Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Grace Abbott School of Social Work, University of Nebraska Omaha, Omaha, NE, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Apr;39(2):126-138. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02385-7. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
Rural women face an increased risk of cervical cancer diagnosis in comparison to women living in metropolitan areas. This review synthesized and critically evaluated cervical cancer screening interventions that target women living in rural communities in the USA. EBSCO, JSTOR, Medline, PsychINFO, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PubMed, and Cochrane Library were searched using keywords related to cervical cancer screening, rural communities, and prevention interventions. Study eligibility included randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs, a psychosocial or educational intervention targeting cervical cancer prevention, and implementation in a rural setting. Eleven articles met criteria for the systematic review and 6 of those included information sufficient for meta-analysis. Cochrane guidelines, CONSORT-Equity 2017, and PROGRESS-Plus were used to assess included studies. The systematic review encompassed 9720 participants who were involved in a variety of intervention types: social media campaigns, faith-based, and patient navigation with lay health advisors. None of the studies met all criteria for the health equity assessment. The meta-analysis found that women in the intervention groups were more likely to participate in cervical cancer screening than women in control groups (OR: 2.43, 95% CI: 1.49 to 3.97). The type of intervention mattered in increasing cervical cancer screening participation for women living in rural communities. Educational interventions in combination with patient navigation saw the most success in promoting cervical cancer screening. Further, health inequities focus is lacking robust consideration. Our results highlight a continued need to develop multicomponent interventions with a health equity focus to address barriers to screening and prevention.
与居住在大都市的女性相比,农村女性面临更高的宫颈癌诊断风险。本综述综合并批判性地评价了针对美国农村社区女性的宫颈癌筛查干预措施。使用与宫颈癌筛查、农村社区和预防干预相关的关键词,在 EBSCO、JSTOR、Medline、PsychINFO、心理学和行为科学收藏、PubMed 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索。研究资格包括随机对照试验或准实验设计、针对宫颈癌预防的社会心理或教育干预以及在农村环境中的实施。有 11 篇文章符合系统评价的标准,其中 6 篇包含足够进行荟萃分析的信息。使用 Cochrane 指南、CONSORT-Equity 2017 和 PROGRESS-Plus 评估纳入的研究。系统评价包括 9720 名参与者,他们参与了各种干预类型:社交媒体活动、基于信仰的活动和患者导航与兼职健康顾问。没有一项研究完全符合健康公平评估的标准。荟萃分析发现,干预组的女性比对照组的女性更有可能参与宫颈癌筛查(OR:2.43,95%CI:1.49 至 3.97)。干预类型对提高农村社区女性宫颈癌筛查参与度很重要。将教育干预与患者导航相结合,在促进宫颈癌筛查方面最为成功。此外,缺乏对健康不公平问题的有力考虑。我们的研究结果强调,需要继续开发以健康公平为重点的多组分干预措施,以解决筛查和预防方面的障碍。