Skinner O T, Boston S E, Giglio R F, Whitley E M, Colee J C, Porter E G
Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Pathogenesis, LLC, Gainesville, Florida.
Vet Comp Oncol. 2018 Dec;16(4):562-570. doi: 10.1111/vco.12415. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
The diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT for detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in dogs is unknown. The purpose of this retrospective, observational, diagnostic accuracy study was to assess the efficacy of CT for detection of mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis in dogs. Histopathology of dogs with cancer of the head, CT and bilateral mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymphadenectomy was reviewed. A single radiologist measured lymph nodes to derive short axis width and long-short axis ratios. Two blinded radiologists separately assessed lymph node margins, attenuation and contrast enhancement and each provided a final subjective interpretation of each node site as benign or neoplastic. Where radiologists' opinions differed, a consensus was reached. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated for mandibular and medial retropharyngeal sites. Agreement between radiologists was assessed. Fisher's exact test and the Kruskal-Wallis H-test were used to assess associations between variables. Forty-one primary tumours were recorded in 40 dogs. Metastasis to mandibular or retropharyngeal lymph nodes occurred in 16 out of 40 dogs (43/160 nodes). Agreement between radiologists was almost perfect for margination, attenuation and enhancement, strong for interpretation of mandibular lymph node metastasis, and weak for interpretation of medial retropharyngeal lymph node metastasis. Sensitivity of CT was 12.5% and 10.5%, specificity was 91.1% and 96.7%, and accuracy was 67.5% and 76.3% for mandibular and medial retropharyngeal lymph nodes respectively. No individual CT findings were predictive of nodal metastasis. Given the low sensitivity of CT, this modality cannot be relied upon alone for assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in dogs.
对比增强CT检测犬颈部淋巴结转移的诊断准确性尚不清楚。这项回顾性、观察性诊断准确性研究的目的是评估CT检测犬下颌和咽后内侧淋巴结转移的有效性。回顾了患有头部癌症、接受CT检查以及双侧下颌和咽后内侧淋巴结切除术的犬的组织病理学。由一名放射科医生测量淋巴结以得出短轴宽度和长短轴比率。两名盲法放射科医生分别评估淋巴结边缘、密度和对比增强情况,并对每个淋巴结部位的良恶性给出最终主观判断。当放射科医生的意见不同时,达成共识。计算下颌和咽后内侧部位的敏感性、特异性和准确性。评估放射科医生之间的一致性。使用Fisher精确检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验评估变量之间的关联。在40只犬中记录了41个原发性肿瘤。40只犬中有16只(160个淋巴结中的43个)出现下颌或咽后淋巴结转移。放射科医生之间在淋巴结边缘、密度和增强方面的一致性几乎完美,在下颌淋巴结转移的判断上较强,而在咽后内侧淋巴结转移的判断上较弱。下颌和咽后内侧淋巴结的CT敏感性分别为12.5%和10.5%,特异性分别为91.1%和96.7%,准确性分别为67.5%和76.3%。没有单个CT表现可预测淋巴结转移。鉴于CT的敏感性较低,不能仅依靠这种方式来评估犬颈部淋巴结转移。