影术、年龄和绝经状态。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1069-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3084.
5
Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.新西兰的乳腺X线筛查服务与乳腺癌死亡率:一项1999 - 2011年的全国队列研究
Br J Cancer. 2017 Mar 14;116(6):828-839. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.6. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
Treatment Intensity Differences After Early-Stage Breast Cancer (ESBC) Diagnosis Depending on Participation in a Screening Program.早期乳腺癌(ESBC)诊断后治疗强度的差异取决于是否参加筛查计划。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2563-2572. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6469-7. Epub 2018 May 1.
7
Screening mammography and breast cancer treatment patterns in older women.老年女性的乳腺钼靶筛查与乳腺癌治疗模式
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Sep;69(1):81-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1012457703106.
8
Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.乳腺钼靶筛查对患有乳腺癌的年轻女性至关重要:42 - 49岁有乳腺钼靶筛查史女性分期降低的证据。
Cancer. 2003 Jan 15;97(2):352-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11050.
9
Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography Screening Effectiveness.乳腺癌肿瘤大小、过度诊断与乳腺 X 线筛查效果
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1438-1447. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600249.
10
[Changes in therapy for breast cancer patients as a result of mammography screening. An analysis of Bavarian cancer registry data from 2000 to 2008].[乳腺钼靶筛查对乳腺癌患者治疗的影响。对2000年至2008年巴伐利亚癌症登记数据的分析]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Oct;75(10):632-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1331732. Epub 2013 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Mammographic screening: hero or villain.乳腺钼靶筛查:英雄还是恶棍?
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2025 Mar 31;71(2):e20241501. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20241501. eCollection 2025.
2
Screening for breast cancer: a systematic review update to inform the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline.乳腺癌筛查:为为加拿大预防性医疗保健指南提供信息而进行的系统评价更新
Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;13(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02700-3.
3
The Effect of Disability and Social Determinants of Health on Breast and Cervical Cancer Screenings During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
残疾与健康的社会决定因素对新冠疫情期间乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的影响
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jan 25;21:E05. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230234.
4
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Health Education Programs for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Communities: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.农村社区宫颈癌预防健康教育项目有效性的系统评价:促进健康公平的意义。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):126-138. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
5
Patterns of Mammography Screening in Women with Breast Cancer in a Kansas Community.堪萨斯州某社区乳腺癌女性的乳房X光检查模式
Prev Med Community Health. 2023 Feb 12;5:1-6.
6
Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.乳腺癌筛查的误区和真相。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Aug 9;29(8):5644-5654. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29080445.
7
How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?CNBSS 是如何长期影响指南的,从中我们能学到什么?
Curr Oncol. 2022 May 30;29(6):3922-3932. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29060313.
8
Marrying Story with Science: The Impact of Outdated and Inconsistent Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Canada.将故事与科学相结合:加拿大过时且不一致的乳腺癌筛查实践的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2022 May 13;29(5):3540-3551. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29050286.
9
Leveraging breast cancer screening to promote timely detection, diagnosis and treatment among women in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review protocol.利用乳腺癌筛查在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的妇女中促进及时发现、诊断和治疗:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 25;12(5):e058729. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058729.
10
Benefits and Risks of Mammography Screening in Women Ages 40 to 49 Years.40 至 49 岁女性乳房 X 光筛查的益处和风险。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501327211058322. doi: 10.1177/21501327211058322.