• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Health Education Programs for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Communities: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.农村社区宫颈癌预防健康教育项目有效性的系统评价:促进健康公平的意义。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):126-138. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
2
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
3
Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.宫颈癌教育及医疗服务提供者的筛查建议对筛查率的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0183924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. eCollection 2017.
4
Cancer screening educational interventions in rural and farmworker communities: a systematic literature review.农村和农民工社区的癌症筛查教育干预措施:系统文献综述。
Ethn Health. 2023 Apr;28(3):335-357. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2022.2056145. Epub 2022 May 2.
5
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
6
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
7
A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women.一项系统评价:干预措施对提高亚洲女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 7;12:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-413.
8
Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder.针对大麻使用障碍的心理社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD005336. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005336.pub4.
9
Educational Interventions to Promote Cervical Cancer Screening among Rural Populations: A Systematic Review.教育干预促进农村人口宫颈癌筛查的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 4;19(11):6874. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116874.
10
WITHDRAWN: Community-based population-level interventions for promoting child oral health.撤回:基于社区的促进儿童口腔健康的人群水平干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 22;12(12):CD009837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009837.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for assessing perceived significance of 23 potentially modifiable cancer risk factors among senior nursing officers.用于评估高级护理人员对 23 种潜在可改变癌症风险因素的感知重要性的混合多准则决策模型。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Oct 30;24(1):1334. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-13078-9.

本文引用的文献

1
HPV self-sampling versus healthcare provider collection on the effect of cervical cancer screening uptake and costs in LMIC: a systematic review and meta-analysis.HPV 自我采样与医疗保健提供者采集对中低收入国家宫颈癌筛查参与度和成本的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 22;12(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02252-y.
2
Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.HPV 自采样试剂盒对美国低收入背景下未接受充分筛查女性宫颈癌筛查参与度的影响(MBMT-3):一项 3 期、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jun;8(6):e411-e421. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00076-2. Epub 2023 May 11.
3
HPV-Based Self-Sampling in Cervical Cancer Screening: An Updated Review of the Current Evidence in the Literature.宫颈癌筛查中基于人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的自我采样:文献中当前证据的最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 8;15(6):1669. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061669.
4
Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening.邮寄家用基于人乳头瘤病毒的宫颈癌筛查自我采样试剂盒的经济评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e234052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4052.
5
Factors associated with delaying medical care: cross-sectional study of Nebraska adults.与延迟医疗相关的因素:内布拉斯加州成年人的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 4;23(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09140-0.
6
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
7
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.全球范围内使用 HPV 自我采样进行宫颈癌筛查。
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106900. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106900. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
9
Cervical Cancer Screening Postpandemic: Self-Sampling Opportunities to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer.大流行后宫颈癌筛查:加速消除宫颈癌的自我采样机会
Int J Womens Health. 2021 Sep 18;13:841-859. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S288376. eCollection 2021.
10
Learning From Cervical Cancer Survivors: An Examination of Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in the United States.从宫颈癌幸存者身上学习:对美国女性宫颈癌筛查障碍和促进因素的考察。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211041862. doi: 10.1177/21501327211041862.

农村社区宫颈癌预防健康教育项目有效性的系统评价:促进健康公平的意义。

A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Health Education Programs for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Rural Communities: Implications for Promoting Health Equity.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

Grace Abbott School of Social Work, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):126-138. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7
PMID:37996632
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10994759/
Abstract

Rural women face an increased risk of cervical cancer diagnosis in comparison to women living in metropolitan areas. This review synthesized and critically evaluated cervical cancer screening interventions that target women living in rural communities in the USA. EBSCO, JSTOR, Medline, PsychINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched using keywords related to cervical cancer screening, rural communities, and prevention interventions. Study eligibility included randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs, a psychosocial or educational intervention targeting cervical cancer prevention, and implementation in a rural setting. Eleven articles met criteria for the systematic review and 6 of those included information sufficient for meta-analysis. Cochrane guidelines, CONSORT-Equity 2017, and PROGRESS-Plus were used to assess included studies. The systematic review encompassed 9720 participants who were involved in a variety of intervention types: social media campaigns, faith-based, and patient navigation with lay health advisors. None of the studies met all criteria for the health equity assessment. The meta-analysis found that women in the intervention groups were more likely to participate in cervical cancer screening than women in control groups (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.49 to 3.97). The type of intervention mattered in increasing cervical cancer screening participation for women living in rural communities. Educational interventions in combination with patient navigation saw the most success in promoting cervical cancer screening. Further, health inequities focus is lacking robust consideration. Our results highlight a continued need to develop multicomponent interventions with a health equity focus to address barriers to screening and prevention.

摘要

与居住在大都市的女性相比,农村女性面临更高的宫颈癌诊断风险。本综述综合并批判性地评价了针对美国农村社区女性的宫颈癌筛查干预措施。使用与宫颈癌筛查、农村社区和预防干预相关的关键词,在 EBSCO、JSTOR、Medline、PsychINFO、心理学和行为科学收藏、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索。研究资格包括随机对照试验或准实验设计、针对宫颈癌预防的社会心理或教育干预以及在农村环境中的实施。有 11 篇文章符合系统评价的标准,其中 6 篇包含足够进行荟萃分析的信息。使用 Cochrane 指南、CONSORT-Equity 2017 和 PROGRESS-Plus 评估纳入的研究。系统评价包括 9720 名参与者,他们参与了各种干预类型:社交媒体活动、基于信仰的活动和患者导航与兼职健康顾问。没有一项研究完全符合健康公平评估的标准。荟萃分析发现,干预组的女性比对照组的女性更有可能参与宫颈癌筛查(OR:2.43,95%CI:1.49 至 3.97)。干预类型对提高农村社区女性宫颈癌筛查参与度很重要。将教育干预与患者导航相结合,在促进宫颈癌筛查方面最为成功。此外,缺乏对健康不公平问题的有力考虑。我们的研究结果强调,需要继续开发以健康公平为重点的多组分干预措施,以解决筛查和预防方面的障碍。